<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>











<rss version="2.0" xmlns:jf="http://www.jivesoftware.com/xmlns/jiveforums/rss">



<channel>
    <title>Support Forums: Message List - How Will Oracle Handle Sun's Open Source Commitments?</title>
    <link>http://www.theserverside.com</link>
    <description>Most recent forum messages</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
        <generator>Jive Forums Silver 5.5.30 (www.jivesoftware.com)</generator>
    
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 02:51:36 -0400</pubDate>


    <item>

        <title>Re: How Will Oracle Handle Sun's Open Source Commitments?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=54441</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[thx for the post.. have a nice day !

<a href="http://www.sertsikis.com" title="siki&#351;" target="_blank">siki&#351;</a>]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 10:24:54 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 10:24:54 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 10:24:54 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jun 10, 2009</jf:date>
        <jf:author>icq full</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: How Will Oracle Handle Sun's Open Source Commitments?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=54441</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[We all know - Larry means money.If you ever meet a sales guy from oracle you would know.:-)...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 11:47:35 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 11:47:35 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 11:47:35 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jun 8, 2009</jf:date>
        <jf:author>icq full</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: How Will Oracle Handle Sun's Open Source Commitments?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=54441</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[I think that is to much what you are saying, It makes not sense. If Oracle fucked up Java, Oracle will be fucked up. Oracle is a Java company and I think will be better for Java....]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2009 07:03:10 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2009 07:03:10 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2009 07:03:10 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jun 6, 2009</jf:date>
        <jf:author>icq full</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: How Will Oracle Handle Sun's Open Source Commitments?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=54441</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[I think that is to much what you are saying, It makes not sense. If Oracle fucked up Java, Oracle will be fucked up. Oracle is a Java company and I think will be better for Java....]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 05:55:50 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 05:55:50 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 05:55:50 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jun 5, 2009</jf:date>
        <jf:author>icq full</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: How Will Oracle Handle Sun's Open Source Commitments?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=54441</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[We all know - Larry means money.If you ever meet a sales guy from oracle you would know.:-)...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 15:15:07 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 15:15:07 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 15:15:07 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>May 28, 2009</jf:date>
        <jf:author>icq full</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Well said</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=54441</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Open Source issue needs to be addressed in the new scenario... Oracle has been very successful in utilizing the opportunity offered to them,, even when they did not have the best products or technology. This had been the case since day 1 when IBM put the...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 08:11:38 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 08:11:38 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 08:11:38 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>May 12, 2009</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Gopi Nathan</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Java was the goal</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=54441</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Larry Ellison said, "We have Java," after this deal. Not 'We have Sun.'...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 15:33:35 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 15:33:35 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 15:33:35 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>May 5, 2009</jf:date>
        <jf:author>megan c. adams</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Java will be fine...</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=54441</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[FWIW, I don't think he was comparing Silverlight to Swing. I think he was comparing WPF to Swing, and I agree, WPF is significantly better.]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 11:54:47 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 11:54:47 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 11:54:47 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>May 1, 2009</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Peter Mularien</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Java will be fine...</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=54441</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Come on, Microsoft is probably going to release C#5 with lots of functional programming features, even better LINQ and a whole lot of other improvements by the time Sun would release Java7 without any new significant features.</blockquote>...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 17:20:02 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 17:20:02 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 17:20:02 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Apr 30, 2009</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Uffe Seerup</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>JavaFX is vapourware?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=54441</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[To the posters who claim that JavaFX is vapourware, please justify your statement.]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 15:35:17 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 15:35:17 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 15:35:17 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Apr 30, 2009</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Homer Simpson</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Java will be fine...</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=54441</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote><blockquote>Moving away from JCP will kill Java. I don't think Oracle will ever do it. After all Oracle has more commercial stake in Java than Sun.</blockquote><br><br>JCP is glacially slow (JSR-107?). JCP is irrelevant or tries to mirror...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 13:10:27 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 13:10:27 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 13:10:27 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Apr 30, 2009</jf:date>
        <jf:author>peter lin</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>2</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Java will be fine...</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=54441</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Moving away from JCP will kill Java. I don't think Oracle will ever do it. After all Oracle has more commercial stake in Java than Sun.</blockquote>...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 09:45:44 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 09:45:44 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 09:45:44 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Apr 30, 2009</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Alex Besogonov</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>4</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>People are not thinking straight</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=54441</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[They wouldn't even need to do much just offering a dumbed down community version would either force the competition to raise up(apache harmony and alikes) or simply scare away most Java shops. ...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 07:07:47 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 07:07:47 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 07:07:47 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Apr 30, 2009</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Raphael -</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: How Will Oracle Handle Sun's Open Source Commitments?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=54441</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>I think that is to much what you are saying, It makes not sense. If Oracle fucked up Java, Oracle will be fucked up. Oracle is a Java company and I think will be better for Java.<br><br>It is like saying that Microsoft will fucked up the...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 03:35:37 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 03:35:37 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 03:35:37 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Apr 30, 2009</jf:date>
        <jf:author>shawn spencer</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: How Will Oracle Handle Sun's Open Source Commitments?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=54441</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>I think that is to much what you are saying, It makes not sense. If Oracle fucked up Java, Oracle will be fucked up. Oracle is a Java company and I think will be better for Java.<br><br>It is like saying that Microsoft will fucked up the...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 01:07:03 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 01:07:03 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 01:07:03 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Apr 30, 2009</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Andrew Thompson</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>



</channel>
</rss>

