Support Forums: Message List - Announcing @javax.inject.Inject http://www.theserverside.com Most recent forum messages en Jive Forums Silver 5.5.30 (www.jivesoftware.com) Fri, 24 May 2013 18:23:19 -0400 Expandability http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=54499 Google Guice and SpringSource coming together was a great move for all of us. The cross platform recognition has opened up a lot for us and made our jobs a lot more easy. The interconnectivity is the key when it comes to offering customers greater...]]> Fri, 04 Nov 2011 09:22:49 -0400 Fri, 04 Nov 2011 09:22:49 -0400 Fri, 04 Nov 2011 09:22:49 -0400 Nov 4, 2011 1CannabisSeeds 0 Hi, http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=54499 What I am searching for is adolescent humans of access in our community pass4sure 640-802. I am alive on ambience up an Advisory Council that will serve as consultants and connectors...]]> Mon, 27 Jun 2011 07:37:03 -0400 Mon, 27 Jun 2011 07:37:03 -0400 Mon, 27 Jun 2011 07:37:03 -0400 Jun 27, 2011 Yeng21 0 JBOSSY http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=54499 Please everyone remember to be polite with one another. Let's try to use this site for intellectual discussions and as a forum for creative thinking and consensus building.

Ian...]]> Tue, 12 May 2009 20:18:13 -0400 Tue, 12 May 2009 20:18:13 -0400 Tue, 12 May 2009 20:18:13 -0400 May 12, 2009 Nathan MA 1 Re: Announcing @javax.inject.Inject http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=54499 Tue, 12 May 2009 18:55:46 -0400 Tue, 12 May 2009 18:55:46 -0400 Tue, 12 May 2009 18:55:46 -0400 May 12, 2009 Ian Hlavats 2 Re: SE DI http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=54499 JSR-299 doesn't depend on EJB. EJB is a layer on top of JSR 299. The spec could easily be rewritten to put all the EJB layer in an Appendix D....]]> Tue, 12 May 2009 00:50:58 -0400 Tue, 12 May 2009 00:50:58 -0400 Tue, 12 May 2009 00:50:58 -0400 May 12, 2009 Gavin King 0 Re: SE DI http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=54499 Hi Gavin
why wait for the end of the year?
just sit down now and get this subset done and all will b happy...]]> Tue, 12 May 2009 00:47:05 -0400 Tue, 12 May 2009 00:47:05 -0400 Tue, 12 May 2009 00:47:05 -0400 May 12, 2009 Scott Ferguson 1 Re: no-arg http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=54499 Tue, 12 May 2009 00:28:57 -0400 Tue, 12 May 2009 00:28:57 -0400 Tue, 12 May 2009 00:28:57 -0400 May 12, 2009 Gavin King 0 Re: SE DI http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=54499 Hi Gavin
why wait for the end of the year?
just sit down now and get this subset done and all will b happy

i think that u will not b alone thinking, several will help as u can see it is a much needed functionality...]]> Tue, 12 May 2009 00:14:21 -0400 Tue, 12 May 2009 00:14:21 -0400 Tue, 12 May 2009 00:14:21 -0400 May 12, 2009 Gavin King 0 Re: SE DI http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=54499 Tue, 12 May 2009 00:10:22 -0400 Tue, 12 May 2009 00:10:22 -0400 Tue, 12 May 2009 00:10:22 -0400 May 12, 2009 fawzyj 3 Re: no-arg http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=54499
It is correct that 299 requires a no-argument constructor if you depend on a scoped class.
...]]> Tue, 12 May 2009 00:07:53 -0400 Tue, 12 May 2009 00:07:53 -0400 Tue, 12 May 2009 00:07:53 -0400 May 12, 2009 Gavin King 1 Re: JSR-299 binding subset http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=54499
Right, but his proposal does not have a request scope :-)

It only has two scopes: the default (our @Dependent) and @Singleton.
But because his @Scope (our @ScopeType) is a meta-annotation, its full behavior...]]> Mon, 11 May 2009 23:53:22 -0400 Mon, 11 May 2009 23:53:22 -0400 Mon, 11 May 2009 23:53:22 -0400 May 11, 2009 Gavin King 0 Re: no-arg http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=54499
It is correct that 299 requires a no-argument constructor if you depend on a scoped class.
...]]> Mon, 11 May 2009 23:15:01 -0400 Mon, 11 May 2009 23:15:01 -0400 Mon, 11 May 2009 23:15:01 -0400 May 11, 2009 Bob Lee 2 Re: JSR-299 binding subset http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=54499 Right, but his proposal does not have a request scope :-)

It only has two scopes: the default (our @Dependent) and @Singleton.
...]]> Mon, 11 May 2009 23:13:29 -0400 Mon, 11 May 2009 23:13:29 -0400 Mon, 11 May 2009 23:13:29 -0400 May 11, 2009 Scott Ferguson 1 Re: JSR-299 binding subset http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=54499
Actually Scott, I don't think its that difficult. Our pseudo-scopes are a pretty close match to the notion of scope in Bob's proposal,


I assumed Bob did not want the proxying behavior for something like...]]> Mon, 11 May 2009 22:33:29 -0400 Mon, 11 May 2009 22:33:29 -0400 Mon, 11 May 2009 22:33:29 -0400 May 11, 2009 Gavin King 2 Re: JSR-299 binding subset http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=54499 Actually Scott, I don't think its that difficult. Our pseudo-scopes are a pretty close match to the notion of scope in Bob's proposal,...]]> Mon, 11 May 2009 22:11:22 -0400 Mon, 11 May 2009 22:11:22 -0400 Mon, 11 May 2009 22:11:22 -0400 May 11, 2009 Scott Ferguson 3