<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>











<rss version="2.0" xmlns:jf="http://www.jivesoftware.com/xmlns/jiveforums/rss">



<channel>
    <title>Support Forums: Message List - No more loops with LambdaJ 1.8</title>
    <link>http://www.theserverside.com</link>
    <description>Most recent forum messages</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
        <generator>Jive Forums Silver 5.5.30 (www.jivesoftware.com)</generator>
    
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 15:50:39 -0400</pubDate>


    <item>

        <title>Re: No more loops with LambdaJ 1.8</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=54611</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 03:42:41 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 03:42:41 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 03:42:41 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>May 21, 2009</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Mario Fusco</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: No more loops with LambdaJ 1.8</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=54611</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>I think that if you "return that Person instance from some deeply nested methods" you're just using it in the wrong way. lambdaj is a tool, exactly in the same way as an hammer is a tool: you can hit a nail (right way to use it) or a person's...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 03:02:14 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 03:02:14 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 03:02:14 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>May 21, 2009</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Daniel Kordoba</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: No more loops with LambdaJ 1.8</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=54611</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>And that is the dealbreaker for me, because it totally changes the semantics of what a class is. Just imagine you return that Person instance from some deeply nested methods and the users of that API does not know about those...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 16:12:03 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 16:12:03 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 16:12:03 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>May 20, 2009</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Mario Fusco</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>2</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: No more loops with LambdaJ 1.8</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=54611</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 14:40:33 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 14:40:33 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 14:40:33 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>May 20, 2009</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Daniel Kordoba</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>3</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Closure in Java couldn't be a good idea</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=54611</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Oh, you mean the "carefully chosen" examples that demonstrate deficiencies that arent really related to Closures but are cause by defered execution in general. E.g. the sample with the addition of those integers ("45 or 100?") is not a result of...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 14:12:14 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 14:12:14 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 14:12:14 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>May 20, 2009</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Daniel Kordoba</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Closure in Java couldn't be a good idea</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=54611</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Not everybody agree that to have closure in Java could be a good idea....]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 12:48:20 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 12:48:20 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 12:48:20 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>May 20, 2009</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Mario Fusco</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Java needs Lambdas, you cannot fight evolution</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=54611</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[This approach is nice, however it would be much cleaner if we had support for lambdas directly in the language. This way we could use the higher level abstraction benefits in all places, not just on Iterables....]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 12:40:00 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 12:40:00 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 12:40:00 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>May 20, 2009</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Daniel Kordoba</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>2</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>... or Scala</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=54611</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[One of the ideas behind lambdaj is exactly to provide some facilities (that are available in a more natural way in more modern languages) in Java for people who don't want to (or more likely just can't in some specific projects, as it happens to me) move...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 12:33:57 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 12:33:57 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 12:33:57 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>May 20, 2009</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Mario Fusco</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Or you can use Groovy...</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=54611</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[I think that looks nice to Java programmers....]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 11:53:35 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 11:53:35 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 11:53:35 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>May 20, 2009</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Armin Weisser</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: No more loops with LambdaJ 1.8</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=54611</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 05:23:31 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 05:23:31 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 05:23:31 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>May 20, 2009</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Mario Fusco</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: No more loops with LambdaJ 1.8</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=54611</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 05:13:26 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 05:13:26 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 05:13:26 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>May 20, 2009</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Mario Fusco</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>5</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: No more loops with LambdaJ 1.8</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=54611</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[This looks like an interesting approach, but I have a couple of questions about it......]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 04:20:27 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 04:20:27 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 04:20:27 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>May 20, 2009</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Daniel Fernandez</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>6</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: FP in Java</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=54611</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Luckily, this is not functional but declarative. Spreadsheets and SQL are functional / declarative, and both seem to be relatively popular :-)]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 03:03:58 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 03:03:58 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 03:03:58 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>May 20, 2009</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Thomas Mueller</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Why do we need this?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=54611</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[The similarity to Commons Collections is entirely superficial.  Commons Collections doesn't use proxies, doesn't support generics, etc.]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 16:18:51 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 16:18:51 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 16:18:51 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>May 19, 2009</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Bruce Fancher</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>interesting</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=54611</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[No need to think functional to use this....]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 15:40:26 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 15:40:26 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 15:40:26 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>May 19, 2009</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Juha Palomaki</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>



</channel>
</rss>

