<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>











<rss version="2.0" xmlns:jf="http://www.jivesoftware.com/xmlns/jiveforums/rss">



<channel>
    <title>Support Forums: Message List - component based web frameworks still not a proven concept</title>
    <link>http://www.theserverside.com</link>
    <description>Most recent forum messages</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
        <generator>Jive Forums Silver 5.5.30 (www.jivesoftware.com)</generator>
    
    <pubDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 21:48:01 -0400</pubDate>


    <item>

        <title>Woodfield Mall Guide - Chicago's Largest Shopping Center</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=57202</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<p>Woodfield Mall Guide - Chicago's Largest Shopping Center<br/><a class="jive-link-external" href="http://woodfieldmall.net/" target="_newWindow">http://woodfieldmall.net/</a><br/><br/><br/>&lt;a...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 05:35:16 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 05:35:16 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 05:35:16 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Feb 12, 2012</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Woodfield  mall</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: component based web frameworks still not a proven concept</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=57202</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>... simpler solutions can be achieved by extending servlets.</blockquote>...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2009 12:25:27 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2009 12:25:27 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2009 12:25:27 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Aug 30, 2009</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Alex Serov</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Probably</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=57202</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[I missed your "Good to hear" message implying that you do write your own ORM, DI, AOP, etc.. solutions (or skip the concepts altogether).  Just FYI I agree with you on most of your points but still hold out hope for a quality higher level web framework...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 16:18:37 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 16:18:37 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 16:18:37 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Aug 28, 2009</jf:date>
        <jf:author>KJ Henrie</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Probably</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=57202</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Presumptuous indeed.  I have found few frameworks that provide value in web application development and in fact wrote my own web framework and rich component JavaScript library in 2002 (when JavaScript wasn't cool).  Do you use Hibernate, JPA, or Spring...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 15:47:52 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 15:47:52 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 15:47:52 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Aug 28, 2009</jf:date>
        <jf:author>KJ Henrie</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Good to hear</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=57202</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Fortunately for me, I've been given a lot of autonomy in my job because I have a proven track record of getting things done and creating quality applications. That means I don't have some guru imposing certain technologies upon me. Unfortunately, I'm...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 14:40:55 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 14:40:55 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 14:40:55 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Aug 28, 2009</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Paul Lee</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Probably</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=57202</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[You probably shouldn't maintain my code. Good design is difficult to do, but very easy to screw up. I find developing with Servlets and jsp as easy but apparently difficult for you. I don't know or care why people build these things. I just don't need...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 14:23:17 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 14:23:17 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 14:23:17 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Aug 28, 2009</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Paul Lee</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>2</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Maybe</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=57202</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Sometimes our opinions are skewed by the technologies we are comfortable and/or familiar with.  What I like about a well written component framework (Wicket is my framework of choice) is that it allows me to make use of OO Java.  Request/response...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 13:30:38 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 13:30:38 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 13:30:38 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Aug 28, 2009</jf:date>
        <jf:author>KJ Henrie</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Maybe</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=57202</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[I found your posting interesting, especially because of some of the points that you mentioned. For example "keeping things simple",  not having to "to spend a lot time coding with, around, and behind the architecture", pages are "bloated and they feel...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 10:31:48 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 10:31:48 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 10:31:48 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Aug 28, 2009</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Akin Bolarinwa</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>2</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: the point of component orientation</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=57202</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Component orientation has been proven many many years ago in desktop and in web components shine when used with AJAX, in fact AJAX pushes component orientation in web to the desktop level....]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 06:34:52 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 06:34:52 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 06:34:52 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Aug 28, 2009</jf:date>
        <jf:author>jmarranz</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: the point of component orientation</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=57202</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>FWIW, besides using e.g. Wicket or GWT, I also consider a SOA approach (whether that's using web services, JSON interaction or something else) with an Ajax front end to be a component oriented approach when done right. What matters is that...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 23:06:06 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 23:06:06 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 23:06:06 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Aug 27, 2009</jf:date>
        <jf:author>hari sujathan</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Maybe</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=57202</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>. I've managed to avoid most of the Java architectures and stuck with just basic Servlets and JSP's</blockquote> Maybe i shouldn't post in the "mood" i am in but i hope i never have to maintain your code. I have had to maintain code "like"...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 23:03:38 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 23:03:38 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 23:03:38 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Aug 27, 2009</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Mark N</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>3</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Maybe</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=57202</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Consequently, development is routinely quick, reliable, and maintainable</blockquote> If two out of three "ain't bad", what is one out of three?]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 22:34:17 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 22:34:17 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 22:34:17 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Aug 27, 2009</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Mark N</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>the point of component orientation</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=57202</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[A component oriented way of developing your application means that instead of thinking in request/ response cycles you can think in widgets: panels, trees, form fields, etc. The point is that you can break up your problem in smaller and independent bits...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 19:37:59 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 19:37:59 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 19:37:59 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Aug 27, 2009</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Eelco Hillenius</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>2</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Maybe</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=57202</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[I had trouble reading the article because it's not very well written, but I'm also in favor of keeping things simple, which I think is what the author is promoting. I'm not a fan of big architectures because for the most part, they aren't needed. Having...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 19:33:41 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 19:33:41 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 19:33:41 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Aug 27, 2009</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Paul Lee</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>8</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>This article is written by a kid</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=57202</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Dear how many component based web frameworks you look at before writing this useless article. ...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 17:59:44 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 17:59:44 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 17:59:44 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Aug 27, 2009</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Pushpinder Singh</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>



</channel>
</rss>

