<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>











<rss version="2.0" xmlns:jf="http://www.jivesoftware.com/xmlns/jiveforums/rss">



<channel>
    <title>Support Forums: Message List - New high performance ORM for Java: Ujorm</title>
    <link>http://www.theserverside.com</link>
    <description>Most recent forum messages</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
        <generator>Jive Forums Silver 5.5.30 (www.jivesoftware.com)</generator>
    
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 17:47:54 -0400</pubDate>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Ujorm does not use Java reflection</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=57421</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[the tests need to me elaborated.  we need to try is on different databases with different combination. initial look for the framework seems interesting.]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 00:42:44 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 00:42:44 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 00:42:44 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Sep 9, 2009</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Kitarp P</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Ujorm does not use Java reflection</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=57421</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Framework reads and writes data without a reflection.</blockquote>...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 12:51:25 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 12:51:25 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 12:51:25 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Sep 3, 2009</jf:date>
        <jf:author>augustientje bloem</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Quick comments</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=57421</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Hibernate <i>can</i> avoid reflection on BOs by using Getters/Setters (access="property")</li><br></ul></blockquote>

Doesn't Hibernate use reflection to call getters and setters?]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 11:36:19 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 11:36:19 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 11:36:19 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Sep 3, 2009</jf:date>
        <jf:author>James Watson</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Quick comments</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=57421</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote><blockquote>Can you elaborate why Ujorm is faster than Hibernate/EclipseLink for example?</blockquote><br>I think the Ujorm has two main features which affect positively the performance:<ul><li>the rapid build SQL query without parsing a text...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 16:24:23 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 16:24:23 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 16:24:23 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Sep 2, 2009</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Jens Augustsson</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: New high performance ORM for Java: Ujorm</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=57421</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<div class="jive-quote">why a query should not be written in [SQL]</div>...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 15:40:31 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 15:40:31 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 15:40:31 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Sep 2, 2009</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Thomas Mueller</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Ujorm does not use Java reflection</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=57421</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote><blockquote>and this argument is highly questionable</blockquote><br>I do not understand where you see the problem? Framework reads and writes data without a reflection. Verify it in the source code.</blockquote>...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 14:31:37 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 14:31:37 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 14:31:37 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Sep 2, 2009</jf:date>
        <jf:author>James Watson</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Transaction scope</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=57421</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[All database DML statements can be seen as temporary until they are committed. Ujorm supports commitment with the Ujorm Session.commit() . Method Session.rollback() is used to remove operations performed since the previous commit or rollback. Use this...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 12:42:07 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 12:42:07 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 12:42:07 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Sep 2, 2009</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Paul Ponec</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Ujorm does not use Java reflection</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=57421</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>and this argument is highly questionable</blockquote>
I do not understand where you see the problem? Framework reads and writes data without a reflection. Verify it in the source code.]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 12:06:44 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 12:06:44 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 12:06:44 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Sep 2, 2009</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Paul Ponec</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>3</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: join from a table to itself</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=57421</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[The solution is a mapping a BO to the native SQL query by a @View annotation now. I will try to develop some alternative way in a future release.

<blockquote>I like Ujorm</blockquote>Thank you, I appreciate it.]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 11:49:44 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 11:49:44 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 11:49:44 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Sep 2, 2009</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Paul Ponec</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: New high performance ORM for Java: Ujorm</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=57421</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[I cannot understand why a query should not be written in the Standard Query Language, but written in that manner!...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 11:43:46 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 11:43:46 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 11:43:46 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Sep 2, 2009</jf:date>
        <jf:author>michele michele</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: better performance?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=57421</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Ujorm does not use Java reflection when working with BO objects</blockquote>

and this argument is highly questionable as well, nowadays...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 08:29:18 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 08:29:18 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 08:29:18 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Sep 2, 2009</jf:date>
        <jf:author>uwe schaefer</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>4</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: New high performance ORM for Java: Ujorm</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=57421</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[JTA supported? No? Bye...

sorry to sound rude, but it is as easy as that...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 08:26:05 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 08:26:05 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 08:26:05 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Sep 2, 2009</jf:date>
        <jf:author>uwe schaefer</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: New high performance ORM for Java: Ujorm</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=57421</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[How well does it integrate with Wicket?]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 08:16:41 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 08:16:41 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 08:16:41 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Sep 2, 2009</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Reinout van Schouwen</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: New high performance ORM for Java: Ujorm</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=57421</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[I like Ujorm. No XML, no bytecode generation at runtime, it's easy to understand and debug......]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 04:34:16 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 04:34:16 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 04:34:16 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Sep 2, 2009</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Thomas Mueller</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>2</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: JPA</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=57421</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<ul>...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 02:21:52 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 02:21:52 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 02:21:52 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Sep 2, 2009</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Alessandro Santini</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>



</channel>
</rss>

