Support Forums: Message List - SpringSource to move dmServer to Eclipse – OSGi not ready for mainstream? http://www.theserverside.com Most recent forum messages en Jive Forums Silver 5.5.30 (www.jivesoftware.com) Thu, 20 Jun 2013 04:16:19 -0400 SpringSource to move dmServer to Eclipse – OSGi not ready for mainstream? http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=59183
Which they shouldn't.

As someone who watched the development of Spring's OSGI offerings from day one, I was exceptionally disappointed with how...]]> Wed, 28 Apr 2010 11:43:14 -0400 Fri, 16 Apr 2010 11:18:03 -0400 Wed, 28 Apr 2010 11:43:14 -0400 Apr 28, 2010 yuregininsesi 0 Re: SpringSource to move dmServer to Eclipse – OSGi not ready for mainstream? http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=59183 Sat, 30 Jan 2010 17:59:05 -0500 Thu, 28 Jan 2010 17:39:20 -0500 Sat, 30 Jan 2010 17:59:05 -0500 Jan 30, 2010 mike jones 0 JavaEE not ready for OSGi or any change for that matter http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=59183 Fri, 29 Jan 2010 02:23:35 -0500 Fri, 29 Jan 2010 02:23:35 -0500 Fri, 29 Jan 2010 02:23:35 -0500 Jan 29, 2010 John Woo 0 Re: SpringSource to move dmServer to Eclipse – OSGi not ready fo http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=59183 Sat, 23 Jan 2010 07:11:56 -0500 Sat, 23 Jan 2010 07:11:56 -0500 Sat, 23 Jan 2010 07:11:56 -0500 Jan 23, 2010 Erik GOLLOT 0 Re: Dependency Hell http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=59183 So just give me that advantage without making me do so much work to get my own jars running. I'm free to pick whatever versions I want for the jars I use in my app. I don't really need all that attention to OSGi details....]]> Wed, 20 Jan 2010 09:34:17 -0500 Wed, 20 Jan 2010 09:34:17 -0500 Wed, 20 Jan 2010 09:34:17 -0500 Jan 20, 2010 James Watson 0 Re: OSGi not ready, is it? http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=59183 We've developed a complete enterprise SOA platform based on OSGi. Check out WSO2 Carbon project and the related products in wso2.com/products

...]]> Wed, 20 Jan 2010 05:45:42 -0500 Wed, 20 Jan 2010 05:45:42 -0500 Wed, 20 Jan 2010 05:45:42 -0500 Jan 20, 2010 michele michele 0 Dependency Hell http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=59183 Tue, 19 Jan 2010 20:50:35 -0500 Tue, 19 Jan 2010 20:50:35 -0500 Tue, 19 Jan 2010 20:50:35 -0500 Jan 19, 2010 Lee Meador 1 Re: Modularization is difficult http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=59183 Tue, 19 Jan 2010 17:09:18 -0500 Tue, 19 Jan 2010 17:09:18 -0500 Tue, 19 Jan 2010 17:09:18 -0500 Jan 19, 2010 Gary P 2 Re: Modularization is difficult http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=59183 I never claimed it did magic (though having read the spec some of it does seem magical! :-)) Not sure why fans of a particular technology have to be so insulting when people ask honest questions.....]]> Tue, 19 Jan 2010 16:39:39 -0500 Tue, 19 Jan 2010 16:39:39 -0500 Tue, 19 Jan 2010 16:39:39 -0500 Jan 19, 2010 James Watson 3 Re: Modularization is difficult http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=59183 You can change the manifests on 3rd party jars too. I don't really see what difference it makes. You don't need the source to modify exports in the manifest. The point of OSGi is not to force people to use shitty APIs. The point is that...]]> Tue, 19 Jan 2010 16:06:57 -0500 Tue, 19 Jan 2010 16:06:57 -0500 Tue, 19 Jan 2010 16:06:57 -0500 Jan 19, 2010 Gary P 4 OSGi not ready, is it? http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=59183 I've never used OSGi on my projects because it is too complex to use and configure.
Many people thought that EJB 2.1 were too complex, and decided to migrate to the Spring approach.
Now, OSGi could die for the same reason....]]> Tue, 19 Jan 2010 12:37:42 -0500 Tue, 19 Jan 2010 12:37:42 -0500 Tue, 19 Jan 2010 12:37:42 -0500 Jan 19, 2010 Sameera Jayasoma 1 Re: Modularization is difficult http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=59183
Mainly the export. By implicitly hiding what isn't exported you can prevent packages that are not part of the public API from being accessed. This has a side benefit of determining structuring package easier. You can have...]]> Tue, 19 Jan 2010 10:58:36 -0500 Tue, 19 Jan 2010 10:58:36 -0500 Tue, 19 Jan 2010 10:58:36 -0500 Jan 19, 2010 James Watson 5 Re: SpringSource to move dmServer to Eclipse – OSGi not ready for mainstream? http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=59183 Tue, 19 Jan 2010 10:32:31 -0500 Tue, 19 Jan 2010 10:32:31 -0500 Tue, 19 Jan 2010 10:32:31 -0500 Jan 19, 2010 Phil Zoio 0 Re: SpringSource to move dmServer to Eclipse – OSGi not ready fo http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=59183 Tue, 19 Jan 2010 10:11:37 -0500 Tue, 19 Jan 2010 10:11:37 -0500 Tue, 19 Jan 2010 10:11:37 -0500 Jan 19, 2010 Joerg Bullmann 0 Re: Modularization is difficult http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=59183 Mainly the export. By implicitly hiding what isn't exported you can prevent packages that are not part of the public API from being accessed. This has a side benefit of determining structuring package easier. You can have public classes...]]> Tue, 19 Jan 2010 10:11:29 -0500 Tue, 19 Jan 2010 10:11:29 -0500 Tue, 19 Jan 2010 10:11:29 -0500 Jan 19, 2010 Gary P 6