<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>











<rss version="2.0" xmlns:jf="http://www.jivesoftware.com/xmlns/jiveforums/rss">



<channel>
    <title>Support Forums: Message List - XNIO:  A Better NIO For Java</title>
    <link>http://www.theserverside.com</link>
    <description>Most recent forum messages</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
        <generator>Jive Forums Silver 5.5.30 (www.jivesoftware.com)</generator>
    
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 23:15:12 -0400</pubDate>


    <item>

        <title>Re: XNIO: A Better NIO For Java</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=59632</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Which is pretty useful for those of us that didn't know that XNIO exists.  I'm not sure that more editorializing on top of that would've added much.</blockquote>...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 11:12:43 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 11:12:43 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 11:12:43 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Mar 9, 2010</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Matt Giacomini</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: XNIO: A Better NIO For Java</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=59632</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>And when you were at TSS, did you also have those pesky ex-colleagues who were constantly critisizing your work?</blockquote>Sure. In this case, I was actually asked for my opinion; I have normally been pretty quiet about what I do and don't...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 10:49:59 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 10:49:59 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 10:49:59 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Mar 9, 2010</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Joseph Ottinger</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: XNIO: A Better NIO For Java</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=59632</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[And when you were at TSS, did you also have those pesky ex-colleagues who were constantly critisizing your work?...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 05:31:37 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 05:31:37 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 05:31:37 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Mar 9, 2010</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Cat Weazle</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: XNIO: A Better NIO For Java</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=59632</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA["Useful" would be code samples.  Comparative this or that.  This is basically a really long winded tweet that tells me nothing new if I'd already known about XNIO.  That's Joe's point, I think.  Mine for sure.]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 15:41:18 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 15:41:18 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 15:41:18 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Mar 8, 2010</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Justin Lee</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: XNIO: A Better NIO For Java</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=59632</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Joe wrote:<blockquote>I'm glad to see Techtarget finally has the drive to update the site some, but even there, we're not talking news posts (which are for, like, news) but simply references.</blockquote>Indeed.  Take heart, though.  I have some cool...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 15:33:48 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 15:33:48 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 15:33:48 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Mar 8, 2010</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Eugene Ciurana</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: XNIO: A Better NIO For Java</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=59632</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Which is pretty useful for those of us that didn't know that XNIO exists.  I'm not sure that more editorializing on top of that would've added much.</blockquote>Well... the only problem with that is that the number of projects you don't know...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 13:06:31 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 13:06:31 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 13:06:31 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Mar 8, 2010</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Joseph Ottinger</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>4</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: XNIO: A Better NIO For Java</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=59632</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Which is pretty useful for those of us that didn't know that XNIO exists.  I'm not sure that more editorializing on top of that would've added much.]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 12:38:46 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 12:38:46 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 12:38:46 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Mar 8, 2010</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Dmitri Bichko</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>6</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: XNIO:  A Better NIO For Java</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=59632</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>How does XNIO differ from the awesome network library also from JBoss: Netty?</blockquote>

I think Netty uses XNIO.  but I may be wrong?]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 11:43:26 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 11:43:26 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 11:43:26 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Mar 8, 2010</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Matt Giacomini</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: XNIO:  A Better NIO For Java</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=59632</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Dushyanth wrote:<blockquote>How does XNIO differ from the awesome network library also from JBoss: Netty?  <br><br>From what I can see, XNIO aims to simplify just NIO usage. But, Netty does that and so much more.</blockquote>I think it's the difference...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 11:40:25 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 11:40:25 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 11:40:25 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Mar 8, 2010</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Eugene Ciurana</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: XNIO:  A Better NIO For Java</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=59632</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[*sigh*

Look, XNIO is great - anyone doing nonblocking IO should be using it over Netty or, God forbid, raw NIO.

But this post is pointless. It's just an arrow saying "XNIO exists." Bleah.]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 10:41:07 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 10:41:07 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 10:41:07 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Mar 8, 2010</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Joseph Ottinger</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>7</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: XNIO:  A Better NIO For Java</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=59632</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[How does XNIO differ from the awesome network library also from JBoss: Netty?  

From what I can see, XNIO aims to simplify just NIO usage. But, Netty does that and so much more.]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 10:40:09 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 10:40:09 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 10:40:09 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Mar 8, 2010</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Dushyanth Inguva</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>2</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>XNIO:  A Better NIO For Java</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=59632</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Anyone who relies on using NIO must check out XNIO which is available at <a href="http://www.jboss.org/xnio/downloads.html" target="_blank">the XNIO downloads site</a>. Think of XNIO as a simplified low-level I/O layer totally compatible with any...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 10:21:40 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 10:21:40 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 10:21:40 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Mar 8, 2010</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Charles Colt</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>11</jf:replyCount>
    </item>



</channel>
</rss>

