<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>











<rss version="2.0" xmlns:jf="http://www.jivesoftware.com/xmlns/jiveforums/rss">



<channel>
    <title>Support Forums: Message List - IBM Cleans Up as AT&amp;#38;T Takes a $2.5 Billion Bath</title>
    <link>http://www.theserverside.com</link>
    <description>Most recent forum messages</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
        <generator>Jive Forums Silver 5.5.30 (www.jivesoftware.com)</generator>
    
    <pubDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 03:16:39 -0400</pubDate>


    <item>

        <title>Just the WebSphere Rules Engine?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=60211</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<p>Currently the Websphere name is added to all the server products whether or not it has much to do with Java or application servers.&nbsp; I was told once by an IBMer that they employ a guy full time just to come up with names and acronyms.&nbsp; I...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 01 Jun 2010 15:52:59 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 01 Jun 2010 15:52:59 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 01 Jun 2010 15:52:59 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jun 1, 2010</jf:date>
        <jf:author>James Watson</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re:IBM Cleans Up as AT&amp;#38;T Takes a $2.5 Billion Bath</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=60211</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<p>I guess its more about acquiring customers of the original company&nbsp;rather than the technology. I feel that many times the conversion to "IBM Stack" of these customers is more profitable than the actual acquisition itself :-)</p>]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 24 May 2010 23:15:04 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 24 May 2010 23:15:04 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 24 May 2010 23:15:04 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>May 24, 2010</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Vedesh Dambal</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>prices to go up !</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=60211</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<p>That's how IBM operates. Having gone through that process in the past, that's how the strategy works. IBM sales guys are good at saying "it costs a lot because it is a great value". Those who buy ibm software and services are used to high prices....]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 24 May 2010 19:34:11 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 24 May 2010 19:34:11 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 24 May 2010 19:34:11 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>May 24, 2010</jf:date>
        <jf:author>peter lin</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>3</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Just the WebSphere Rules Engine?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=60211</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<p>They call it the WebSphere Rules Engine? I'd be less surprised if it was called the IBM Rational WebSphere Application Rules Engine for Architects. That would go more along with their trend.</p>...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 24 May 2010 19:02:16 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 24 May 2010 19:02:16 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 24 May 2010 19:02:16 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>May 24, 2010</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Cameron McKenzie</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>prices to go up !</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=60211</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<p>ok.</p>...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 24 May 2010 17:35:20 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 24 May 2010 17:35:20 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 24 May 2010 17:35:20 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>May 24, 2010</jf:date>
        <jf:author>shawn spencer</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>6</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>IBM Cleans Up as AT&amp;#38;T Takes a $2.5 Billion Bath</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=60211</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<p>Purchased for $3.9 billion at the height of the tech boom in 2000, AT&amp;T just sold off Sterling Commerce to IBM for $1.4 billion in pocket change.</p>...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 24 May 2010 10:04:50 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 24 May 2010 10:04:50 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 24 May 2010 10:04:50 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>May 24, 2010</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Cameron McKenzie</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>8</jf:replyCount>
    </item>



</channel>
</rss>

