Support Forums: Message List - Azul: Fixing What's Wrong with the Java Virtual Machine http://www.theserverside.com Most recent forum messages en Jive Forums Silver 5.5.30 (www.jivesoftware.com) Sun, 26 May 2013 00:05:40 -0400 A bit more information on managed runtimes and the Open Source http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=60425 Here's some info on Azul's Open Source initiative, along with more information on the garbage collection issue with the Java Virtual Machine (JVM)

...]]> Thu, 01 Jul 2010 10:57:35 -0400 Thu, 01 Jul 2010 10:57:35 -0400 Thu, 01 Jul 2010 10:57:35 -0400 Jul 1, 2010 Cameron McKenzie 0 Azul: Fixing What's Wrong with the Java Virtual Machine http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=60425 So, let's bash the JVM.

It's rigid. It's non-elastic. It's fixed in its limited size. It can't dynamically scale up or down. It's heavily constrained by the OS.

It's inefficient. It's unstable...]]> Thu, 01 Jul 2010 10:55:52 -0400 Tue, 22 Jun 2010 09:37:44 -0400 Thu, 01 Jul 2010 10:55:52 -0400 Jul 1, 2010 Cameron McKenzie 10 Azul: Fixing What's Wrong with the Java Virtual Machine http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=60425 Does this mean that this platform can help reduce frequent lock contention costs, improve thread scheduling, suspension/interuption etc etc...?

 

]]> Wed, 30 Jun 2010 04:20:34 -0400 Wed, 30 Jun 2010 04:20:34 -0400 Wed, 30 Jun 2010 04:20:34 -0400 Jun 30, 2010 Kristoffer Sjögren 0 I'm about http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=60425 no pricing == very expensive

]]> Wed, 23 Jun 2010 15:34:47 -0400 Wed, 23 Jun 2010 15:34:47 -0400 Wed, 23 Jun 2010 15:34:47 -0400 Jun 23, 2010 sloppyseconds 0 I'm about http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=60425 ready to boycot all products that don't give pricing on their web site.

 

very lame

]]> Wed, 23 Jun 2010 14:58:58 -0400 Wed, 23 Jun 2010 14:58:58 -0400 Wed, 23 Jun 2010 14:58:58 -0400 Jun 23, 2010 Matt Giacomini 1 Fixing what's wrong with TheSererSide.com http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=60425 Let's bash this Site and this News-Post: Years ago TheServerSide.com was a valuable source for Enterprise Java. But more and more it becomes a platform for advertising and propaganda in the form of articles and posts.

...]]> Wed, 23 Jun 2010 05:11:53 -0400 Wed, 23 Jun 2010 05:11:53 -0400 Wed, 23 Jun 2010 05:11:53 -0400 Jun 23, 2010 Marco Noname 0 Azul: Fixing What's Wrong with the Java Virtual Machine http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=60425 Break barries in Java application performance, and great open source initiative, http://www.managedruntime.org

]]> Wed, 23 Jun 2010 02:35:07 -0400 Wed, 23 Jun 2010 02:35:07 -0400 Wed, 23 Jun 2010 02:35:07 -0400 Jun 23, 2010 Gurkan Erdogdu 0 That sounds promising http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=60425 I had no idea about this. Great initiative; I'm checking it out!

]]> Tue, 22 Jun 2010 18:29:40 -0400 Tue, 22 Jun 2010 18:29:40 -0400 Tue, 22 Jun 2010 18:29:40 -0400 Jun 22, 2010 Wojciech Kudla 0 The Azul Managed Runtime http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=60425 Indeed, the Zing solution is an Azul solution, but the managed runtime initiative by Azul also holds a great deal of promise for solving this very issue as well. And the managed runtime initiative isn't proprietary. Check it out!

]]> Tue, 22 Jun 2010 16:52:47 -0400 Tue, 22 Jun 2010 16:52:47 -0400 Tue, 22 Jun 2010 16:52:47 -0400 Jun 22, 2010 Cameron McKenzie 1 Re: Yet another proprietary solution http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=60425 I'm not sure if this addresses all of your concerns but Azul just open-sourced some of their proprietary technologies:

http://www.managedruntime.org/

]]> Tue, 22 Jun 2010 15:24:50 -0400 Tue, 22 Jun 2010 15:24:50 -0400 Tue, 22 Jun 2010 15:24:50 -0400 Jun 22, 2010 James Watson 3 Yet another proprietary solution http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=60425 Of course it's free to evaluate and test for a sensible amount of time, or is it?

...]]> Tue, 22 Jun 2010 10:42:20 -0400 Tue, 22 Jun 2010 10:42:20 -0400 Tue, 22 Jun 2010 10:42:20 -0400 Jun 22, 2010 Wojciech Kudla 4