http://www.theserverside.com Most recent forum messages en Jive Forums Silver 5.5.30 (www.jivesoftware.com) Tue, 21 May 2013 13:32:12 -0400 http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=60845 Wed, 08 Sep 2010 20:16:36 -0400 Wed, 08 Sep 2010 20:16:36 -0400 Wed, 08 Sep 2010 20:16:36 -0400 Sep 8, 2010 Serguei Mourachov 0 http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=60845 ...]]> Wed, 08 Sep 2010 06:31:09 -0400 Wed, 08 Sep 2010 06:31:09 -0400 Wed, 08 Sep 2010 06:31:09 -0400 Sep 8, 2010 Dirk Ludwig 0 http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=60845 ...]]> Tue, 07 Sep 2010 17:09:35 -0400 Tue, 07 Sep 2010 17:09:35 -0400 Tue, 07 Sep 2010 17:09:35 -0400 Sep 7, 2010 James Watson 1 http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=60845 The statement has a typo, as you can see from the relevant link address, the temporary object mentioned is not obviously a String but a StringBuffer/StringBuilder

]]> Tue, 07 Sep 2010 17:01:53 -0400 Tue, 07 Sep 2010 17:01:53 -0400 Tue, 07 Sep 2010 17:01:53 -0400 Sep 7, 2010 Byron Kiourtzoglou 2 http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=60845 ...]]> Tue, 07 Sep 2010 16:51:32 -0400 Tue, 07 Sep 2010 16:51:32 -0400 Tue, 07 Sep 2010 16:51:32 -0400 Sep 7, 2010 Byron Kiourtzoglou 3 http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=60845 ...]]> Tue, 07 Sep 2010 16:15:52 -0400 Tue, 07 Sep 2010 16:15:52 -0400 Tue, 07 Sep 2010 16:15:52 -0400 Sep 7, 2010 peter lin 0 http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=60845 ...]]> Tue, 07 Sep 2010 15:33:13 -0400 Tue, 07 Sep 2010 15:33:13 -0400 Tue, 07 Sep 2010 15:33:13 -0400 Sep 7, 2010 James Watson 4 http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=60845 ...]]> Tue, 07 Sep 2010 15:00:43 -0400 Tue, 07 Sep 2010 15:00:43 -0400 Tue, 07 Sep 2010 15:00:43 -0400 Sep 7, 2010 Byron Kiourtzoglou 0 http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=60845 ...]]> Tue, 07 Sep 2010 14:21:53 -0400 Tue, 07 Sep 2010 14:21:53 -0400 Tue, 07 Sep 2010 14:21:53 -0400 Sep 7, 2010 Byron Kiourtzoglou 5 http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=60845 For the String concatenation, as pointed out by Dirk, the + operator will actually result in equivalent bytecodes to the StringBuilder approach in many cases.  As I note, in some cases it actually eliminates the concatenation entirely.

...]]> Tue, 07 Sep 2010 14:09:13 -0400 Tue, 07 Sep 2010 14:09:13 -0400 Tue, 07 Sep 2010 14:09:13 -0400 Sep 7, 2010 James Watson 1 http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=60845 ...]]> Tue, 07 Sep 2010 13:49:39 -0400 Tue, 07 Sep 2010 13:49:39 -0400 Tue, 07 Sep 2010 13:49:39 -0400 Sep 7, 2010 James Watson 0 http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=60845 So if I understand well, the authors, after having implemented tons of exotics Exact String Matching algorithms, determined that the best performer for the 99.999% cases is: the Java naïve String.indexOf() !

]]> Tue, 07 Sep 2010 13:21:20 -0400 Tue, 07 Sep 2010 13:21:20 -0400 Tue, 07 Sep 2010 13:21:20 -0400 Sep 7, 2010 zart colwin 1 http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=60845 From the article:

...]]> Tue, 07 Sep 2010 10:04:32 -0400 Tue, 07 Sep 2010 10:04:32 -0400 Tue, 07 Sep 2010 10:04:32 -0400 Sep 7, 2010 Dirk Ludwig 7 http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=60845 Continuing our series of articles concerning proposed practices while working with the Java programming language, we are going to talk about String performance tuning. We will focus on how to handle String creation, String alteration and String...]]> Mon, 06 Sep 2010 03:48:36 -0400 Mon, 06 Sep 2010 03:48:36 -0400 Mon, 06 Sep 2010 03:48:36 -0400 Sep 6, 2010 Byron Kiourtzoglou 13