Support Forums: Message List - What's wrong with OpenID? http://www.theserverside.com Most recent forum messages en Jive Forums Silver 5.5.30 (www.jivesoftware.com) Tue, 18 Jun 2013 21:12:42 -0400 open id http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=61397 i hate it when OpenId goes down

 the stork club movie

]]> Thu, 25 Oct 2012 04:45:39 -0400 Thu, 25 Oct 2012 04:45:39 -0400 Thu, 25 Oct 2012 04:45:39 -0400 Oct 25, 2012 club stork 0 open id http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=61397 i hate it too when something goes wrong w/ Open ID graphic designer holiday gifts

]]> Wed, 10 Oct 2012 02:33:27 -0400 Wed, 10 Oct 2012 02:33:27 -0400 Wed, 10 Oct 2012 02:33:27 -0400 Oct 10, 2012 colemanworks 0 re: What's wrong with OpenID? (addendum) http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=61397 OK, I see. Still this does not explain the annoyance of the commenter, does it? After all, if you manage 2 or 3 identities corresponding to 2 or 3 OpenID accounts, thats *much much* better than managing dozens or maybe even hundreds of individual...]]> Thu, 09 Dec 2010 04:08:26 -0500 Thu, 09 Dec 2010 04:08:26 -0500 Thu, 09 Dec 2010 04:08:26 -0500 Dec 9, 2010 hstoerr 0 re: What's wrong with OpenID? (addendum) http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=61397 Its a good point and one that the SSO industry has been working on for a while.  Its called "User Centric Identity" and its covers by the "Laws of Identity" by Kim Cameron.  Unfortunatly technology has not been very effective at managing...]]> Wed, 01 Dec 2010 12:09:04 -0500 Wed, 01 Dec 2010 12:09:04 -0500 Wed, 01 Dec 2010 12:09:04 -0500 Dec 1, 2010 Marc Boorshtein 0 re: What's wrong with OpenID? (addendum) http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=61397 I don't know much about OpenID, but what if you don't want a single ID for all your forum posting habits? What if you don't want your programming forum ID tied to your political forum ID?

...]]> Wed, 01 Dec 2010 08:59:35 -0500 Wed, 01 Dec 2010 08:59:35 -0500 Wed, 01 Dec 2010 08:59:35 -0500 Dec 1, 2010 Andres F. 2 What's wrong with OpenID? (addendum) http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=61397 On second thought, I wonder why this user and at least another one in the cited comments felt the need to use multiple OpenID providers. Why? Didn't they understand that exactly one is sufficient, or is there another reason I fail to see?

]]> Wed, 01 Dec 2010 06:55:37 -0500 Wed, 01 Dec 2010 06:55:37 -0500 Wed, 01 Dec 2010 06:55:37 -0500 Dec 1, 2010 hstoerr 3 Registration count and ease of use http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=61397 ...]]> Wed, 01 Dec 2010 06:45:00 -0500 Wed, 01 Dec 2010 06:45:00 -0500 Wed, 01 Dec 2010 06:45:00 -0500 Dec 1, 2010 hstoerr 0 openid is actually remarkably successful http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=61397 SAML Deployment:

...]]> Tue, 30 Nov 2010 15:34:51 -0500 Tue, 30 Nov 2010 15:34:51 -0500 Tue, 30 Nov 2010 15:34:51 -0500 Nov 30, 2010 Marc Boorshtein 0 openid is actually remarkably successful http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=61397 Basically there are only three choices on the web when it comes to identity:

...]]> Tue, 30 Nov 2010 14:42:32 -0500 Tue, 30 Nov 2010 14:42:32 -0500 Tue, 30 Nov 2010 14:42:32 -0500 Nov 30, 2010 jilles van gurp 1 What's wrong with OpenID? http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=61397 OpenID + OAuth is SAML without cryptographic trust validation.  For posting blog comments and basic personalization its fine.  For use with anything that requires a pre-established trust that can't be spoofed, reverse engineered or subject...]]> Tue, 30 Nov 2010 13:40:39 -0500 Tue, 30 Nov 2010 13:40:39 -0500 Tue, 30 Nov 2010 13:40:39 -0500 Nov 30, 2010 Marc Boorshtein 0 What's wrong with OpenID? http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=61397 Asked on quora.com, "What's wrong with OpenID?" resulted in a one-line answer: "It hasn't taken over the world." That's true - and for such a general solution you'd want it...]]> Tue, 30 Nov 2010 05:33:35 -0500 Tue, 30 Nov 2010 05:33:35 -0500 Tue, 30 Nov 2010 05:33:35 -0500 Nov 30, 2010 RMayhew 10