Support Forums: Message List - Java - Lambda Syntax Alternatives http://www.theserverside.com Most recent forum messages en Jive Forums Silver 5.5.30 (www.jivesoftware.com) Wed, 22 May 2013 19:41:47 -0400 You don't need the types when they can be inferred http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=62487 ...]]> Mon, 27 Jun 2011 07:23:35 -0400 Mon, 27 Jun 2011 07:23:35 -0400 Mon, 27 Jun 2011 07:23:35 -0400 Jun 27, 2011 Denis Bredelet 0 Comparable type http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=62487 Shouldn't that be "V extends Comparable<V>"?

Unless I misunderstand the usage of your "sort".

]]> Mon, 27 Jun 2011 07:18:29 -0400 Mon, 27 Jun 2011 07:18:29 -0400 Mon, 27 Jun 2011 07:18:29 -0400 Jun 27, 2011 Denis Bredelet 0 Java - Lambda Syntax Alternatives http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=62487 I think calling Java simple is absurd. Java is a language for professionals, so the added complexity of closures does not hurt too much. (It does not beat the complexity of, generics or thread safety.) And in many areas it will help a lot, because...]]> Tue, 21 Jun 2011 14:40:30 -0400 Tue, 21 Jun 2011 14:40:30 -0400 Tue, 21 Jun 2011 14:40:30 -0400 Jun 21, 2011 hstoerr 0 Java - Lambda Syntax Alternatives http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=62487 Closure can help writing clean, readable code too. I really miss them in java...

]]> Fri, 17 Jun 2011 02:09:29 -0400 Fri, 17 Jun 2011 02:09:29 -0400 Fri, 17 Jun 2011 02:09:29 -0400 Jun 17, 2011 Olivier Carnal 0 You don't need the types when they can be inferred http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=62487 ...]]> Wed, 15 Jun 2011 23:47:35 -0400 Wed, 15 Jun 2011 23:47:35 -0400 Wed, 15 Jun 2011 23:47:35 -0400 Jun 15, 2011 Steven Peh 0 You don't need the types when they can be inferred http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=62487 ...]]> Tue, 14 Jun 2011 23:31:47 -0400 Tue, 14 Jun 2011 23:31:47 -0400 Tue, 14 Jun 2011 23:31:47 -0400 Jun 14, 2011 Michael McCutcheon 2 Java - Lambda Syntax Alternatives http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=62487 ...]]> Tue, 14 Jun 2011 23:15:17 -0400 Tue, 14 Jun 2011 23:15:17 -0400 Tue, 14 Jun 2011 23:15:17 -0400 Jun 14, 2011 Michael McCutcheon 2 Java - Lambda Syntax Alternatives http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=62487 now THAT makes java start to look ugly !

]]> Tue, 14 Jun 2011 15:36:48 -0400 Tue, 14 Jun 2011 15:36:48 -0400 Tue, 14 Jun 2011 15:36:48 -0400 Jun 14, 2011 zart colwin 3 You don't need the types when they can be inferred http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=62487 This applies to all of them, but I will demonstrate with the one that I like :)

...]]> Tue, 14 Jun 2011 00:13:48 -0400 Tue, 14 Jun 2011 00:13:48 -0400 Tue, 14 Jun 2011 00:13:48 -0400 Jun 14, 2011 spullara 3 And in Scala it is... http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=62487 Here it is in Scala, with some nice features to boot:

...]]> Mon, 13 Jun 2011 20:47:39 -0400 Mon, 13 Jun 2011 20:47:39 -0400 Mon, 13 Jun 2011 20:47:39 -0400 Jun 13, 2011 Brian Maso 0 Java - Lambda Syntax Alternatives http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=62487 The discussion on the lambda-dev mailing list has started to address the issue of what the Java language syntax for lambdas / function literals ought to look like. Let's look at a slightly non-trivial example and try to tease the issues out.

...]]> Mon, 13 Jun 2011 09:44:59 -0400 Mon, 13 Jun 2011 09:44:59 -0400 Mon, 13 Jun 2011 09:44:59 -0400 Jun 13, 2011 Martijn Verburg 10