Support Forums: Message List - Do we really need another framework to Play with? 2.0 is out with a curfew.

Play 2.0 announcement translated to spanish

Tue, 03 Jan 2012 08:40:43 -0500

for spanish speaking developers out there here's the play! 2.0 translated announcement

...

... an on going effort for perfection

Mon, 03 Oct 2011 00:28:31 -0400

...

Do we really need another framework to Play with? 2.0 is out with a curfew.

Mon, 12 Sep 2011 18:03:51 -0400

...

There's always room for improvement!

Mon, 12 Sep 2011 10:38:29 -0400

REST makes sense for web applications. JavaScript makes sense for web applications. REST on the server and JavaScript for interactive clients make sense for targeting both web browsers and mobile devices. There is still a need for pluggable...

Do we really need another framework to Play with? 2.0 is out with a curfew.

Mon, 12 Sep 2011 10:23:57 -0400

I just spent about an hour reading the Play website and I realized that I need to spend more hours on it to understand why it doesn't use/follow the maven structures (how Play provides basic features that maven does, like library dependency...

Keep it simple: just use Java EE 6

Sun, 11 Sep 2011 15:38:57 -0400

...

playframework

Fri, 09 Sep 2011 15:14:45 -0400

I Just have to say playframeworks ROCKS!

Yes!

Fri, 09 Sep 2011 04:07:14 -0400

Despite it's name, Play isn't really a web framework. It's more of a web application platform for Java and Scala.

...

Do we really need another framework to Play with? 2.0 is out with a curfew.

Thu, 08 Sep 2011 15:00:55 -0400

I'm normally a wicket guy. In fact, I still consider myself a wicket guy. But I *have* used play and it is awesome. It's for building a different kind of app in many ways than wicket so I don't feel (too) guilty about saying that....

Do we really need another framework to Play with? 2.0 is out with a curfew.

Thu, 08 Sep 2011 12:20:57 -0400

Play 2.0 is out. But it's got a curfew.

...