http://www.theserverside.com Most recent forum messages en Jive Forums Silver 5.5.30 (www.jivesoftware.com) Thu, 20 Jun 2013 07:22:32 -0400 http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=765 Thu, 12 Oct 2000 14:52:21 -0400 Thu, 12 Oct 2000 14:52:21 -0400 Thu, 12 Oct 2000 14:52:21 -0400 Oct 12, 2000 Andy Liu 0 http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=765 Wed, 11 Oct 2000 19:26:47 -0400 Wed, 11 Oct 2000 19:26:47 -0400 Wed, 11 Oct 2000 19:26:47 -0400 Oct 11, 2000 Scott Hasse 0 http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=765
In my message about caches on every level, I meant caches in general. I wasn't talking about having instances of the same cache in each level.

Erik
]]> Wed, 13 Sep 2000 13:07:26 -0400 Wed, 13 Sep 2000 13:07:26 -0400 Wed, 13 Sep 2000 13:07:26 -0400 Sep 13, 2000 Erik van Zijst 1 http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=765 Wed, 13 Sep 2000 12:55:56 -0400 Wed, 13 Sep 2000 12:55:56 -0400 Wed, 13 Sep 2000 12:55:56 -0400 Sep 13, 2000 Eugen Bulboaca 3 http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=765 Wed, 13 Sep 2000 09:38:34 -0400 Wed, 13 Sep 2000 09:38:34 -0400 Wed, 13 Sep 2000 09:38:34 -0400 Sep 13, 2000 Erik van Zijst 4 http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=765 Wed, 13 Sep 2000 07:57:07 -0400 Wed, 13 Sep 2000 07:57:07 -0400 Wed, 13 Sep 2000 07:57:07 -0400 Sep 13, 2000 Rod Johnson 5 http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=765 Sun, 10 Sep 2000 19:09:20 -0400 Sun, 10 Sep 2000 19:09:20 -0400 Sun, 10 Sep 2000 19:09:20 -0400 Sep 10, 2000 Dimitri Rakitine 0 http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=765
But what about a singleton cache undermining the main purpose of clustering: failsafety? What if the VM containing the singleton in a cluster crashes?

Gene
]]> Sun, 10 Sep 2000 05:54:42 -0400 Sun, 10 Sep 2000 05:54:42 -0400 Sun, 10 Sep 2000 05:54:42 -0400 Sep 10, 2000 Gene Chuang 7 http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=765 Fri, 08 Sep 2000 13:35:23 -0400 Fri, 08 Sep 2000 13:35:23 -0400 Fri, 08 Sep 2000 13:35:23 -0400 Sep 8, 2000 Dimitri Rakitine 8 http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=765 Fri, 08 Sep 2000 09:51:11 -0400 Fri, 08 Sep 2000 09:51:11 -0400 Fri, 08 Sep 2000 09:51:11 -0400 Sep 8, 2000 Erik van Zijst 9 http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=765
Using singletons in a clustered enviroment is a bad idea, so RMI should be used instead.]]> Wed, 06 Sep 2000 15:21:21 -0400 Wed, 06 Sep 2000 15:21:21 -0400 Wed, 06 Sep 2000 15:21:21 -0400 Sep 6, 2000 Dimitri Rakitine 10 http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=765 Wed, 06 Sep 2000 03:07:50 -0400 Wed, 06 Sep 2000 03:07:50 -0400 Wed, 06 Sep 2000 03:07:50 -0400 Sep 6, 2000 Gene Chuang 11 http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=765
Of course. Since there's only one instance, your threads can access it simultaneously. So you'll have to make sure you synchronize data manipulation.

Erik
]]> Mon, 04 Sep 2000 04:46:59 -0400 Mon, 04 Sep 2000 04:46:59 -0400 Mon, 04 Sep 2000 04:46:59 -0400 Sep 4, 2000 Erik van Zijst 12 http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=765 Sat, 02 Sep 2000 13:18:52 -0400 Sat, 02 Sep 2000 13:18:52 -0400 Sat, 02 Sep 2000 13:18:52 -0400 Sep 2, 2000 Justin Echternach 13 http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=765 Fri, 01 Sep 2000 14:02:31 -0400 Fri, 01 Sep 2000 14:02:31 -0400 Fri, 01 Sep 2000 14:02:31 -0400 Sep 1, 2000 Daniel Davison 0