Do you have any recommendations based on personal experience for a JMS provider that "works good" with WebSphere 4.0?
- Posted by: jeff kennedy
- Posted on: December 10 2001 18:16 EST
- JMS Provider Recommendations by David Hanna on December 11 2001 18:14 EST
- JMS Provider Recommendations by Danny B on December 12 2001 17:38 EST
We've been using MQ with IBM's JMS implementation without any problems.
Thank you David! That is good news! We will plan on evaluating their product. I am highly disappointed IBM doesn't have a message bean solution yet. I will be looking at a work around to this...asynchronous session bean calls... Thanks again!
They sort of do. While WAS 4.0 does not support the EJB 2.0 spec, they have a kindof MDB solution. I think they call it WebSphere Enterprise Services and it's probably only available in the Enterprise edition of WAS 4.0. This might start you in the right direction.
I haven't had a chance to play with it yet, so I don't know how well it works.
Thanks so much Dave! I will check it out!
I've used SonicMQ, FioranaMQ, and Spirit-Soft. I strongly recommend SonicMQ by Progress Software. Is a proven JMS implementation. Additionally, their support staff is simply awesome. They're willing to help anytime, anywhere. If there's a problem with the product, they work continuously until it is fixed.
I have no relation to Progress Software. I just think their product rocks.
Thanks Dan! SonicMQ is on my radar screen. Have you used it with WebSphere?
We currently have WAS 4.0 Advanced Edition, so I need to compare WAS 4.0 Ent. Edition's solution (Dave mentioned) vs. the messaging products.