Any opinion on simple Messenger facade for JMS from Apache/commons?
Did anybody use it in real application development?
Any issues with it? Pro Cons. Is it worth to use?
Can anybody suggest good facade or interface based abstraction framework for JMS 1.1?
Connection/Session Pooling, Subscription, Threading, namespace, destination and payload versioning, ect. issues
http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/jakarta/commons/sandbox/messenger/
"Messenger is a facade over the JMS API making it easy to use JMS and hiding much of the complexity of reading and configuration. A Messenger will internally associate a JMS Session with the calling thread so that all methods called in the same thread (such as inside a Servlet or taglib) will use the same JMS Session."
-
Any opinion on simple Messenger facade for JMS from Apache? (1 messages)
- Posted by: Glen Klyuzner
- Posted on: April 19 2005 12:13 EDT
Threaded Messages (1)
- Apache's JMS Messenger facade or JMS layer from Spring? by Glen Klyuzner on April 19 2005 15:26 EDT
-
Apache's JMS Messenger facade or JMS layer from Spring?[ Go to top ]
- Posted by: Glen Klyuzner
- Posted on: April 19 2005 15:26 EDT
- in response to Glen Klyuzner
I found SpiritWave JMS provider was using Apache's Messenger.
Spring framework aslo could be used as JMS facade.