Martin Fink has written an article on the issues of hiring open source developers, and how to hire good open source developers. This comes at a time where there is a lot of discussion in the industry on the cost of open source.
Read How to hire great open source developers
The infamous letter from Clemens Vasters to a young open source developer.
Cedric's response
Personally, I think that the middle ground is normally a good one. Open source != the best solution all the time, however it may be. There are many items that you have to think about when you select a piece of software, and the open/closed cost is one of many attributes that should be considered.
-
Opinion: How to hire great open source developers (19 messages)
- Posted by: Dion Almaer
- Posted on: March 03 2004 13:27 EST
Threaded Messages (19)
- How to Interview a Programmer by Sean Sullivan on March 03 2004 13:33 EST
- you can have both by Bill Burke on March 03 2004 14:29 EST
- Rent Money by Ricky Datta on March 03 2004 14:53 EST
- the missing part by Rolf Tollerud on March 03 2004 15:19 EST
-
the missing part by Jason McKerr on March 03 2004 03:35 EST
-
the missing part by Rolf Tollerud on March 03 2004 03:57 EST
-
the missing part by Jason McKerr on March 03 2004 05:17 EST
-
the missing part by Jason McKerr on March 03 2004 05:18 EST
-
the missing part by Rolf Tollerud on March 03 2004 05:58 EST
-
the missing part by Mark N on March 03 2004 09:11 EST
-
what is more creditable? by Rolf Tollerud on March 03 2004 10:21 EST
-
what is more creditable? by Mark N on March 03 2004 11:13 EST
-
Microsoft, the biggest organized crime of all? by Rolf Tollerud on March 03 2004 11:40 EST
- Microsoft, the biggest organized crime of all? by Mark N on March 04 2004 10:44 EST
-
Microsoft, the biggest organized crime of all? by Rolf Tollerud on March 03 2004 11:40 EST
-
what is more creditable? by Mark N on March 03 2004 11:13 EST
-
what is more creditable? by Rolf Tollerud on March 03 2004 10:21 EST
-
the missing part by Mark N on March 03 2004 09:11 EST
-
the missing part by Rolf Tollerud on March 03 2004 05:58 EST
-
the missing part by Jason McKerr on March 03 2004 05:18 EST
-
the missing part by Jason McKerr on March 03 2004 05:17 EST
-
the missing part by Rolf Tollerud on March 03 2004 03:57 EST
-
the missing part by Jason McKerr on March 03 2004 03:35 EST
- you can have both by Brian Miller on March 03 2004 16:23 EST
- you can have both by Clemens Vasters on March 05 2004 04:20 EST
- you can have both by Tom Fennelly on March 08 2004 09:02 EST
- RE: you can have both by Simon Harris on March 03 2004 17:43 EST
- Opinion: How to hire great open source developers by Mike Spille on March 03 2004 17:01 EST
-
How to Interview a Programmer[ Go to top ]
- Posted by: Sean Sullivan
- Posted on: March 03 2004 13:33 EST
- in response to Dion Almaer
How to Interview a Programmer
http://www.artima.com/wbc/interprog.html -
you can have both[ Go to top ]
- Posted by: Bill Burke
- Posted on: March 03 2004 14:29 EST
- in response to Dion Almaer
Never heard of the "infamous letter from Clemens Vasters...", but he states
"In the end, Aiden, its your choice. Do you want to have a car, a house and a family when you are 30? Do you love being a software engineer at the same time? If so, you literally need to get a life. Forget the dream about stuff being free and stop advocating it. Its idiocy. Its bigotry. If you want to put your skills to work and you need to support a family, your work and work results cant be free. Software is the immediate result and the manifestation of what your learned and what you know. How much is that worth? Nothing? Think again."
Hmmmm... Let's see, I'm 33, I have a house, a wife, a kid which I am the sole supporter. I've got a car, so does my wife. I even have a dog and a cat. I contribute to OSS about 80% of my time( both work and free time) and I get paid for it and I am not a communist. Aiden needs to drop his pony-tail, commie attitude. Clemens needs to learn a little idealism.
Bill -
Rent Money[ Go to top ]
- Posted by: Ricky Datta
- Posted on: March 03 2004 14:53 EST
- in response to Bill Burke
What pays your rent money ? (or 80 % of it ) -
the missing part[ Go to top ]
- Posted by: Rolf Tollerud
- Posted on: March 03 2004 15:19 EST
- in response to Bill Burke
Clemens forgot to add: But if you already are a part of an Open Source project, watch your back, be more manipulative, crafty, cunning and insidious in a skillful manner than even Machiavelli and a beautiful day you will wake up and discover that you have succeeded in cheating your fellow project citizens and you are now in charge and owner of the project.
Regards
Rolf Tollerud -
the missing part[ Go to top ]
- Posted by: Jason McKerr
- Posted on: March 03 2004 15:35 EST
- in response to Rolf Tollerud
Rolf,
What in the world are you talking about man? That statement doesn't even make sense. But it seems you're comparing Open Source developers to Machiavelli. Who are we cheating Rolf?
Anyway, I, like Bill, am employed almost entirely on the basis of Open Source. My group hosts large Open Source projects, conducts Open Source development, and has a host of other services. We're all still getting paid to do our jobs, and we've got projects coming in. We're having fun too.
Jason McKerr
The Open Source Lab
"Open Minds. Open Doors. Open Source." -
the missing part[ Go to top ]
- Posted by: Rolf Tollerud
- Posted on: March 03 2004 15:57 EST
- in response to Jason McKerr
Please Jason, I am 100% sure that you are completly honest and a certified idealist. But what you should need is a gram of cynicism. JBoss and The Open Source Lab have only the name "Open Source" in common- nothing else.
Regards
Rolf Tollerud -
the missing part[ Go to top ]
- Posted by: Jason McKerr
- Posted on: March 03 2004 17:17 EST
- in response to Rolf Tollerud
Rolf,
That's funny, I don't see "Open Source" in "JBoss." Just kidding with you.
In reality though JBoss probably *will* make money assuming management and leadership is god and services quality. But remember, it's really a service company. In many ways, so is the Open Source Lab (except we're non-profit).
One of the mistakes people keep making is that Open Source drives software economies to services rather than products. IBM was quite prescient in this, recognized it early, and shifted resources to support these services. They're making a fortune off it now. So many people say, "How can it create economic value if it's free?" And they say that with "product" tinted glasses on (although there are people making money off productization as well, I suppose). Economic value is created, now, for parties other than the software vendors.
Jason McKerr
The Open Source Lab
"Open Minds. Open Doors. Open Source." -
the missing part[ Go to top ]
- Posted by: Jason McKerr
- Posted on: March 03 2004 17:18 EST
- in response to Jason McKerr
oops. I meant, "assuming management and leadership is GOOD and services quality"
Don't let that one go to your head! :)
Jason McKerr
The Open Source Lab
"Open Minds. Open Doors. Open Source." -
the missing part[ Go to top ]
- Posted by: Rolf Tollerud
- Posted on: March 03 2004 17:58 EST
- in response to Jason McKerr
Must be a Freudian slip :)
Anyhow, all reports point in the same direction, Marc Fleury is a terrible leader..
People always think success == must be good management.
That is of course not true, many organized crime businesses have had successes too..
Regards
Rolf Tollerud -
the missing part[ Go to top ]
- Posted by: Mark N
- Posted on: March 03 2004 21:11 EST
- in response to Rolf Tollerud
People always think success == must be good management.
> That is of course not true, many organized crime businesses have had successes too..
Ok, I won't go for the obvious one.
Anyway, depends on how you define success and good management. -
what is more creditable?[ Go to top ]
- Posted by: Rolf Tollerud
- Posted on: March 03 2004 22:21 EST
- in response to Mark N
I will not accuse Mr Fleury for organized crime of course.
(But organized crime would be more creditable than the business he have now! :)
Regards
Rolf Tollerud -
what is more creditable?[ Go to top ]
- Posted by: Mark N
- Posted on: March 03 2004 23:13 EST
- in response to Rolf Tollerud
Not the one I was going for. :) Don't really know how to comment on yours so I won't. -
Microsoft, the biggest organized crime of all?[ Go to top ]
- Posted by: Rolf Tollerud
- Posted on: March 03 2004 23:40 EST
- in response to Mark N
You disappoint me Mark, I got the hint the first time!
You must credit your opponents with as much intelligence so as they can understand when they are insulted! (You thought that I was getting it, but was just a little tiny worried that it has passed me by :)
Actually I was not insulted. For me hypocrisy (a la Marc) is worse than any real crime.
Regards
Rolf Tollerud -
Microsoft, the biggest organized crime of all?[ Go to top ]
- Posted by: Mark N
- Posted on: March 04 2004 10:44 EST
- in response to Rolf Tollerud
You disappoint me Mark, I got the hint the first time!
Figured you did. Way too obvious. I wouldn't saw they are they biggest of all time. Just the irony of "the pot calling the kettle black". Sort of.
>
> You must credit your opponents with as much intelligence so as they can understand when they are insulted! (You thought that I was getting it, but was just a little tiny worried that it has passed me by :)
>
Wasn't an attempt to insult you. I just wasn't willing to let go that you didn't take the bait.
BTW, have fun with your "opponent" in the .Net discussions. Been there, done that and as much as I disagree with alot of what you say - you have my sympathy. -
you can have both[ Go to top ]
- Posted by: Brian Miller
- Posted on: March 03 2004 16:23 EST
- in response to Bill Burke
Let's see, I'm 33, I have a house, a wife, a kid which I am the sole supporter. I've got a car, so does my wife. I even have a dog and a cat. I contribute to OSS about 80% of my time( both work and free time) and I get paid for it and I am not a communist. Aiden needs to drop his pony-tail, commie attitude. Clemens needs to learn a little idealism.
Agreed entirely. My life is very similar. My employer's products are all open source and free of charge. My employer is entirely funded by incubator grants from Uncle Scam. Freeware is here to stay and monotonicly gaining market share. Clemens is a dork. -
you can have both[ Go to top ]
- Posted by: Clemens Vasters
- Posted on: March 05 2004 04:20 EST
- in response to Brian Miller
Clemens is a dork.
Your professional attitude is very much appreciated. -
you can have both[ Go to top ]
- Posted by: Tom Fennelly
- Posted on: March 08 2004 09:02 EST
- in response to Brian Miller
In all fairness to Clemens, is it not obvious that he is not referring to organisations that make money indirectly from software they give away for free. The basic premise of his argument would seem fair enough to me i.e. software comes at a price of one kind or another, either to the person writing it (if they cant pay their bills at the end of the month), or to the person buying it. Not so sure about his conspiracy theories re corporate encouragement of open source for their own selfish goals maybe I read that wrong though J
Clemens, are you sure Aiden wasnt lying about his name and age? You sure he wasnt an elderly bloke with a big beard, first name Richard, second name Stallman? Bad Irish humour hehehehe -
RE: you can have both[ Go to top ]
- Posted by: Simon Harris
- Posted on: March 03 2004 17:43 EST
- in response to Bill Burke
FWIW, a pony tailed commie wouldn't be espousing capitilist sentiment now would he ;-) But I digress... -
Opinion: How to hire great open source developers[ Go to top ]
- Posted by: Mike Spille
- Posted on: March 03 2004 17:01 EST
- in response to Dion Almaer
Make alot of money penetrating marks and offer some options?
-Mike