Compuware has unveiled version 4.0 of its OptimalJ enterprise Java development environment, which includes a new developer edition for Eclipse. All future version of OptimalJ, which supports model-driven archicture (MDA) development, will be built on Eclipse. Compuware has also launched a Pattern Plaza, an online exchange that enables architects to share OptimalJ transformation patterns and collaborate on implementation improvements.
Find out more here.
-
Compuware OptimalJ 4.0 adds Eclipse support (3 messages)
- Posted by: Nitin Bharti
- Posted on: August 05 2005 10:52 EDT
Threaded Messages (3)
- Market share? by Yoav Shapira on August 05 2005 19:03 EDT
- Market share? by Greg Ritchie on August 08 2005 22:02 EDT
- MDA, code-generation and OptimalJ by Gerald Loeffler on August 09 2005 05:04 EDT
-
Market share?[ Go to top ]
- Posted by: Yoav Shapira
- Posted on: August 05 2005 19:03 EDT
- in response to Nitin Bharti
What is OptimalJ's market share among Java IDEs? -
Market share?[ Go to top ]
- Posted by: Greg Ritchie
- Posted on: August 08 2005 22:02 EDT
- in response to Yoav Shapira
What is OptimalJ's market share among Java IDEs?
OJ isn't an IDE so much as a design tool. I don't think any MDA tool has garnered much in terms of market share. Mind share is open for debate I guess, but judging by the level of interest in this news story I'd say we have our answer. Compuware has invested a lot in OJ, but it hasn't exactly taken hold (yet anyway). -
MDA, code-generation and OptimalJ[ Go to top ]
- Posted by: Gerald Loeffler
- Posted on: August 09 2005 05:04 EDT
- in response to Nitin Bharti
In my mind, OptimalJ is still the prototypical (and probably by now very mature) implementation of MDA - and that "real-world MDA" (rather than the admittedly very neat theoretical concept) I equate with heavy-duty code-generation, which I consider A Bad Thing. The alternative, which is to keep the amount of code to an absolute minimum by carefully organising/designing/architecting/hand-crafting it, just seems so much more intelligent.
Otherwise there is no real point to this post ;-)
cheers,
gerald
http://www.gerald-loeffler.net