<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>











<rss version="2.0" xmlns:jf="http://www.jivesoftware.com/xmlns/jiveforums/rss">



<channel>
    <title>Support Forums: Message List - Generic Entity Beans</title>
    <link>http://www.theserverside.com</link>
    <description>Most recent forum messages</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
        <generator>Jive Forums Silver 5.5.30 (www.jivesoftware.com)</generator>
    
    <pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 18:21:34 -0400</pubDate>


    <item>

        <title>EJB fordibs using Reflection API?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=15493</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Just read EJB Spec. It has been there since 1.1. The reason for banning reflection is also there.]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 04 Nov 2002 22:12:13 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 04 Nov 2002 22:12:13 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 04 Nov 2002 22:12:13 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Nov 4, 2002</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Jens Schumann</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>EJB fordibs using Reflection API?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=15493</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Hi Guys,...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 28 Oct 2002 03:46:25 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 28 Oct 2002 03:46:25 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 28 Oct 2002 03:46:25 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Oct 28, 2002</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Tobias Rademacher</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>EJB fordibs using Reflection API?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=15493</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[You are correct the wording there is left to some possible interpretation. I will post a question to EJB-INTEREST on this.]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Sat, 21 Sep 2002 10:45:28 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Sat, 21 Sep 2002 10:45:28 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Sat, 21 Sep 2002 10:45:28 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Sep 21, 2002</jf:date>
        <jf:author>traceroute</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>2</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>EJB fordibs using Reflection API?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=15493</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[My English is limited since it is not my mother tonque but I understand that part so that using Reflection API as such is not forbidden but using it to bypass Java language security rules is forbidden. Getter/setter methods are (or should be) public and...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 20 Sep 2002 04:28:48 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 20 Sep 2002 04:28:48 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 20 Sep 2002 04:28:48 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Sep 20, 2002</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Antti Valtokari</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>3</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Reflection performance problems</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=15493</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[The EJB spec forbids using reflection in EJBs (sec. 25.1.2)...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 19 Sep 2002 18:59:30 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 19 Sep 2002 18:59:30 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 19 Sep 2002 18:59:30 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Sep 19, 2002</jf:date>
        <jf:author>traceroute</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>4</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Reflection performance problems</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=15493</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Doesnt JBoss do something like this to dynamically generate stubs and ties for it beans?]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 19 Sep 2002 06:04:00 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 19 Sep 2002 06:04:00 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 19 Sep 2002 06:04:00 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Sep 19, 2002</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Web Master</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>5</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Reflection performance problems</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=15493</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[I have used similar approach for JavaBeans in the past. The performance for reflection-based solution was not that bad compared to the total round-trip time required to process an incoming HTTP-request. However the difference to compiled Java class doing...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 19 Sep 2002 00:27:45 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 19 Sep 2002 00:27:45 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 19 Sep 2002 00:27:45 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Sep 19, 2002</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Antti Valtokari</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>6</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Generic Entity Beans</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=15493</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[You are so right. That is why one use BMP with DAO and make use of the DAO for listing and the bean for updating. :)]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 17 Sep 2002 01:08:10 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 17 Sep 2002 01:08:10 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 17 Sep 2002 01:08:10 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Sep 17, 2002</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Pee Wee</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Generic Entity Beans</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=15493</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Well if you really cared about performance I don't think you'd be useing EJBs at all! But, that's another topic :) Given the huge overhead just to use EJBs (especially EJB 1.1) the overhead of reflection is fairly trivial....]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2002 18:18:54 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2002 18:18:54 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2002 18:18:54 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Sep 16, 2002</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Kent Smotherman</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Generic Entity Beans</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=15493</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[I think that the performance of reflection in Java must be improved. The version 1.4 improves it a little. The Pattern is valid. A pattern must not go to trash only by the fact that the actual programming languages don't perform well with it. The...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 13 Sep 2002 11:36:43 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 13 Sep 2002 11:36:43 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 13 Sep 2002 11:36:43 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Sep 13, 2002</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Marcio Antonio Alves</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Generic Entity Beans</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=15493</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[And just how often are performance not important...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 13 Sep 2002 02:33:59 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 13 Sep 2002 02:33:59 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 13 Sep 2002 02:33:59 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Sep 13, 2002</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Pee Wee</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Generic Entity Beans</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=15493</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[The problem of reflection is performance. But if performance isn't important then there is a strategy for Value Objects that enhance your pattern. The Value Object Factory Strategy uses reflection to create VO based on the class name. Then you only need...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 12 Sep 2002 17:57:10 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 12 Sep 2002 17:57:10 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 12 Sep 2002 17:57:10 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Sep 12, 2002</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Marcio Antonio Alves</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>11</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Generic Entity Beans</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=15493</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[The idea is to use a Generic Entity Value Object, that contains all logic to handle updates and concurrency for your entity beans....]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 12 Sep 2002 15:20:00 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 12 Sep 2002 15:20:00 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 12 Sep 2002 15:20:00 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Sep 12, 2002</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Edwin Mol</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>12</jf:replyCount>
    </item>



</channel>
</rss>

