<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>











<rss version="2.0" xmlns:jf="http://www.jivesoftware.com/xmlns/jiveforums/rss">



<channel>
    <title>Support Forums: Message List - XMOJO: Open Source JMX 1.0 Implementation</title>
    <link>http://www.theserverside.com</link>
    <description>Most recent forum messages</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
        <generator>Jive Forums Silver 5.5.30 (www.jivesoftware.com)</generator>
    
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 22:34:40 -0400</pubDate>


    <item>

        <title>It depends what you mean by &amp;quot;wide adoption&amp;quot;</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=20791</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[There are over 300 million Chinese-speaking internet users, which is close to the entire population of North America!<br><br>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="http://www.internetworldstats.com/" target="_blank">http://www.internetworldstats.com/</a>]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 09 May 2006 07:09:07 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 09 May 2006 07:09:07 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 09 May 2006 07:09:07 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>May 9, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Tom Sugden</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Another jmx 1.2  implementation</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=20791</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<div class="jive-quote">JFoxMX 1.2 implements the JMX 1.2 Specification, and is a sub-project of JFox, an open source (LGPL), application server from China, based on J2EE technology</div>...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2003 05:38:16 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2003 05:38:16 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2003 05:38:16 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Aug 9, 2003</jf:date>
        <jf:author>JD Evora</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>JMX 1.0, what about 1.2 + remoting?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=20791</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Remoting is the next project under XMOJO. (after JMX 1.2 support)]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2003 14:11:11 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2003 14:11:11 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2003 14:11:11 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Aug 8, 2003</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Alex D Paul</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>What's the point?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=20791</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[The XMOJO implementation based on JMX 1.2 is close to completion-to be rolled out soon.]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2003 14:05:17 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2003 14:05:17 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2003 14:05:17 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Aug 8, 2003</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Alex D Paul</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Another jmx 1.2  implementation</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=20791</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[JFoxMX 1.2 implements the JMX 1.2 Specification, and is a sub-project of JFox, an open source (LGPL), application server from China, based on J2EE technology...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2003 01:08:38 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2003 01:08:38 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2003 01:08:38 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Aug 8, 2003</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Peter Cheng</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>2</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Open source, JMX</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=20791</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[See also:...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2003 19:44:02 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2003 19:44:02 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2003 19:44:02 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Aug 7, 2003</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Sean Sullivan</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>What's the point?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=20791</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Perhaps I've missed the point, but what _is_ the point of releasing a JMX impl that is 1.0 when JMX 1.2 is out? Sure it's open source, but so is Mx4J, and its JMX 1.1 compliant working towards 1.2. Sounds like a marketing gimmick to me :) However, it has...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2003 18:40:46 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2003 18:40:46 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2003 18:40:46 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Aug 7, 2003</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Pratik Patel</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>MX4J</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=20791</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[MX4J implements JMX1.1 and the team are working on JMX1.2 and Remoting.
<br>
<br>Alireza]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2003 17:25:28 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2003 17:25:28 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2003 17:25:28 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Aug 7, 2003</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Ali Reza Taherkordy</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>JMX 1.0, what about 1.2 + remoting?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=20791</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Nice, does anyone know if there are plans to support JMX 1.2 + remoting.]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2003 15:20:16 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2003 15:20:16 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2003 15:20:16 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Aug 7, 2003</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Torben Norling</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>How does it compare to MX4J ?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=20791</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[How does it compare to MX4J (<a class="jive-link-external" href="http://mx4j.sf.net" target="_newWindow">http://mx4j.sf.net</a>) ? 
<br>MX4J is currently used in Tomcat 4.1.X.]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2003 12:49:41 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2003 12:49:41 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2003 12:49:41 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Aug 7, 2003</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Franck Arnulfo</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Good Implementation of JMX for us!</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=20791</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Good Implementation of JMX for us, so we can build more manageable component and system based on it.
<br>
<br>John Lee]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2003 11:50:45 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2003 11:50:45 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2003 11:50:45 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Aug 7, 2003</jf:date>
        <jf:author>John Lee</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>XMOJO: Open Source JMX 1.0 Implementation</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=20791</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[XMOJO is a free open source implementation of JMX 1.0 specification. This implementation is derived from AdventNet's JMX implementation( available in the industry since 1999). Apart from complete implementation of JMX specification, XMOJO also contains...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2003 01:48:10 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2003 01:48:10 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2003 01:48:10 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Aug 7, 2003</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Alex D Paul</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>11</jf:replyCount>
    </item>



</channel>
</rss>

