<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>











<rss version="2.0" xmlns:jf="http://www.jivesoftware.com/xmlns/jiveforums/rss">



<channel>
    <title>Support Forums: Message List - Interview: The Next Move in Programming</title>
    <link>http://www.theserverside.com</link>
    <description>Most recent forum messages</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
        <generator>Jive Forums Silver 5.5.30 (www.jivesoftware.com)</generator>
    
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 13:32:15 -0400</pubDate>


    <item>

        <title>New languages</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=23962</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[IBM looked at this before - the VisualAge family of languages was to write to a common virtual machine - languages included Smalltalk, C++, Java (and I think COBOL!). As far as I know this did eventually work but when the VisualAge product line...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2004 10:12:41 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2004 10:12:41 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2004 10:12:41 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Feb 18, 2004</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Ken Hall</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Process-specific constructs</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=23962</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[That's strange, I blogged on Saturday, exactly the same subject matter:...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2004 16:16:35 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2004 16:16:35 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2004 16:16:35 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Feb 17, 2004</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Carlos Perez</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>New languages</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=23962</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Personally I think that a partial solution might look something like the .NET, where you should be able to use many languages in the same projects easily. Of course this is does not help if the languages all look the same (like C++/C#/VB/Java). What I'm...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2004 15:28:00 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2004 15:28:00 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2004 15:28:00 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Feb 17, 2004</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Juha Palomaki</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Interview: The Next Move in Programming</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=23962</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[I think Victoria's interview is interesting and that the issues that she addresses are the ones that are most important in defining the future direction in software. I have a few comments -...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2004 09:08:28 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2004 09:08:28 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2004 09:08:28 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Feb 17, 2004</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Ken Hall</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>2</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Process-specific constructs</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=23962</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Uhh... I think she's misunderstood object-orientation. I don't mean that OO is perfect or doesn't need &quot;fixing&quot; (I am after all part of the AOP movement) but saying that there is no way of modelling &quot;casuality&quot;, dynamics or...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2004 05:01:46 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2004 05:01:46 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2004 05:01:46 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Feb 17, 2004</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Jon Tirsen</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Good, bad, and ugly</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=23962</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[I do agree that both state and sequence are totally lost on an object oriented system. However I don't think OO is the problem per se. I think that OO hasn't progressed in a considerable time....]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2004 16:53:25 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2004 16:53:25 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2004 16:53:25 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Feb 16, 2004</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Leif Ashley</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Process-specific constructs</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=23962</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Very good article. I fear SUN would end up like Xerox PARC in creating exciting new technologies and some body else benefit from it.. 
<br>
<br>Krishna]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2004 11:45:39 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2004 11:45:39 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2004 11:45:39 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Feb 16, 2004</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Krishna Moorthy</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>clean-slate</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=23962</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[&quot;The work so far has been promising.&quot; That certainly makes me curious: are these things being implemented? I'd surely want to see some early examples...!!...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2004 03:10:39 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2004 03:10:39 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2004 03:10:39 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Feb 16, 2004</jf:date>
        <jf:author>joost de vries</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>The Next Move in Programming</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=23962</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Very nice interview, thanks....]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2004 02:39:52 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2004 02:39:52 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2004 02:39:52 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Feb 16, 2004</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Lofi Dewanto</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Process-specific constructs</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=23962</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[I found this article surprisingly good. It is comforting to know that Sun still has bright software people that can think above &quot;Middleware is dead&quot; level of complexity. ...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2004 02:27:54 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2004 02:27:54 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2004 02:27:54 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Feb 16, 2004</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Nikita Ivanov</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Process-specific constructs</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=23962</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[From the article: ...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Sun, 15 Feb 2004 22:32:27 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Sun, 15 Feb 2004 22:32:27 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Sun, 15 Feb 2004 22:32:27 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Feb 15, 2004</jf:date>
        <jf:author>COBBIE BEHREND</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>5</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Interview: The Next Move in Programming</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=23962</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Sun has an interview of Victoria Livschitz a senior IT architect and Java Evangelist. In the interview Victoria discusses her opinions on the state of programming with respect to software complexity and how we deal with it. She has a lot of interesting...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Sun, 15 Feb 2004 21:41:29 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Sun, 15 Feb 2004 21:41:29 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Sun, 15 Feb 2004 21:41:29 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Feb 15, 2004</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Dion Almaer</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>11</jf:replyCount>
    </item>



</channel>
</rss>

