<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>











<rss version="2.0" xmlns:jf="http://www.jivesoftware.com/xmlns/jiveforums/rss">



<channel>
    <title>Support Forums: Message List - Active XML Components</title>
    <link>http://www.theserverside.com</link>
    <description>Most recent forum messages</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
        <generator>Jive Forums Silver 5.5.30 (www.jivesoftware.com)</generator>
    
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 23:13:42 -0400</pubDate>


    <item>

        <title>RDF/OWL</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=25629</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[I think that the suggestion for RDF/OWL was for the syntax of your markup. The way the XML tags are defined and authored.<br><br>For example:<br><br>&lt;jdbc-statement datasource-id=&quot;someDB&quot;&gt;<br><br>would be<br><br>&lt;jdbc-statement...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jun 2004 17:33:46 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 11 Jun 2004 17:33:46 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 11 Jun 2004 17:33:46 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jun 11, 2004</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Tony Sintes</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>RDF for greater eloquence and consistency</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=25629</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[I think you are judging this incorrectly and this is solely my fault, as I have not given you or anybody in this matter more information and examples along with business cases to show the real flexibility of the framework.<br>One thing you say it does...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 12 May 2004 22:58:27 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 12 May 2004 22:58:27 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 12 May 2004 22:58:27 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>May 12, 2004</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Artem Yegorov</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>RDF for greater eloquence and consistency</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=25629</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[I think that the intention of the framework heads in the right direction but that you should be looking at RDF and OWL for creating a comprehensive implementation meta language.  If a larger more structured vocabulary isn't adopted then you'll be bolting...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2004 07:55:30 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 11 May 2004 07:55:30 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 11 May 2004 07:55:30 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>May 11, 2004</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Douglas Tillman</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>2</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Active XML Components</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=25629</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[I have been working on a framework that would be able to automatically doscover and integrate other framework and APIs via provided metadata and provide access to such via a common XML-based language. I have ventured as far a being able to integrate core...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 29 Apr 2004 16:06:44 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 29 Apr 2004 16:06:44 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 29 Apr 2004 16:06:44 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Apr 29, 2004</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Artem Yegorov</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>3</jf:replyCount>
    </item>



</channel>
</rss>

