<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>











<rss version="2.0" xmlns:jf="http://www.jivesoftware.com/xmlns/jiveforums/rss">



<channel>
    <title>Support Forums: Message List - TMC Introduces SOA Blueprints; Public Review Open</title>
    <link>http://www.theserverside.com</link>
    <description>Most recent forum messages</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
        <generator>Jive Forums Silver 5.5.30 (www.jivesoftware.com)</generator>
    
    <pubDate>Sun, 26 May 2013 04:42:34 -0400</pubDate>


    <item>

        <title>re: You can't define blueprints if you don't know the definition</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=25976</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[I think key point here should be the term 'business', i.e. business service. I would define 'SOA service' as a Business Domain level Service. Business domain is a specific business area of interest (subject matter) from the point of view of a business,...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2004 12:48:59 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2004 12:48:59 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2004 12:48:59 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jun 25, 2004</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Branko Koprivica</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Granularity Process</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=25976</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[In addition to Matthias' questions, which I share, I have some questions around the granularity.  I really like that you call out the different levels of granuality between services and components.  That alone separates you from other vendors that are...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2004 17:22:07 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2004 17:22:07 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2004 17:22:07 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jun 18, 2004</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Matt Segvich</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>re: You can't define blueprints if you don't know the definition</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=25976</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Well, you can have your view and I'll have mine. I believe this effort will serve to unify vendors and drive towards a common baseline SOA specification. Time will tell who is correct.]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 07 Jun 2004 10:42:02 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 07 Jun 2004 10:42:02 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 07 Jun 2004 10:42:02 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jun 7, 2004</jf:date>
        <jf:author>traceroute</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>re: You can't define blueprints if you don't know the definition</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=25976</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Let me get this straight, you are gathering use cases from projects that have proclaimed themselves as conforming to SOA?<br><br>In otherwords, your methodology seems to be, find all projects that use the term SOA, collect their patterns and then...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 07 Jun 2004 10:26:39 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 07 Jun 2004 10:26:39 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 07 Jun 2004 10:26:39 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jun 7, 2004</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Carlos Perez</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>2</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>re: You can't define blueprints if you don't know the definition</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=25976</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Hi (Dave or John?),</blockquote>Sorry, my ISP was out and I was using a friend's machine.<blockquote>Did you just implicitly agree that there are no decent definitions of SOA?</blockquote>I don't know if I'd agree that there are no...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 07 Jun 2004 09:43:38 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 07 Jun 2004 09:43:38 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 07 Jun 2004 09:43:38 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jun 7, 2004</jf:date>
        <jf:author>traceroute</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>3</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>You can't define blueprints if you don't know the definition</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=25976</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Hi (Dave or John?),<br><br>Did you just implicitly agree that there are no decent definitions of SOA?<br><br>You seem to imply that gathering a set of use cases of &quot;SOA&quot; helps you build a &quot;SOA&quot; based application.  Well unfortunately,...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 07 Jun 2004 07:31:33 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 07 Jun 2004 07:31:33 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 07 Jun 2004 07:31:33 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jun 7, 2004</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Carlos Perez</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>4</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Topics and queues: in what sense?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=25976</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>This is a good point. Would you suggest possibly replacing &quot;TOPIC&quot; with &quot;async pub/sub mechanism&quot; and &quot;QUEUE&quot; with &quot;async point-to-point mechanism&quot;?</blockquote>This would be a nice syntactic move, but...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 07 Jun 2004 06:25:04 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 07 Jun 2004 06:25:04 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 07 Jun 2004 06:25:04 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jun 7, 2004</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Jacques Talbot</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>You can't define blueprints if you don't know the definition</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=25976</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Hi Carlos,<br>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<br>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;I agree with many of your comments however I think this approach makes sense. Typically one will come up with use cases prior to designing a system and that's...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jun 2004 12:04:24 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 04 Jun 2004 12:04:24 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 04 Jun 2004 12:04:24 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jun 4, 2004</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Dave Ehrington</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>5</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>You can't define blueprints if you don't know the definition</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=25976</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[I'm sorry but I've got to shoot this paper down.<br><br>You can't claim to know how to put together a set of blueprints for SOA if you don't even know what SOA means!<br><br>SOA = Service Oriented Architecture not Same Old Architecture which incidentally...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jun 2004 07:00:33 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 04 Jun 2004 07:00:33 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 04 Jun 2004 07:00:33 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jun 4, 2004</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Carlos Perez</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>6</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Topics and queues: in what sense?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=25976</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[This is a good point. Would you suggest possibly replacing &quot;TOPIC&quot; with &quot;async pub/sub mechanism&quot; and &quot;QUEUE&quot; with &quot;async point-to-point mechanism&quot;?]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jun 2004 19:31:16 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 03 Jun 2004 19:31:16 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 03 Jun 2004 19:31:16 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jun 3, 2004</jf:date>
        <jf:author>traceroute</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Topics and queues: in what sense?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=25976</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Even if SOA /= WS, I assume this can be implemented with the current WS stack.<br><br>You use the notions of TOPIC or QUEUE or ... to describe processes interacting. However, there is no such thing defined in the current WS-* specs.<br><br>So what is the...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jun 2004 12:12:51 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 03 Jun 2004 12:12:51 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 03 Jun 2004 12:12:51 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jun 3, 2004</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Jacques Talbot</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>2</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Jini is cross platform because Java is!</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=25976</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote><blockquote>This is a pretty amazing comment.  I think it really indicates how much of Jini and Java some people are really missing.  Java and Jini are in fact targeted at creating the ability to work across mulitple OS...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 02 Jun 2004 01:39:55 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 02 Jun 2004 01:39:55 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 02 Jun 2004 01:39:55 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jun 2, 2004</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Gregg Wonderly</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Where's the best practice?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=25976</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Denis,<br><br>Thanks for your comments. One of the major things we are trying to achieve with this exercise is bound within the issues you are raising. There are currently no best-practices for SOA. There needs to be something understandable and...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2004 02:54:34 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 25 May 2004 02:54:34 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 25 May 2004 02:54:34 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>May 25, 2004</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Steve Wilkes</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>usage of term &amp;quot;component&amp;quot;, section 3.3.2 ?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=25976</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[I'm fine with having components defined as fine-granular &quot;things&quot;, used by <br>Business Services and Workflow Services (Figure 3).<br><br>Now, I'd like to further qualify the term &quot;Services&quot; in &quot;Component Services&quot;,<br>as...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2004 02:38:04 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 25 May 2004 02:38:04 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 25 May 2004 02:38:04 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>May 25, 2004</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Matthias Weidmann</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Where's the best practice?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=25976</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[I downloaded and read this expecting to learn things about best practice SOA. Foolish me. <br><br>I downloaded and read this expecting to learn how all the parts of an SOA interacted, much like the j2ee blueprints showed off how the platform...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2004 02:29:34 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 25 May 2004 02:29:34 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 25 May 2004 02:29:34 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>May 25, 2004</jf:date>
        <jf:author>denis krizanovic</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>



</channel>
</rss>

