Support Forums: Message List - Spring/Hibernate vs. J2EE container and EJB

You can use terracota

Tue, 14 Sep 2010 03:36:35 -0400

Terracota can help very easily without any change in code to achieve high availability

...

spring/hibernate can be clustered

Thu, 05 Aug 2004 15:08:59 -0400

Ok Adam but doing this with tomcat is not a standard and you stay
dependent of that application server. With EJBs you can do that
in a vendor-independence way, right? ;)

spring/hibernate can be clustered

Wed, 04 Aug 2004 08:39:21 -0400

Before accepting the rhetoric on Spring/Hibernate vs. EJB, I would attempt too look at what you are trying to do. If you are going to build a site that will require 24x7 uptime, take a very high hit load and transaction rate, I would take a...

Spring/Hibernate vs. J2EE container and EJB

Sat, 31 Jul 2004 11:17:17 -0400

Before accepting the rhetoric on Spring/Hibernate vs. EJB, I would attempt too look at what you are trying to do. If you are going to build a site that will require 24x7 uptime, take a very high hit load and transaction rate, I would take a second look...

Good book...

Thu, 29 Jul 2004 15:05:40 -0400

Better, Faster, Lighter Java
By Bruce A. Tate, Justin Gehtland

Spring/Hibernate vs. J2EE container and EJB

Thu, 29 Jul 2004 13:28:09 -0400

There is a lot of talk right now about using solutions like Spring/Hibernate rather than deploying on a J2EE server and using Session/Entity beans. While I understand the arguments against EJB (especially) and _for_ Spring/Hibernate, I'm wondering what...