<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>











<rss version="2.0" xmlns:jf="http://www.jivesoftware.com/xmlns/jiveforums/rss">



<channel>
    <title>Support Forums: Message List - Aspect-Oriented Annotations and JBoss AOP RC1</title>
    <link>http://www.theserverside.com</link>
    <description>Most recent forum messages</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
        <generator>Jive Forums Silver 5.5.30 (www.jivesoftware.com)</generator>
    
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 22:16:04 -0400</pubDate>


    <item>

        <title>Simplicity and transparency of proxy based solution</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=28323</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Of course. What I was saying is that we should not irrationally attempt to suppress a perfectly valid technical approach such as bytecode manipulation.</blockquote>Sorry about that, Cam. My comment was meant for the rest of the thread, not...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2004 13:40:53 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2004 13:40:53 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2004 13:40:53 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Sep 1, 2004</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Bob Lee</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Simplicity and transparency of proxy based solution</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=28323</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>This argument makes little sense. Bytecode injection and proxying are not mutually exclusive.</blockquote>Of course. What I was saying is that we should not irrationally attempt to suppress a perfectly valid technical approach such as...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2004 11:15:44 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2004 11:15:44 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2004 11:15:44 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Sep 1, 2004</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Cameron Purdy</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Simplicity and transparency of proxy based solution</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=28323</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[This argument makes little sense. Bytecode injection and proxying are not mutually exclusive. It's like arguing whether inheritance or composition is better--it depends on the situation. Ideally AspectJ would support proxying as a third type of weaving...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2004 10:50:19 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2004 10:50:19 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2004 10:50:19 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Sep 1, 2004</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Bob Lee</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>2</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Simplicity and transparency of proxy based solution</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=28323</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>It was probably noticed that I am not a big fan of Spring, but here Rod is technically correct: in the current state of affair proxy based solutions are 'safer' and really cover many useful scenarios ( see Rickard's port).<br>Why safer?...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2004 07:55:20 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2004 07:55:20 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2004 07:55:20 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Aug 31, 2004</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Cameron Purdy</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>3</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>weaving vs. proxies</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=28323</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote><blockquote>Sounds very inefficient and unscalable to me.Bill</blockquote>It's been working quite well the past years we've been using it, but in our case we were more concerned with getting the right results and semantics rather than the...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2004 08:31:56 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2004 08:31:56 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2004 08:31:56 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Aug 30, 2004</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Rickard Oberg</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Changed POJO vs Unchainged POJO</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=28323</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Performance is tunable thing, I do not think new language features are usefull, but standard API for this stuff (advanced reflection) is, It can be implemented in many ways and many ways can be implemented on top of it (&quot;static&quot; or...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2004 08:06:22 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2004 08:06:22 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2004 08:06:22 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Aug 30, 2004</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Juozas Baliuka</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Simplicity and transparency of proxy based solution</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=28323</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[This could be a useful capability, but it does have the downside that interception will be class loader wide. It's useful to have the capability for per-proxy advice, so that instances of the same class can be advised differently in different contexts....]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2004 07:55:14 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2004 07:55:14 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2004 07:55:14 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Aug 30, 2004</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Rod Johnson</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Changed POJO vs Unchainged POJO</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=28323</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>BTW, it can be very trivial to implement this stuff in language or in standard API level :<br><br><br>MyClass.class.addMethodInterceptor(...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2004 07:07:33 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2004 07:07:33 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2004 07:07:33 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Aug 30, 2004</jf:date>
        <jf:author>vicky kak</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Changed POJO vs Unchainged POJO</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=28323</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote><a href="http://computing-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/FUD" target="_blank">http://computing-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/FUD</a>&quot;FUD wars - /fuhd worz/ Political posturing, intended to create FUD, engaged in by hardware and...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2004 07:04:38 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2004 07:04:38 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2004 07:04:38 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Aug 30, 2004</jf:date>
        <jf:author>vicky kak</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>weaving vs. proxies</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=28323</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Transparency, transparency, transparency.</blockquote>Just wondering, have you tried using Pico or Spring?<blockquote>Of course you do.  If your object has business methods that change the internal state of the object.  With JBossCache,...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2004 02:13:51 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2004 02:13:51 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2004 02:13:51 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Aug 30, 2004</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Rickard Oberg</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>weaving vs. proxies</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=28323</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Why is it better to do this using AOP rather than something like Pico or Spring?</blockquote>Transparency, transparency, transparency.<blockquote><blockquote>  - transparent transactional state (JBossCache)</blockquote></blockquote>Of course...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Sun, 29 Aug 2004 17:17:16 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Sun, 29 Aug 2004 17:17:16 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Sun, 29 Aug 2004 17:17:16 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Aug 29, 2004</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Bill Burke</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>2</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Simplicity and transparency of proxy based solution</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=28323</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[BTW, it can be very trivial to implement this stuff in language or in standard API level :<br><br><br>MyClass.class.addMethodInterceptor(...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Sun, 29 Aug 2004 13:45:47 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Sun, 29 Aug 2004 13:45:47 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Sun, 29 Aug 2004 13:45:47 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Aug 29, 2004</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Juozas Baliuka</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>2</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Simplicity and transparency of proxy based solution</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=28323</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<a href="http://computing-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/FUD" target="_blank">http://computing-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/FUD</a><br><br>&quot;FUD wars - /fuhd worz/ Political posturing, intended to create FUD, engaged in by hardware and software...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Sun, 29 Aug 2004 13:15:41 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Sun, 29 Aug 2004 13:15:41 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Sun, 29 Aug 2004 13:15:41 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Aug 29, 2004</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Juozas Baliuka</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>5</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Simplicity and transparency of proxy based solution</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=28323</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Rod, please stop the FUD on bytecode weaving to promote your own commercial product.</blockquote>Uuu, how harsh. Just because SPREADING FUD is your style of doing business and promoting JBOSS (fake posts, remember you...) it doesn't mean that...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Sun, 29 Aug 2004 10:38:57 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Sun, 29 Aug 2004 10:38:57 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Sun, 29 Aug 2004 10:38:57 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Aug 29, 2004</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Dorel Vaida</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>6</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>weaving vs. proxies</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=28323</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[stat monitoring or debug is a good use case for this stuff.<br><a href="http://profiler.netbeans.org/index.html" target="_blank">http://profiler.netbeans.org/index.html</a>]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Sat, 28 Aug 2004 17:28:33 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Sat, 28 Aug 2004 17:28:33 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Sat, 28 Aug 2004 17:28:33 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Aug 28, 2004</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Juozas Baliuka</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>



</channel>
</rss>

