<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>











<rss version="2.0" xmlns:jf="http://www.jivesoftware.com/xmlns/jiveforums/rss">



<channel>
    <title>Support Forums: Message List - Opinion: A Simple Solution for the Patent Mess</title>
    <link>http://www.theserverside.com</link>
    <description>Most recent forum messages</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
        <generator>Jive Forums Silver 5.5.30 (www.jivesoftware.com)</generator>
    
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 17:40:34 -0400</pubDate>


    <item>

        <title>Software is special</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=29554</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Software is special because it is infinitely composable.  Perhaps more so than in any other field, today's inventions in software become the building blocks of tomorrow's inventions. </blockquote>Software is not special, the same is true for...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 26 Oct 2004 12:20:49 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 26 Oct 2004 12:20:49 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 26 Oct 2004 12:20:49 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Oct 26, 2004</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Konstantin Ignatyev</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Software is special</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=29554</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Software is special because it is infinitely composable.  Perhaps more so than in any other field, today's inventions in software become the building blocks of tomorrow's inventions. <br><br>The US Constitution makes clear that the purpose of patent and...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 26 Oct 2004 07:23:02 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 26 Oct 2004 07:23:02 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 26 Oct 2004 07:23:02 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Oct 26, 2004</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Bill Schneider</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Opinion: A Simple Solution for the Patent Mess</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=29554</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>.....<br><br>There is only one solution to fix the software patent problem: drop it.</blockquote><br>I think that we may have found a solution.]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 25 Oct 2004 15:47:41 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 25 Oct 2004 15:47:41 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 25 Oct 2004 15:47:41 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Oct 25, 2004</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Joe Java</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Opinion: A Simple Solution for the Patent Mess</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=29554</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Your suggestion for limiting the timeframe for a software patent is definitly good: 20 years is ridiculous. Limiting the damages in court is also good: today it costs on avg $2M to defend yourself in a US court for a patent violation. As for european IP...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 25 Oct 2004 13:51:54 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 25 Oct 2004 13:51:54 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 25 Oct 2004 13:51:54 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Oct 25, 2004</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Philippe Grenet</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>How about limits on number of patents that an entity can hold</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=29554</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[In addition to some of the good ideas mentioned in the parent posts, how about adding the idea of a limit on the number of patents that a single entity can hold at one time. The limit to be determined through appropriate analysis.<br><br>This would help...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 25 Oct 2004 13:48:40 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 25 Oct 2004 13:48:40 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 25 Oct 2004 13:48:40 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Oct 25, 2004</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Joe Java</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Good book to read about patents</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=29554</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[You should read &quot;Free Culture&quot; by LAWRENCE LESSIG.<br>Can be found <a href="http://free-culture.org/get-it/" target="_blank">here</a>.<br>It makes an interesting read, and the mess clears up a bit (you understand that you can't compete with the...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 25 Oct 2004 11:30:12 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 25 Oct 2004 11:30:12 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 25 Oct 2004 11:30:12 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Oct 25, 2004</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Edward Moraru</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Let the patent process work against itself</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=29554</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[I think the solution to the patent process lies in turning it against itself in the following way:<br><br>1) If I apply for a patent then I get it almost immediately.<br><br>2) If someone already had the patent, I get fined some amount, and the money...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 25 Oct 2004 08:37:50 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 25 Oct 2004 08:37:50 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 25 Oct 2004 08:37:50 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Oct 25, 2004</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Stacy Curl</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Opinion: A Simple Solution for the Patent Mess</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=29554</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>5.	There is no simple algorithm to determine inventiveness and obviousness. Any invention will become obvious and trivial to someone once revealed. (The Theory of General Relativity could become trivial to one in the field of physics after...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 25 Oct 2004 06:59:20 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 25 Oct 2004 06:59:20 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 25 Oct 2004 06:59:20 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Oct 25, 2004</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Klas Skogmar</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>2</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>No Software Patents!</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=29554</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[An european point of view I agree with:<br><br><a href="http://www.nosoftwarepatents.com/en/m/intro/index.html" target="_blank">http://www.nosoftwarepatents.com/en/m/intro/index.html</a>]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 25 Oct 2004 05:42:51 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 25 Oct 2004 05:42:51 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 25 Oct 2004 05:42:51 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Oct 25, 2004</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Volker Bohmer</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Back to first principles</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=29554</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>The patent system largely works for engineering inventions.  So this discussion is limited to software, not the patent system in general.  First of all, does the patent system differentiate between technical fields when granting patents?...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Sun, 24 Oct 2004 23:23:26 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Sun, 24 Oct 2004 23:23:26 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Sun, 24 Oct 2004 23:23:26 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Oct 24, 2004</jf:date>
        <jf:author>hacking bear</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Opinion: A Simple Solution for the Patent Mess</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=29554</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote><blockquote>4. Truly useful inventions deserve more protection.</blockquote>Why? And how is &quot;usefulness&quot; measured? Impossible, of course.</blockquote><br>&quot;by the market&quot;<br><blockquote><blockquote>The government can...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Sun, 24 Oct 2004 23:16:33 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Sun, 24 Oct 2004 23:16:33 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Sun, 24 Oct 2004 23:16:33 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Oct 24, 2004</jf:date>
        <jf:author>hacking bear</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>What about marketing skills?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=29554</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[You are right about the marketing skill concern. That's why I tried to emphasize the importance on designing the fee schedule. There could be other measures to give individual or small business more time leverage. But if the inventor cannot successfully...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Sun, 24 Oct 2004 23:09:17 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Sun, 24 Oct 2004 23:09:17 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Sun, 24 Oct 2004 23:09:17 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Oct 24, 2004</jf:date>
        <jf:author>hacking bear</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>TSS needs a reader protection algorithm!!</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=29554</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[If you can invent an algorithm to filter them, you will make huge amount of money. ;-)]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Sun, 24 Oct 2004 23:00:13 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Sun, 24 Oct 2004 23:00:13 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Sun, 24 Oct 2004 23:00:13 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Oct 24, 2004</jf:date>
        <jf:author>hacking bear</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>TSS needs a reader protection algorithm!!</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=29554</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[To save readers from stupidity like this ...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Sun, 24 Oct 2004 20:16:16 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Sun, 24 Oct 2004 20:16:16 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Sun, 24 Oct 2004 20:16:16 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Oct 24, 2004</jf:date>
        <jf:author>tom tarb</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Back to first principles</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=29554</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[The patent system largely works for engineering inventions.  So this discussion is limited to software, not the patent system in general.  First of all, does the patent system differentiate between technical fields when granting patents?  If not, that's...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Sun, 24 Oct 2004 06:45:21 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Sun, 24 Oct 2004 06:45:21 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Sun, 24 Oct 2004 06:45:21 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Oct 24, 2004</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Michael Ansley</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>



</channel>
</rss>

