Support Forums: Message List - TSS Java Symposium 18 session reports & survey questions posted http://www.theserverside.com Most recent forum messages en Jive Forums Silver 5.5.30 (www.jivesoftware.com) Sun, 19 May 2013 21:36:48 -0400 EJB3 Backward compatility http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=32757 To me I don't see why the don't expand the certification model and make everyone happy. From what I see most people want to have options here so why not have a EJB 3.0 only certification for containers that don't want to support the bagage...]]> Fri, 25 Mar 2005 07:09:36 -0500 Fri, 25 Mar 2005 07:09:36 -0500 Fri, 25 Mar 2005 07:09:36 -0500 Mar 25, 2005 Rasmus Lund 0 The real issue http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=32757 Wed, 23 Mar 2005 11:53:51 -0500 Wed, 23 Mar 2005 11:53:51 -0500 Wed, 23 Mar 2005 11:53:51 -0500 Mar 23, 2005 Randy Schnier 0 The real issue http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=32757 Oh come on Hani. This is disingenuous and intellectually bankrupt and you know it.
Oh come on, that'd be like me saying that you're only bitter about EJBs and J2EE because you get hired for that stuff (sure, you spend all your...]]> Tue, 22 Mar 2005 16:53:59 -0500 Tue, 22 Mar 2005 16:53:59 -0500 Tue, 22 Mar 2005 16:53:59 -0500 Mar 22, 2005 Hani Suleiman 0 EJB3 Backward compatility http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=32757 There isn't a law saying you can't make a EJB3 only container. Just don't expect to have it certified. If someone makes one that is better than others, it will succeed, regardless of the "Lords On High".
What is an...]]> Tue, 22 Mar 2005 14:21:46 -0500 Tue, 22 Mar 2005 14:21:46 -0500 Tue, 22 Mar 2005 14:21:46 -0500 Mar 22, 2005 Vincent Frisina 0 The real issue http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=32757
The problem is that I think people are forgetting how specifications work, and what the actual advantages of a specifications are over some random open...]]> Tue, 22 Mar 2005 13:31:30 -0500 Tue, 22 Mar 2005 13:31:30 -0500 Tue, 22 Mar 2005 13:31:30 -0500 Mar 22, 2005 Jason Carreira 1 EJB3 Backward compatility http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=32757 Tue, 22 Mar 2005 13:02:18 -0500 Tue, 22 Mar 2005 13:02:18 -0500 Tue, 22 Mar 2005 13:02:18 -0500 Mar 22, 2005 David Jones 1 The real issue http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=32757
A specification is a contract. For some customers, one of the biggest selling...]]> Tue, 22 Mar 2005 12:54:00 -0500 Tue, 22 Mar 2005 12:54:00 -0500 Tue, 22 Mar 2005 12:54:00 -0500 Mar 22, 2005 Hani Suleiman 3 EJB3 Backward compatility http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=32757 There isn't a law saying you can't make a EJB3 only container. Just don't expect to have it certified. If someone makes one that is better than others, it will succeed, regardless of the "Lords On High".
]]> Tue, 22 Mar 2005 11:23:47 -0500 Tue, 22 Mar 2005 11:23:47 -0500 Tue, 22 Mar 2005 11:23:47 -0500 Mar 22, 2005 Vincent Frisina 0 EJB3 Backward compatility http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=32757 Does backward compatibility matter to you with EJB3? Speak up! Backward Compatibility with EJB 2.x, who cares? regardsDebu Panda
No, because...]]> Tue, 22 Mar 2005 11:04:03 -0500 Tue, 22 Mar 2005 11:04:03 -0500 Tue, 22 Mar 2005 11:04:03 -0500 Mar 22, 2005 sadfasdf asdadsf 0 EJB3 Backward compatility http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=32757 And the Spec Committee has overwhelmingly said no.
The poll at TSS was actually the first time that a popular result showed so many people in favour of doing this. The Spec Committee has discussed this at length and has been...]]> Tue, 22 Mar 2005 10:38:31 -0500 Tue, 22 Mar 2005 10:38:31 -0500 Tue, 22 Mar 2005 10:38:31 -0500 Mar 22, 2005 Mike Keith 4 EJB3 Backward compatility http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=32757
Does backward compatibility matter to you with EJB3? Speak up!
Obviously backward compatibility is going to be important to some customers, and will be supported by the existing vendors. That's not the issue.The...]]> Tue, 22 Mar 2005 09:46:34 -0500 Tue, 22 Mar 2005 09:46:34 -0500 Tue, 22 Mar 2005 09:46:34 -0500 Mar 22, 2005 Bill Burke 0 EJB3 Backward compatility http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=32757 Tue, 22 Mar 2005 09:46:26 -0500 Tue, 22 Mar 2005 09:46:26 -0500 Tue, 22 Mar 2005 09:46:26 -0500 Mar 22, 2005 John Murray 4 EJB3 Backward compatility http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=32757
Does backward compatibility matter to you with EJB3? Speak up!
Obviously backward compatibility is going to be important to some customers, and will be supported by the existing vendors. That's not the issue.The...]]> Tue, 22 Mar 2005 09:40:20 -0500 Tue, 22 Mar 2005 09:40:20 -0500 Tue, 22 Mar 2005 09:40:20 -0500 Mar 22, 2005 Jason Carreira 10 EJB3 Backward compatility http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=32757 Does backward compatibility matter to you with EJB3? Speak up!
Obviously backward compatibility is going to be important to some customers, and will be supported by the existing vendors. That's not the issue.

The...]]> Tue, 22 Mar 2005 09:35:05 -0500 Tue, 22 Mar 2005 09:35:05 -0500 Tue, 22 Mar 2005 09:35:05 -0500 Mar 22, 2005 Corby Page 12 EJB3 Backward compatility http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=32757
Backward Compatibility with EJB 2.x, who cares?

regards
Debu Panda]]> Tue, 22 Mar 2005 08:05:52 -0500 Tue, 22 Mar 2005 08:05:52 -0500 Tue, 22 Mar 2005 08:05:52 -0500 Mar 22, 2005 Debu Panda 14