Support Forums: Message List - Applying JRL: A developer fixes the JDK http://www.theserverside.com Most recent forum messages en Jive Forums Silver 5.5.30 (www.jivesoftware.com) Wed, 19 Jun 2013 09:36:20 -0400 Delusional Dogma of Open Source http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=33424 Fri, 22 Apr 2005 09:06:20 -0400 Fri, 22 Apr 2005 09:06:20 -0400 Fri, 22 Apr 2005 09:06:20 -0400 Apr 22, 2005 sam provencher 0 Applying JRL: A developer fixes the JDK http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=33424 But, from another point of view, maybe a truly open community could give more flexibility to the java platform.
I lost my confidence in open communities after 2 best Linux distros (RedHat and Suse) are not for FREE anymore ...]]> Thu, 21 Apr 2005 18:01:56 -0400 Thu, 21 Apr 2005 18:01:56 -0400 Thu, 21 Apr 2005 18:01:56 -0400 Apr 21, 2005 damian frach 0 Good News http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=33424
Work for whom? "Collaborative source" for instance seems to work more for the software company than for the collaborators...
Won't you (me, everyone) benefit from Andi's patches?
Sorry, let me...]]> Thu, 21 Apr 2005 12:00:40 -0400 Thu, 21 Apr 2005 12:00:40 -0400 Thu, 21 Apr 2005 12:00:40 -0400 Apr 21, 2005 Ian Hlavats 0 Good News http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=33424
Well how is it diffrent from model used by say jboss?

There are two key differences:

1) Ability to fork and distribute - If JBoss doesn't accept your patch you can stilldo it yourself and *distribute* the...]]> Thu, 21 Apr 2005 07:25:05 -0400 Thu, 21 Apr 2005 07:25:05 -0400 Thu, 21 Apr 2005 07:25:05 -0400 Apr 21, 2005 Cameron Purdy 0 Good News http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=33424 Thu, 21 Apr 2005 06:44:24 -0400 Thu, 21 Apr 2005 06:44:24 -0400 Thu, 21 Apr 2005 06:44:24 -0400 Apr 21, 2005 Joseph Ottinger 0 Good News http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=33424 This is no issue with JDK. For projects written in commercial environment nobody uses bleeding edge and unstable jdks. There is still a lot of companies considering switching now to jdk ... 1.4. And really proliferation of forked version of...]]> Thu, 21 Apr 2005 06:03:48 -0400 Thu, 21 Apr 2005 06:03:48 -0400 Thu, 21 Apr 2005 06:03:48 -0400 Apr 21, 2005 JT Wenting 0 Good News http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=33424 There are two key differences:1) Ability to fork and distributeIf JBoss doesn't accept your patch you can still do it yourself and *distribute* the result.
</blackquote>

Isn't' it something that you discourage and actively...]]> Thu, 21 Apr 2005 03:37:57 -0400 Thu, 21 Apr 2005 03:37:57 -0400 Thu, 21 Apr 2005 03:37:57 -0400 Apr 21, 2005 Michal Maczka 1 Spoiled by Open-Source http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=33424 Ever tried to send a patch to Microsoft? ;-)
Downloaded the source code of .NET lately?

I'm still amazed by Sun's move and only good...]]> Thu, 21 Apr 2005 03:35:57 -0400 Thu, 21 Apr 2005 03:35:57 -0400 Thu, 21 Apr 2005 03:35:57 -0400 Apr 21, 2005 Jochen Bedersdorfer 0 Applying JRL: A developer fixes the JDK http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=33424 I think the risk of forking the code in several platforms is quite high if this happens. It seems to me that Sun is doing a good job...]]> Thu, 21 Apr 2005 03:20:03 -0400 Thu, 21 Apr 2005 03:20:03 -0400 Thu, 21 Apr 2005 03:20:03 -0400 Apr 21, 2005 Jose Ramon Diaz 1 two key differences http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=33424
Production usage:
For any Quality consious company this is essentially a good thing. If I make a fix to JDK and want use the fix in production i definitely want to leverage the QA process that...]]> Thu, 21 Apr 2005 03:08:40 -0400 Thu, 21 Apr 2005 03:08:40 -0400 Thu, 21 Apr 2005 03:08:40 -0400 Apr 21, 2005 Kumar Mettu 0 Good News http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=33424
Work for whom? "Collaborative source" for instance seems to work more for the software company than for the collaborators...
Won't you (me, everyone) benefit from Andi's patches?
+1 !!!]]> Thu, 21 Apr 2005 02:49:15 -0400 Thu, 21 Apr 2005 02:49:15 -0400 Thu, 21 Apr 2005 02:49:15 -0400 Apr 21, 2005 han theman 0 Good News http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=33424 Correct.xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Adrian BrockChief ScientistJBoss Inc.xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Just for the record ...
What does a Chief Scientist do ?]]> Thu, 21 Apr 2005 02:42:15 -0400 Thu, 21 Apr 2005 02:42:15 -0400 Thu, 21 Apr 2005 02:42:15 -0400 Apr 21, 2005 Dorel Vaida 0 Good News http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=33424 Well how is it diffrent from model used by say jboss?
There are two key differences:

1) Ability to fork and distribute

If JBoss doesn't accept your patch you can still
do it yourself and *distribute* the...]]> Wed, 20 Apr 2005 22:00:13 -0400 Wed, 20 Apr 2005 22:00:13 -0400 Wed, 20 Apr 2005 22:00:13 -0400 Apr 20, 2005 Adrian Brock 6 Good News http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=33424 Work for whom? "Collaborative source" for instance seems to work more for the software company than for the collaborators...
Well how is it diffrent from model used by say jboss?

And how do you imagine to have...]]> Wed, 20 Apr 2005 16:21:01 -0400 Wed, 20 Apr 2005 16:21:01 -0400 Wed, 20 Apr 2005 16:21:01 -0400 Apr 20, 2005 Michal Maczka 7 Good News http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=33424 Work for whom? "Collaborative source" for instance seems to work more for the software company than for the collaborators...Won't you (me, everyone) benefit from Andi's patches?]]> Wed, 20 Apr 2005 16:16:21 -0400 Wed, 20 Apr 2005 16:16:21 -0400 Wed, 20 Apr 2005 16:16:21 -0400 Apr 20, 2005 Henrique Steckelberg 2