<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>











<rss version="2.0" xmlns:jf="http://www.jivesoftware.com/xmlns/jiveforums/rss">



<channel>
    <title>Support Forums: Message List - PMD 3.1, a Java Source Code analyser is released.</title>
    <link>http://www.theserverside.com</link>
    <description>Most recent forum messages</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
        <generator>Jive Forums Silver 5.5.30 (www.jivesoftware.com)</generator>
    
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 23:54:13 -0400</pubDate>


    <item>

        <title>poor performance</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=33852</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Hi John -<br><br>Sure, is there any particular rule you noticed that was slow?  Some of the XPath rules are pretty sluggish... but I could port any serious laggards to Java if someone asked for it.  By the way, there's a little table here:<br><br><a...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2005 16:13:19 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2005 16:13:19 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2005 16:13:19 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jul 1, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Tom Copeland</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>PMD 3.1 speed</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=33852</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Heh, yup, it's a bit slow.  If there's any particular rule you feel is really sluggish, please post to the PMD project and I'll see if I can optimize it...<br><br>Yours,<br><br>Tom]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2005 16:10:06 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2005 16:10:06 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2005 16:10:06 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jul 1, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Tom Copeland</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>JDK 1.5 is supported in PMD...</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=33852</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[...when it's run via the Ant task or from the command line.   I think Philippe has modified the Eclipse plugin in CVS to support a &quot;1.5&quot; checkbox.  So, it's on the way!<br><br>Yours,<br><br>tom]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2005 16:08:39 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2005 16:08:39 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2005 16:08:39 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jul 1, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Tom Copeland</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>No support for Java 5.0</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=33852</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[I am using the latest eclipse plugin for PMD, it's complaining about JDK5.0 is not supported. If that's the case it a drawback for PMD.<br><br>I am kind of leaning towards Hammurapi, because of its reports.]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 12 May 2005 12:26:07 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 12 May 2005 12:26:07 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 12 May 2005 12:26:07 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>May 12, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Sreenivasa Majji</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>How different it is from Hammurapi</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=33852</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Checkstyle has a huge set of checks - much more than just formatting and javadoc checks. It is also very extensible for custom checks and performs very well. Not to say it has by far the best eclipse integration, see here <a...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 12 May 2005 05:21:58 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 12 May 2005 05:21:58 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 12 May 2005 05:21:58 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>May 12, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Lars K??dderitzsch</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>PMD 3.1 speed</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=33852</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[BTW, I read about the potential speed improvements in 3.1, and so not having upgraded for a while, thought I'd check it out versus 2.0.<br><br>The code I ran my rulesets against took 112 seconds with PMD 2.0, and <b>337 seconds</b> with PMD 3.1!<br><br>I...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 12 May 2005 01:39:40 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 12 May 2005 01:39:40 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 12 May 2005 01:39:40 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>May 12, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Jeremy Kraybill</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>3</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>PMD+FindBugs</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=33852</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[In my team, we use PMD+FindBugs. I evaluated Hammurapi and CheckStyle; I found Hammurapi to be much too slow, and many of the rules are either a little pedantic or just plain obvious. It also is a less polished product than PMD.<br><br>CheckStyle is a...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 12 May 2005 01:14:02 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 12 May 2005 01:14:02 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 12 May 2005 01:14:02 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>May 12, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Jeremy Kraybill</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>4</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Step on up to InspectionGadgets</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=33852</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[If you have access to Intellij IDEA then use InspectionGadgets.  Best code analyzer around hands down.]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2005 19:26:21 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 11 May 2005 19:26:21 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 11 May 2005 19:26:21 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>May 11, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Paul Johnson</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>How different it is from Hammurapi</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=33852</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[I am also looking at Hammurapi, PMD, CheckStyle and Findbugs.  Recommendations, thoughts and opinions would be appreciated.<br><br>Regards,<br><br>Joshua]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2005 15:00:49 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 11 May 2005 15:00:49 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 11 May 2005 15:00:49 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>May 11, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Joshua White</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>6</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Slow</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=33852</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Nice tool overall, but God, did it became slow in v3 (at least when running Eclipse plugin)! Loads processor 100% and takes forewer to run. I don't recall this being such bad in v2. :-(]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2005 13:03:18 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 11 May 2005 13:03:18 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 11 May 2005 13:03:18 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>May 11, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Dmitri Maximovich</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>How different it is from Hammurapi</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=33852</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[We are weighing on Hammurapi, PMD, CheckStyle and Findbugs. Can sombody gives me their opinion on this?]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2005 11:00:56 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 11 May 2005 11:00:56 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 11 May 2005 11:00:56 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>May 11, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Sreenivasa Majji</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>8</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>poor performance</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=33852</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[PMD is a nice tool and I have integrated it into our build process. Unfortunately, PMD is also REALLY slow and hogs all CPU. PMD spends about 2-3 seconds per class eventhough I have only a couple of default rulesets enabled. I wonder if it's possible to...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2005 09:26:28 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 11 May 2005 09:26:28 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 11 May 2005 09:26:28 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>May 11, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>John Redwood</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>10</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>PMD 3.1, a Java Source Code analyser is released.</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=33852</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Keep up the good work PMD Team !!!.<br><br>We have been using PMD throughout the projects and i have to say, 'It Rocks !!'.]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2005 09:03:28 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 11 May 2005 09:03:28 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 11 May 2005 09:03:28 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>May 11, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Muhammad Mansoor</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>PMD 3.1, a Java Source Code analyser is released.</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=33852</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<a href="http://pmd.sf.net" target="_blank">PMD</a> is a BSD-licensed Java source code analyzer. It finds unused variables, empty catch blocks, unnecessary object creation, and more. It includes CPD, a tool to detect chunks of identical code.<br><br>PMD...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2005 02:56:59 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 11 May 2005 02:56:59 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 11 May 2005 02:56:59 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>May 11, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Hetal Velani</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>13</jf:replyCount>
    </item>



</channel>
</rss>

