<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>











<rss version="2.0" xmlns:jf="http://www.jivesoftware.com/xmlns/jiveforums/rss">



<channel>
    <title>Support Forums: Message List - ApacheDS 0.9 Released: An Enterprise Directory Server Platform</title>
    <link>http://www.theserverside.com</link>
    <description>Most recent forum messages</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
        <generator>Jive Forums Silver 5.5.30 (www.jivesoftware.com)</generator>
    
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 09:44:35 -0400</pubDate>


    <item>

        <title>Re:It looks promising but &amp;quot;experimentation platform&amp;quot; concerns me</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=33878</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Surajeet you seem to be in line with our thinking.  UDDI is sooo easy to implement and snap right in.  Especially with embedding the server into other appservers this feature will be even more appreciated. <br><br>Regardless of appserver integration just...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Sat, 14 May 2005 01:09:10 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Sat, 14 May 2005 01:09:10 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Sat, 14 May 2005 01:09:10 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>May 14, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>alex  karasulu</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Support for server controls?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=33878</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[None there yet but they could be added some very easily.  Any help in this area is much appreciated.]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Sat, 14 May 2005 01:04:54 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Sat, 14 May 2005 01:04:54 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Sat, 14 May 2005 01:04:54 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>May 14, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>alex  karasulu</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>It looks promising but &amp;quot;experimentation platform&amp;quot; concerns me</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=33878</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[No need to worry.  The architecture allows for radical changes to the server using interceptors, plugins and custom backend implementations with a very small learning curve.  This makes ApacheDS ideal for those who want to experiment with it and protocol...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Sat, 14 May 2005 01:03:15 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Sat, 14 May 2005 01:03:15 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Sat, 14 May 2005 01:03:15 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>May 14, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>alex  karasulu</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>OpenLdap comparsion</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=33878</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Yah Marc good summarization! Thanks.  <br><br>Just a couple additional points...<br><br>&nbsp;o ApacheDS has the potential to plugin any protocol especially those services whose information would naturally fit within directory access model.  ApacheDS...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Sat, 14 May 2005 00:57:55 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Sat, 14 May 2005 00:57:55 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Sat, 14 May 2005 00:57:55 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>May 14, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>alex  karasulu</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>ApacheDS 0.9 Released: An Enterprise Directory Server Platform</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=33878</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[I think the issue is less performance then capacity.  100k entries isn't much in an &quot;enterprise&quot; environment.  Then again, an &quot;enterprise&quot; directory needs at minimum hashed passwords, access controls and replication (features that...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2005 16:19:37 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 13 May 2005 16:19:37 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 13 May 2005 16:19:37 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>May 13, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Marc Boorshtein</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>ApacheDS 0.9 Released: An Enterprise Directory Server Platform</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=33878</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[You're being a bit hard.<br>ApacheDS is, as its name implies, a 0.9 version. It has not even been really benchmarked as a whole yet as Emmanuel said.<br><br>Personnally as a first release, I worry more about reliability and simplicity than...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2005 15:29:43 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 13 May 2005 15:29:43 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 13 May 2005 15:29:43 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>May 13, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Stephane Bailliez</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>ApacheDS 0.9 Released: An Enterprise Directory Server Platform</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=33878</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[I wonder why apache calls most of its projects &quot;Enterprise&quot;.<br>I did testing of both ApacheDS (enterprise directory server) and JAMES (enterprise mail server).<br>ApacheDS falls to its knees after I insert 100K plus ldap entries, grows to 1.5G...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2005 12:56:00 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 13 May 2005 12:56:00 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 13 May 2005 12:56:00 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>May 13, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Alexander Zhukov</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>2</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>More info</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=33878</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[MINA 0.7 was an internal release, and we're going to release 0.7.1 very soon.  We've been testing MINA for quite a long time and it didn't show any significant bugs for last month.<br><br>We've not decided release date of 0.9 yet.  0.9 will provide...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 12 May 2005 19:37:23 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 12 May 2005 19:37:23 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 12 May 2005 19:37:23 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>May 12, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>trustin</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>More info</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=33878</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[I am interested in knowing more about MINA and its roadmap. On the ApacheDS website, only version 0.7 has a clear release date and on JIRA I don't remember future versions having attached release dates.<br><br>I played a bit with MINA 0.7.1 (snapshot)...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 12 May 2005 18:40:19 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 12 May 2005 18:40:19 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 12 May 2005 18:40:19 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>May 12, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Horia Muntean</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>OpenLdap comparsion</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=33878</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Thanks, marc. <br><br>Performance has not been really deeply tested, but some of the tests done had shown that ApacheDS is competitive against OpenLdap.<br><br>Some more tests are to be done, and will be, for sure !]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 12 May 2005 14:13:31 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 12 May 2005 14:13:31 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 12 May 2005 14:13:31 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>May 12, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>lecharny emmanuel</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re:It looks promising but &amp;quot;experimentation platform&amp;quot; concerns me</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=33878</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote> If you want something a little more in an LDAP server, and don't mind crafting it yourself, then ApacheDS may well be a fine starting point.If you want a Java based LDAP server (for whatever reason), then you might want to consider...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 12 May 2005 13:50:07 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 12 May 2005 13:50:07 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 12 May 2005 13:50:07 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>May 12, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>surajeet dev</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re:It looks promising but &amp;quot;experimentation platform&amp;quot; concerns me</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=33878</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[That's exactly what it is. An experimentation platform.<br><br>If you're after stock, generic LDAP functionality, then you're probably not in the market for something like ApacheDS. If you want something a little more in an LDAP server, and don't mind...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 12 May 2005 13:15:43 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 12 May 2005 13:15:43 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 12 May 2005 13:15:43 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>May 12, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Will Hartung</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>2</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>&amp;quot;experimentation platform&amp;quot;</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=33878</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>&gt;What do you mean by &quot;experimentation&quot;.  I'm not sure I want to spend the time testing out something that is an &quot;experimentation platform&quot;.</blockquote><br>Hi,<br><br>the sentence is not very explicit about it, and can...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 12 May 2005 13:13:26 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 12 May 2005 13:13:26 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 12 May 2005 13:13:26 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>May 12, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>lecharny emmanuel</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Support for server controls?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=33878</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Does Apache DS support LDAP server controls like Virtual List View, Server-side Sorting, Paged Result sets, etc...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 12 May 2005 12:34:35 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 12 May 2005 12:34:35 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 12 May 2005 12:34:35 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>May 12, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>James Chamberlain</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>It looks promising but &amp;quot;experimentation platform&amp;quot; concerns me</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=33878</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote><ul><li>Designed as an LDAP and X.500 experimentation platform.</li></ul></blockquote><br>What do you mean by &quot;experimentation&quot;.  I'm not sure I want to spend the time testing out something that is an &quot;experimentation...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 12 May 2005 12:12:08 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 12 May 2005 12:12:08 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 12 May 2005 12:12:08 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>May 12, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>artful dodger</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>5</jf:replyCount>
    </item>



</channel>
</rss>

