<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>











<rss version="2.0" xmlns:jf="http://www.jivesoftware.com/xmlns/jiveforums/rss">



<channel>
    <title>Support Forums: Message List - Backport175 1.0 released: Annotations for Java 1.3 &amp;amp; 1.4</title>
    <link>http://www.theserverside.com</link>
    <description>Most recent forum messages</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
        <generator>Jive Forums Silver 5.5.30 (www.jivesoftware.com)</generator>
    
    <pubDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 08:33:04 -0400</pubDate>


    <item>

        <title>Wrong direction</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=34611</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[The actual direction is not to force the user in some or other way, but have your project / lib / framework provide almost the same feature set on both 1.5 and 1.4 - with implicit and undeniable benefits when using 1.5.<br>We have done that for more than...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2005 04:10:36 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2005 04:10:36 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2005 04:10:36 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jun 17, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Alex Vasseur</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Wrong direction</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=34611</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[I think this solution goes the wrong direction. The other direction - develop with jdk 1.5 and port this back to achieve 1.4 or even 1.3 compatibility - i would recommend.<br><br>The tool of choice for this is <a...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2005 02:49:06 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2005 02:49:06 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2005 02:49:06 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jun 17, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>peter jodeleit</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Hibernate 3?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=34611</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[IMO it makes no sense to use annotations wo Java 5. Here are the 2 *very* good reasons to use annotations:<br>&nbsp;- implicit contextual informations: Generic collections are a time saver in conjunction with H3 annotations<br>&nbsp;- Type safety and...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2005 22:07:35 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2005 22:07:35 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2005 22:07:35 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jun 16, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Emmanuel Bernard</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Hibernate 3?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=34611</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Bill<br><br>It is not exactly that. Backport is not intrusive.<br><br>Ones would need to ship java 1.3/1.4 interfaces that mirrors the official Hibernate Java 5 annotations. That 's a fairly straightforward task (Backport does support default values as...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2005 11:58:00 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2005 11:58:00 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2005 11:58:00 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jun 16, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Alex Vasseur</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Hibernate 3?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=34611</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Does this mean that we can use Hibernate 3 anotations with a 1.4 JVM?</blockquote><br>No, because HB3 annotations would have to use Backport.]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2005 11:37:21 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2005 11:37:21 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2005 11:37:21 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jun 16, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Bill Burke</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>2</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Hibernate 3?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=34611</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Does this mean that we can use Hibernate 3 anotations with a 1.4 JVM?]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2005 11:21:49 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2005 11:21:49 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2005 11:21:49 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jun 16, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Matt Giacomini</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>3</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Backport175 1.0 released: Annotations for Java 1.3 &amp;amp; 1.4</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=34611</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[backport175 is porting of the Java 5 annotations (JSR-175) specification to the Java 1.3 and 1.4 platform, making strongly typed annotation available for older JVMs. They are bytecode compatible with Java 5 annotations making them available for use by...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2005 10:28:12 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2005 10:28:12 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2005 10:28:12 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jun 16, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Floyd Marinescu</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>6</jf:replyCount>
    </item>



</channel>
</rss>

