<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>











<rss version="2.0" xmlns:jf="http://www.jivesoftware.com/xmlns/jiveforums/rss">



<channel>
    <title>Support Forums: Message List - Debu Panda on the Persistence Archive</title>
    <link>http://www.theserverside.com</link>
    <description>Most recent forum messages</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
        <generator>Jive Forums Silver 5.5.30 (www.jivesoftware.com)</generator>
    
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 03:43:40 -0400</pubDate>


    <item>

        <title>Make mulch outta the EJB3 spec :) Use Spring and Hibernate</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=35065</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>I really don't know why big corporations throw money out the window buying pricey servers.</blockquote><br>Because big pricey servers can provide lots of performance and reliability.<br><blockquote>Big corporations hesitate to embrace...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2005 13:25:52 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2005 13:25:52 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2005 13:25:52 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jul 14, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Steve Zara</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Make mulch outta the EJB3 spec :) Use Spring and Hibernate</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=35065</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<div class="jive-quote"><div class="jive-quote">Spring adds persistance convience, but not persistance standardization.<br>Each of those on its own(Spring/Hibernate Spring/ibatis...)is standardized. So no inconvenience.<br><br>&gt;&gt;If you like Spring...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2005 12:58:55 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2005 12:58:55 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2005 12:58:55 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jul 14, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>ohIDidntKnowThat ohIDidntKnowThat</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Make mulch outta the EJB3 spec :) Use Spring and Hibernate</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=35065</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>If there was ONE official container I would agree with all you said. Using Spring and Hibernate (at least for now) there is only one setup one has to fight with.</blockquote><br>I like Spring too, it allows me to get a lot of milage out of a...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2005 12:22:38 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2005 12:22:38 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2005 12:22:38 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jul 12, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Matt Giacomini</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>2</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Make mulch outta the EJB3 spec :) Use Spring and Hibernate</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=35065</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>EJB is container-centric.</blockquote><br>EJB 3.0 isn't.<br><blockquote>I have no clue why big companies waste time with EJB3 spec..beyond me. Using Tomcat, Spring and Hibernate any industrial strength application can easily be developed.  So...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2005 11:57:39 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2005 11:57:39 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2005 11:57:39 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jul 12, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Steve Zara</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Make mulch outta the EJB3 spec :) Use Spring and Hibernate</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=35065</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[EJB is container-centric.<br>And each container has its own specific way of doing things (I know the trouble because I have ported an Orion app to JBoss and Weblogic)<br>If there was ONE official container I would agree with all you said. Using Spring...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2005 11:32:38 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2005 11:32:38 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2005 11:32:38 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jul 12, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>ohIDidntKnowThat ohIDidntKnowThat</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>4</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>EJB - Its configurlicious</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=35065</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>I prefer no exceptions.</blockquote><br>and I would prefer to be rich and have magical powers.<br><blockquote>Annotation/configuration just introduces additional complexity</blockquote><br>Additional complexity compaired to what?  <br><br>I...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2005 12:08:37 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2005 12:08:37 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2005 12:08:37 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jul 11, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Matt Giacomini</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Make mulch outta the EJB3 spec :) Use Spring and Hibernate</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=35065</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Evolution is good...but EJB3 is a late evolution </blockquote>Later is much better than never! Most application developers I've spoken are excited about EJB3 and eagerly waiting for EJB3 spec to be finalized.<blockquote>and copied loads from...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2005 10:54:25 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2005 10:54:25 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2005 10:54:25 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jul 11, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Debu Panda</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>5</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>EJB - Its configurlicious</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=35065</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote> Hopefully! Do you perfer Checked Exceptions?</blockquote>I prefer no exceptions. Annotation/configuration just introduces additional complexity and new points of failure without much real benefit.<blockquote>EJB Annotations are meta-data...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2005 05:14:25 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2005 05:14:25 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2005 05:14:25 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jul 11, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Casual Visitor</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Make mulch outta the EJB3 spec :) Use Spring and Hibernate</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=35065</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Seriously?<br>PAR?:) Who comes up with these ridiculous ideas?<br>ejb-jar.xml should have had this info starting with spec 1 (or at least in spec 2)<br>EJB is going to die people. It is a container-dependent architecture. Run away from EJB and embrace...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Sun, 10 Jul 2005 22:00:18 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Sun, 10 Jul 2005 22:00:18 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Sun, 10 Jul 2005 22:00:18 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jul 10, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>ohIDidntKnowThat ohIDidntKnowThat</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>6</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Why not take a critical and objective look at a new technology?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=35065</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>And why not take a critical and objective look at any new technology? Its absolutely essential for the success of enterprise Java to do that and to understand the technology's benefits, drawbacks and when to use it. That's far better than...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2005 19:46:49 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2005 19:46:49 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2005 19:46:49 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jul 8, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Mike Keith</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Why not take a critical and objective look at a new technology?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=35065</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Chris, based upon my experiences with you in the past you have thrown a lot of stones at EJB 3. </blockquote><br>And why not take a critical and objective look at any new technology? Its absolutely essential for the success of enterprise Java...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2005 18:45:31 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2005 18:45:31 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2005 18:45:31 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jul 8, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Chris Richardson</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>EJB 2-style complexity?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=35065</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Chris, based upon my experiences with you in the past you have thrown a lot of stones at EJB 3. I am prepared to give you the benefit of the doubt now, though, and assume that you really are asking questions and not just casting badness for the sake of...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2005 18:01:40 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2005 18:01:40 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2005 18:01:40 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jul 8, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Mike Keith</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>2</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>.har</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=35065</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Hibernate and JDO seem to work just fine without having to package everything up in .par.</blockquote><br>FYI, Hibernate has had the .har packaging format for a quite a while now. It's perhaps not quite perfect yet (the .par format is maybe a...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2005 18:00:04 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2005 18:00:04 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2005 18:00:04 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jul 8, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Gavin King</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>That's the sprit!</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=35065</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[While many consultants and other sources of best practices have gone screaming from EJB (as it would seem Chris has), some have not. In fact, I'd expect a few of the less ethical oned to try to bilk developers with some poor quality books, just because...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2005 17:51:36 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2005 17:51:36 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2005 17:51:36 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jul 8, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>nextdb</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>The definition of FUD</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=35065</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>not a vendor or open source developer with a particular product to push</blockquote><br>Yeah, except for the SIG you use which points to the books you're trying to hawk or the &quot;Professional Services&quot; (wikipedia that) you're trying...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2005 16:58:32 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2005 16:58:32 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2005 16:58:32 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jul 8, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Donald Smith</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>



</channel>
</rss>

