<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>











<rss version="2.0" xmlns:jf="http://www.jivesoftware.com/xmlns/jiveforums/rss">



<channel>
    <title>Support Forums: Message List - First look at Java 5 support in AspectJ, and other new features</title>
    <link>http://www.theserverside.com</link>
    <description>Most recent forum messages</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
        <generator>Jive Forums Silver 5.5.30 (www.jivesoftware.com)</generator>
    
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 00:35:03 -0400</pubDate>


    <item>

        <title>and more</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=35201</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Agree. Moreover..<br>1)If I have the source I can compile with another compiler which *might* have been designed to use optimization better than ajc. I said might...but I would like to have the option of choosing.. <br>2) Decompile the .class does not...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2005 10:37:09 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2005 10:37:09 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2005 10:37:09 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jul 15, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Alan Potsky</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Why not source ?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=35201</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Why do you care which compiler you use? Java compilers don't do much. It would also be slower and more difficult to implement.</blockquote><br>I think the concern is the other way round. People trust code more that they know is valid....]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2005 08:56:10 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2005 08:56:10 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2005 08:56:10 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jul 15, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Karl Banke</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>First look at Java 5 support in AspectJ, and other new features</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=35201</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[I think AspectJ 5 will be a significant advance in the AOP space. As the first major release following the merger with AspectWerkz it adds important new functionality (especially annotation support, enhanced load-time weaving), within the mature,...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2005 08:26:41 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2005 08:26:41 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2005 08:26:41 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jul 14, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Rod Johnson</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Why not source ?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=35201</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Remember when early C++ compilers used to generate C code, and very many people reasoned about their C++ programs in terms of the genenerated code?</blockquote>Oh no, I don't <i>want</i> to remember that. I totally agree with the point about...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2005 08:08:06 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2005 08:08:06 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2005 08:08:06 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jul 14, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Rod Johnson</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Why not source ?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=35201</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[ajc 1.0.x used to have a -preprocess option that would produce source code. <br><br>We dropped the option (a long time ago) because it did more harm than good, not because it was hard. Remember when early C++ compilers used to generate C code, and very...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2005 07:54:34 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2005 07:54:34 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2005 07:54:34 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jul 14, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Adrian Colyer</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>compiler plugin</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=35201</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[I think someone with some influence should introduce a JSR for compiler plugins, so multiple language addons can be used simultaniously (if compatible) and even with multiple compiler.]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2005 04:41:13 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2005 04:41:13 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2005 04:41:13 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jul 14, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Tom Eugelink</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Cuz it's hard</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=35201</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[I would guess that the source generation option was dropped for a few reasons.<br><br>1. This is a preview release, internals are in flux.<br>2. When a product is focused on bytecode and weaving, producing compatible source code is an additional...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2005 20:15:03 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2005 20:15:03 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2005 20:15:03 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jul 13, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Jim Hazen</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Why not source ?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=35201</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Why do you care which compiler you use? Java compilers don't do much. It would also be slower and more difficult to implement.]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2005 13:47:41 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2005 13:47:41 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2005 13:47:41 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jul 13, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Bob Lee</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>2</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Why not source ?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=35201</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[I do not understand why they insist of producing bytecode from aspects and do not give a very useful option (used to be present in ver 1.1 if I remember well) to generate source so that I can use whatever compiler I wish.]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2005 11:07:20 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2005 11:07:20 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2005 11:07:20 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jul 13, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Alan Potsky</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>7</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>First look at Java 5 support in AspectJ, and other new features</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=35201</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Now in its second milestone build, a major focus of <a href="http://www.eclipse.org/aspectj/" target="_blank">AspectJ 5</a> is on providing support for the new Java language features introduced in Java 5, including annotations and generics. AspectJ 5...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2005 10:52:37 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2005 10:52:37 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2005 10:52:37 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jul 13, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Floyd Marinescu</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>9</jf:replyCount>
    </item>



</channel>
</rss>

