<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>











<rss version="2.0" xmlns:jf="http://www.jivesoftware.com/xmlns/jiveforums/rss">



<channel>
    <title>Support Forums: Message List - TSS Asks: Are standards a bad thing?</title>
    <link>http://www.theserverside.com</link>
    <description>Most recent forum messages</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
        <generator>Jive Forums Silver 5.5.30 (www.jivesoftware.com)</generator>
    
    <pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 13:11:50 -0400</pubDate>


    <item>

        <title>EJB</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=37654</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[les EJB c de la balle]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2005 10:35:53 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2005 10:35:53 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2005 10:35:53 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Dec 12, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>EJB lover 0</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Standards are a bad thing</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=37654</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Standards:<br><br>[snip]<br><br>Provide integration lockin</blockquote><br>I disagree with what you are saying in a lot of ways but the above is particularly queer.<br><br>What exactly is 'integration lockin'?  One of the great benefits of...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2005 15:28:59 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2005 15:28:59 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2005 15:28:59 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Nov 29, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>James Watson</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Standards are a bad thing</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=37654</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Standards are for corporations who want to make integration ware and not really for the rest of us. Look at the standards we have today.  HTTP possibly the worst protocol in existence running the internet.  Almost every Java standard is outdated and not...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2005 22:07:04 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2005 22:07:04 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2005 22:07:04 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Nov 28, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>U G</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>2</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Standards Is a Good Thing When They Are Real Standards</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=37654</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Standards is a good thing when they are real standards.<br><br>The problem with the Java community today is that too many smart guys that have no real meaningful job dream up standards in vacuum and force that upon the user community with...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2005 12:09:52 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2005 12:09:52 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2005 12:09:52 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Nov 23, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Hu Shih</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Not at all</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=37654</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Most of those &quot;popular frameworks&quot; are all either build on top of, or provide their most valuable integration functionality with JCP standards.<br><br>As such, the proper way to view things is that standards, at least the good ones, are what...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2005 03:51:23 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2005 03:51:23 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2005 03:51:23 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Nov 23, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>James Loverde</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>TSS Asks: Are standards a bad thing?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=37654</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>But where does EJB fit?I think there is general agreement that EJB fits the latter description and that EJB before 3.0 was pretty horrible.</blockquote><br>Actually Session EJBs were based on lessons and patterns from other technologies such...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2005 13:41:11 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2005 13:41:11 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2005 13:41:11 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Nov 22, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>William Childers</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Java better since JCP got stronger</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=37654</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[I think that about the time .NET came out in 2001, Sun decided to strengthen and give new life to the JCP. Since then things in the java world have got better: compare j2ee 1.3 (largely created outside of the jcp) width j2ee 1.5 that is coming out, or...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2005 09:44:29 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2005 09:44:29 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2005 09:44:29 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Nov 22, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Carlo Marchiori</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>TSS Asks: Are standards a bad thing?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=37654</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Is this a troll ???<br><br>Just think about your everyday life before posting such silly things : your are relying on standards in every move you make !<br>You computer is nothing but an assy of standards.<br>Your house is built upon standards.<br>Your...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2005 15:36:00 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2005 15:36:00 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2005 15:36:00 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Nov 21, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Remi Vankeisbelck</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>TSS Asks: Are standards a bad thing?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=37654</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Interesting discussion!  I'd like to suggest that standards are good when they fill a need and outline a workable (not necessarily a good) solution.<br><br>Several people have contrasted TCP/IP and OSI, and concluded that standards based on experience...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2005 15:25:20 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2005 15:25:20 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2005 15:25:20 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Nov 21, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Tony Walker</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Java standards are not (necessarily) standards</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=37654</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>If there is no organization to pick 'the one true spec.' as you call it, then you can easily end up with many technically equivalent specs and no clear reason to coose one over the other.</blockquote><br>You also need 'the one true...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2005 13:45:05 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2005 13:45:05 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2005 13:45:05 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Nov 21, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Erik Engbrecht</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Java standards are not (necessarily) standards</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=37654</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote><blockquote>That's an example of why letting the market decide isn't always a good idea.  Look at the debacle between Blue-ray and HD-DVD.  Very few consumers are going to purchase players for either standard until the vendors get that...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2005 13:22:01 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2005 13:22:01 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2005 13:22:01 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Nov 21, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>James Watson</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Standards are more useful for matured technologies</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=37654</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote><blockquote> It is insurance against a vendor changing support or licensing at any time in the future. </blockquote>I prefer to solve this problem using open source software and I think standards are usefull for integration only. Most JCP...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2005 08:57:47 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2005 08:57:47 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2005 08:57:47 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Nov 21, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Steve Zara</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Standards are more useful for matured technologies</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=37654</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote> It is insurance against a vendor changing support or licensing at any time in the future. </blockquote>I prefer to solve this problem using open source software and I think standards are usefull for integration only. Most JCP standards are...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2005 08:23:26 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2005 08:23:26 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2005 08:23:26 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Nov 21, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Juozas Baliuka</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Standards are more useful for matured technologies</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=37654</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>It just an opinion based on my practice, it is not &quot;the truth&quot;. If you are switching between different vendor's products and it is a typical evaluation process then standard makes sence.</blockquote><br>This is not to do with...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2005 07:31:26 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2005 07:31:26 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2005 07:31:26 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Nov 21, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Steve Zara</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>2</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Standards are more useful for matured technologies</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=37654</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[It just an opinion based on my practice, it is not &quot;the truth&quot;. If you are switching between different vendor's products and it is a typical evaluation process then standard makes sence.]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2005 06:33:40 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2005 06:33:40 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2005 06:33:40 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Nov 21, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Juozas Baliuka</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>3</jf:replyCount>
    </item>



</channel>
</rss>

