<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>











<rss version="2.0" xmlns:jf="http://www.jivesoftware.com/xmlns/jiveforums/rss">



<channel>
    <title>Support Forums: Message List - The AJAX effect on Server Load</title>
    <link>http://www.theserverside.com</link>
    <description>Most recent forum messages</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
        <generator>Jive Forums Silver 5.5.30 (www.jivesoftware.com)</generator>
    
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 20:40:00 -0400</pubDate>


    <item>

        <title>AJAX is PERFECT!!! Gresham's Law in action (again)</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=37929</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Agree! My clients are impressed with Ajax. It's what my clients need at least.]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 01 Mar 2006 21:02:33 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 01 Mar 2006 21:02:33 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 01 Mar 2006 21:02:33 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Mar 1, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Jorn Knarvik</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>AJAX is PERFECT!!! Gresham's Law in action (again)</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=37929</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[AJAX is the newest in a depressingly long list of hacked-up solutions to the &quot;web as platform&quot; problem.  All it lacks to make it a first-class, undisputed heavyweight contender for &quot;your job is all debugging, all the time&quot; status is...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2005 15:48:13 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2005 15:48:13 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2005 15:48:13 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Dec 13, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Dereck Haskins</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>AJAX not the answer -&amp;gt; very likely</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=37929</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[At least there is some tendency to think about appropriate user interfaces for web applications, as pure HTML is often not sufficient and leads to awkward user experience.<br>AJAX is currently the hype technology on the RIA market, but has already proven...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2005 09:57:32 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2005 09:57:32 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2005 09:57:32 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Dec 9, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Patrick Paroa</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>We made the decision decades ago</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=37929</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Remember the age of green terminals? Remember how people argued extraordinary resource requirement for running GUI apps?<br><br>No double that more communication bandwidth and server power are required to enable RIA. The bottom line is that users are...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2005 21:33:42 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2005 21:33:42 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2005 21:33:42 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Dec 8, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Tom Yeh</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>AJAX not the answer -&amp;gt; better technologies</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=37929</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[There ARE better solutions than AJAX available in the RIA space already. E.g. light weight client-side Swing apps.<br>If you combine this with Java Webstart, then you can easily<br>deploy (even) mission critical rich Internet applications.<br>One example...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2005 12:18:29 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2005 12:18:29 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2005 12:18:29 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Dec 8, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Daniel Pfeifer</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Performance Insight Article: Network Latency for Remote Client</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=37929</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Hi,<br><br>The following link might be useful in understanding the impact of clients with heavy (and highly interactive) workflow logic that creates a significant number of client-to-server roundtrips.<br><br><a...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2005 08:07:26 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2005 08:07:26 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2005 08:07:26 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Dec 8, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>wlouth</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>but what sense?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=37929</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Here is the documentation on what using APR allows in Tomcat (detaling benefits for HTTP, HTTPS, and AJP):<br><a href="http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-5.5-doc/apr.html" target="_blank">http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-5.5-doc/apr.html</a>]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2005 04:26:39 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2005 04:26:39 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2005 04:26:39 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Dec 8, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Remy Maucherat</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>I agree, but</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=37929</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[I agree with idea, but my counter argument was againts such a thouht that &quot;Tomcat cannot serve 10K because coyote doesn't utilize nio&quot;. I think it is totally wrong thesis,<br>so my anwser is &quot;No matter whether Tomcat can serve 10K, It is...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2005 02:50:41 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2005 02:50:41 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2005 02:50:41 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Dec 8, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Eugene Lucash</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>The AJAX effect on Server Load</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=37929</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Hi all,Have to agree with the comments re: JavaScript, not very pleasant to work with when you start to get lots of it. Cross browser is another problem as is its quirky interpretation .... although I'd watch out that I wasn't putting too...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2005 22:29:08 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2005 22:29:08 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2005 22:29:08 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Dec 7, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Henri Chen</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>but what sense?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=37929</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>It seams that you don't read previous post.1. Tomcat coyote http1.1 connector DOES USE NIO (explictly or by jdk's 1.4+ iostreams facade). I review sources recently so I'm sure.2. Tomcat5.5.12+ now has apr native library with full power of...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2005 19:11:23 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2005 19:11:23 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2005 19:11:23 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Dec 7, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Guglielmo Lichtner</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>2</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>but what sense?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=37929</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[It seams that you don't read previous post.<br>1. Tomcat coyote http1.1 connector DOES USE NIO (explictly or by jdk's 1.4+ iostreams facade). I review sources recently so I'm sure.<br>2. Tomcat5.5.12+ now has apr native library with full power of Apache...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2005 18:33:40 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2005 18:33:40 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2005 18:33:40 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Dec 7, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Eugene Lucash</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>3</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>All is right</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=37929</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[You need asynchronous IO (it's a feature of NIO) in order to go with 10K connections in java. FileInputStream may be based on NIO but the API forces you to work with one thread / stream and this is not very helpfull. Coyote connector does not use async...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2005 15:11:34 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2005 15:11:34 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2005 15:11:34 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Dec 7, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Horia Muntean</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>4</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>re: about tomcat</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=37929</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[So basically, usage of Apache Httpd in front of tomcat5.5 is no longer recommended even for static resources.<br>High performance apr with openSSL and other goodies are in tomcat now.<br>Benchmarks shows same performance (google if you want)]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2005 13:50:46 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2005 13:50:46 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2005 13:50:46 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Dec 7, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Eugene Lucash</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>All is right</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=37929</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[1. jdk 1.4+ (not only 1.5+)<br>&nbsp;see jdk source code, for example FileInputStream and like<br>&nbsp;and you will see usage of nio. So now classic java iostreams  is facade over nio.<br><br>2. I meant tomcat5.5.12 without Apache httpd, but only with...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2005 13:37:47 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2005 13:37:47 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2005 13:37:47 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Dec 7, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Eugene Lucash</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>6</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>re: about tomcat</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=37929</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>on jdk &gt; 1.4  all  iostreams internally use nio.Moreover, tomcat5.5.12 now can use native Apr lib for http1.1 connector.So tomcat will fit perfectly.</blockquote><br>1) I find your assertion about 1.5+ very difficult to believe. Do you...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2005 13:01:52 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2005 13:01:52 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2005 13:01:52 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Dec 7, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Guglielmo Lichtner</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>7</jf:replyCount>
    </item>



</channel>
</rss>

