<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>











<rss version="2.0" xmlns:jf="http://www.jivesoftware.com/xmlns/jiveforums/rss">



<channel>
    <title>Support Forums: Message List - Asynchronous Messaging Made Easy With Spring JMS</title>
    <link>http://www.theserverside.com</link>
    <description>Most recent forum messages</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
        <generator>Jive Forums Silver 5.5.30 (www.jivesoftware.com)</generator>
    
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 19:39:40 -0400</pubDate>


    <item>

        <title>Missing the point?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=39148</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Gabriel, if you'd rather spend your time reinventing system-level wheels why not just give up application programming and start writing your own operating system? In my opinion, Spring's JMS implementation is a welcome abstraction that adds another arrow...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Sun, 09 Apr 2006 14:22:15 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Sun, 09 Apr 2006 14:22:15 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Sun, 09 Apr 2006 14:22:15 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Apr 9, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Brendan Curran</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Spring makes it little easier</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=39148</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>No not really - not if annotations are done correctly.  Annotations should be broad concepts not configuration-specific.For example if I mark a method as@Remote or @RequiresTransactionI shouldn't have to &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;1) Configure it...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 01 Mar 2006 04:43:51 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 01 Mar 2006 04:43:51 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 01 Mar 2006 04:43:51 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Mar 1, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Guido Anzuoni</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Asynchronous Messaging Made Easy With Spring JMS</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=39148</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Use Spring's general bean container and JNDI support to factor out JNDI lookup information and pass ConnectionFactory/Queue/etc as bean references into application components. This is the typically perceived XML configuration part, which is...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2006 19:46:27 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2006 19:46:27 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2006 19:46:27 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Feb 27, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Gabriel K.</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Spring makes it little easier</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=39148</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote><blockquote>I do agree that we are haunted by more and more XML configurations but i think Tiger probably would take away most of the pain through annotations.</blockquote>So you have to recompile the source if you needto change...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2006 12:51:53 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2006 12:51:53 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2006 12:51:53 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Feb 27, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>George Coller</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Asynchronous Messaging Made Easy With Spring JMS</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=39148</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>I am not sure the comparison is relevant. When you implement a database access with an ORM, the XML files are used each time there is an access to the database. No more cut/paste of the fields, no more : The factorization is important.When...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2006 07:48:19 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2006 07:48:19 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2006 07:48:19 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Feb 27, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Juergen Hoeller</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>2</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>I found it useful ...</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=39148</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Please stop from publishing these kinds of articles.</blockquote><br>These comments don't add any value. The articles may not be everyone's cup of tea, but they are still informative and promote discussion on alternatives - as has been the...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2006 06:55:39 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2006 06:55:39 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2006 06:55:39 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Feb 27, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Matt Byrne</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Asynchronous Messaging Made Easy With Spring JMS</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=39148</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[I am not sure the comparison is relevant. When you implement a database access with an ORM, the XML files are used each time there is an access to the database. No more cut/paste of the fields, no more : The factorization is important.<br>When you use...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Sun, 26 Feb 2006 08:07:12 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Sun, 26 Feb 2006 08:07:12 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Sun, 26 Feb 2006 08:07:12 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Feb 26, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Gabriel K.</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>3</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Asynchronous Messaging Made Easy With Spring JMS</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=39148</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>traditional approach: 48 lines of Java (22 statements). Spring: 11 lines of Java (7 statements), 55 lines of XML (30 elements). Why do Spring people hate Java so much?</blockquote><br>Food for thought: Consider a traditional plain JDBC-based...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Sat, 25 Feb 2006 17:49:38 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Sat, 25 Feb 2006 17:49:38 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Sat, 25 Feb 2006 17:49:38 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Feb 25, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Juergen Hoeller</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>4</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Asynchronous Messaging Made Easy With Spring JMS</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=39148</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[More importantly, it's a good thing when moving between environments, such as development, QA, and production. WHile not everyone has the separate deployment teams that Sun envisioned when writing up the original J2EE specs, most everyone has an...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Sat, 25 Feb 2006 15:57:06 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Sat, 25 Feb 2006 15:57:06 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Sat, 25 Feb 2006 15:57:06 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Feb 25, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Drew McAuliffe</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Asynchronous Messaging Made Easy With Spring JMS</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=39148</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Why do Spring people hate Java so much?</blockquote><br>Configuration moved to XML means less opportunities for developer to make assumptions about deployment environment. You are not forced to recompile the code in case you need to change...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Sat, 25 Feb 2006 05:29:37 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Sat, 25 Feb 2006 05:29:37 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Sat, 25 Feb 2006 05:29:37 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Feb 25, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Dariusz Debowczyk</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Asynchronous Messaging Made Easy With Spring JMS</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=39148</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Some statistics for code in the article (after a more sensible layout and deletion of blank lines):<br><br>traditional approach: 48 lines of Java (22 statements)<br>Spring: 11 lines of Java (7 statements), 55 lines of XML (30 elements)<br><br>Why do...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Sat, 25 Feb 2006 04:19:03 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Sat, 25 Feb 2006 04:19:03 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Sat, 25 Feb 2006 04:19:03 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Feb 25, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Bostjan Dolenc</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>7</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Asynchronous Messaging Made Easy With Spring JMS</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=39148</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[I think one great example of vendor portability is going between just about any commercial server out there and Tomcat. The JNDI implementation of Tomcat is a pain to use, and all of the properties are slightly different (if I'm not mistaken, Tomcat...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2006 15:49:32 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2006 15:49:32 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2006 15:49:32 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Feb 24, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Drew McAuliffe</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Spring makes it little easier</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=39148</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Went through the article, showed how to use Spring for sending JMS message to a queue. I believe this was already available in previous versions of Spring. I was hoping to find an example for 'asynchronous' receive in the new version being described by...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2006 13:25:29 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2006 13:25:29 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2006 13:25:29 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Feb 24, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Mario Pangan</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Spring makes it little easier</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=39148</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>I do agree that we are haunted by more and more XML configurations but i think Tiger probably would take away most of the pain through annotations.</blockquote><br>So you have to recompile the source if you need<br>to change...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2006 07:31:51 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2006 07:31:51 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2006 07:31:51 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Feb 24, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Guido Anzuoni</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>3</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Asynchronous Messaging Made Easy With Spring JMS</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=39148</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[I disagree that JMS is not easy. It's not as easy as it could be, but it is definitely easy. But you do bring some interesting points about the Spring JMS benefits:<br><br>1. Unchecked exceptions. I agree with you, but I am not sure if we are right. The...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2006 05:12:46 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2006 05:12:46 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2006 05:12:46 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Feb 24, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Petar Bodor</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>



</channel>
</rss>

