Support Forums: Message List - SLF4J 1.0 (final) has been released http://www.theserverside.com Most recent forum messages en Jive Forums Silver 5.5.30 (www.jivesoftware.com) Sat, 25 May 2013 17:48:43 -0400 Because java.util.logging sucks big time! http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=39369 Ok, I'm sure I'm missing the boat here and I'm sure that I'm going to get the crap kicked out of me for asking a question here on TSS ... but, why not just use the java.util.logging classes?
See Ceki's critique of...]]> Wed, 15 Mar 2006 17:37:15 -0500 Wed, 15 Mar 2006 17:37:15 -0500 Wed, 15 Mar 2006 17:37:15 -0500 Mar 15, 2006 Daniel Serodio 0 Re: please explain http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=39369
In addition to relief from the ClassLoader issues, the MessageFormat approach is great mechanism...]]> Wed, 15 Mar 2006 02:51:07 -0500 Wed, 15 Mar 2006 02:51:07 -0500 Wed, 15 Mar 2006 02:51:07 -0500 Mar 15, 2006 Sean Reith 0 A Solution for the Confusion http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=39369 Tue, 14 Mar 2006 15:53:20 -0500 Tue, 14 Mar 2006 15:53:20 -0500 Tue, 14 Mar 2006 15:53:20 -0500 Mar 14, 2006 Elmira Fudd 0 SLF4J 1.0 (final) has been released http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=39369 Mon, 13 Mar 2006 10:15:41 -0500 Mon, 13 Mar 2006 10:15:41 -0500 Mon, 13 Mar 2006 10:15:41 -0500 Mar 13, 2006 ceki Gulcu 1 Think again before adopting the commons-logging API http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=39369
The example java.util.logger code is a copy from the log4j code. This actually shows why there has not been widespread adoption of...]]> Mon, 13 Mar 2006 02:52:23 -0500 Mon, 13 Mar 2006 02:52:23 -0500 Mon, 13 Mar 2006 02:52:23 -0500 Mar 13, 2006 Larry Singer 0 SLF4J 1.0 (final) has been released http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=39369 Did you mean your "SuperWrapperAbstractFactoryFactoryFacade" ?
Possibly. The name isn't final yet.
However the purpose is to act as an abstract factory factory facade wrapper to Spring, Pico, custom Factories and...]]> Sun, 12 Mar 2006 11:22:05 -0500 Sun, 12 Mar 2006 11:22:05 -0500 Sun, 12 Mar 2006 11:22:05 -0500 Mar 12, 2006 Wille Faler 0 SLF4J 1.0 (final) has been released http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=39369 Sat, 11 Mar 2006 17:25:24 -0500 Sat, 11 Mar 2006 17:25:24 -0500 Sat, 11 Mar 2006 17:25:24 -0500 Mar 11, 2006 Eugene Lucash 1 SLF4J 1.0 (final) has been released http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=39369 Sat, 11 Mar 2006 12:19:52 -0500 Sat, 11 Mar 2006 12:19:52 -0500 Sat, 11 Mar 2006 12:19:52 -0500 Mar 11, 2006 Wille Faler 2 java.util.logging capabilities clarification http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=39369 Commons Logging is the logger of choice since it doesn't tie you down to any implementation of logging. If you need to send the logs VIA JMS,put a log scraper in, search for certain entries, display them on some console or whatever all you...]]> Sat, 11 Mar 2006 05:17:56 -0500 Sat, 11 Mar 2006 05:17:56 -0500 Sat, 11 Mar 2006 05:17:56 -0500 Mar 11, 2006 Joseph Ottinger 0 libraries and applications http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=39369 It is useful for libraries, so they don't have to push their logging-framework choice on you, not mentioning having two 3rd-party lib with seperate log framework. As for applications, you're right. Stick with one, and you can use all your...]]> Sat, 11 Mar 2006 04:05:51 -0500 Sat, 11 Mar 2006 04:05:51 -0500 Sat, 11 Mar 2006 04:05:51 -0500 Mar 11, 2006 jilles van gurp 0 Your survey is excellent and rational http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=39369 Fri, 10 Mar 2006 19:39:57 -0500 Fri, 10 Mar 2006 19:39:57 -0500 Fri, 10 Mar 2006 19:39:57 -0500 Mar 10, 2006 Elmira Fudd 0 It can work WITH the Commons Logging API http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=39369 "do we really need another ____?" It's a fair question and should be considered everytime a new libary comes out. Some people just suffer from NIH syndrome and have to make their own version of something when it doesn't offer any...]]> Fri, 10 Mar 2006 17:52:21 -0500 Fri, 10 Mar 2006 17:52:21 -0500 Fri, 10 Mar 2006 17:52:21 -0500 Mar 10, 2006 Konstantin Ignatyev 1 Who would avoid using a library because of java.util.logging? http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=39369 Fri, 10 Mar 2006 17:11:46 -0500 Fri, 10 Mar 2006 17:11:46 -0500 Fri, 10 Mar 2006 17:11:46 -0500 Mar 10, 2006 Brian Smith 0 It can work WITH the Commons Logging API http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=39369
It's a fair question and should be considered everytime a new libary comes out. Some people just suffer from NIH syndrome and have to make their own version of something when it doesn't offer any real...]]> Fri, 10 Mar 2006 16:12:31 -0500 Fri, 10 Mar 2006 16:12:31 -0500 Fri, 10 Mar 2006 16:12:31 -0500 Mar 10, 2006 Marc Stock 2 Comparison of slf4j implementations - x4juli http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=39369 To have an overview of features and a comparison to JUL have a look at:
http://www.x4juli.org/features.html
x4juli: A port of log4j to jdk14 API. Why anyone...]]> Fri, 10 Mar 2006 15:45:27 -0500 Fri, 10 Mar 2006 15:45:27 -0500 Fri, 10 Mar 2006 15:45:27 -0500 Mar 10, 2006 Boris Unckel 0