<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>











<rss version="2.0" xmlns:jf="http://www.jivesoftware.com/xmlns/jiveforums/rss">



<channel>
    <title>Support Forums: Message List - Opinion: Will Google Web Toolkit Matter?</title>
    <link>http://www.theserverside.com</link>
    <description>Most recent forum messages</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
        <generator>Jive Forums Silver 5.5.30 (www.jivesoftware.com)</generator>
    
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 00:43:58 -0400</pubDate>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Opinion: Will Google Web Toolkit Matter?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=41743</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Oh My God, does nobody remember NetDynamics!!!! The enormously large unsuccessful application server that SUN killed off in 2002. 

They called it w3spider (the spider in the web) it was equally flawed and limited.]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 09:11:10 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 09:11:10 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 09:11:10 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Dec 10, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>wozza xing</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Opinion: Will Google Web Toolkit Matter?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=41743</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>I do agree with you that the main problem is the HTML platform.</blockquote>...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 15 Aug 2006 08:16:42 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 15 Aug 2006 08:16:42 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 15 Aug 2006 08:16:42 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Aug 15, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Cameron Purdy</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: JSF as standards-based alternative for GWT</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=41743</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[I see too many things about "replacements" GWT and Struts, JSF or other, like :...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 15 Aug 2006 05:44:06 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 15 Aug 2006 05:44:06 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 15 Aug 2006 05:44:06 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Aug 15, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Alexandr Smirnov</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Opinion: Will Google Web Toolkit Matter?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=41743</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>The biggest problem with GWT is that it flat-out requires programmers.<br><br>How many years now have we been striving for the ideal that you could have page designers and graphics artists handling the UI with little more than simple markup,...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 15 Aug 2006 04:01:18 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 15 Aug 2006 04:01:18 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 15 Aug 2006 04:01:18 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Aug 15, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Pierre Queinnec</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: JSF as standards-based alternative for GWT</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=41743</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote><blockquote>Well, I personally think that JSF sucks beyond a reasonable doubt. </blockquote><br><br>That's a strong opinion. Can you please explain why? And if JSF sucks, why integrate with Aranea?</blockquote>...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 15 Aug 2006 03:59:41 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 15 Aug 2006 03:59:41 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 15 Aug 2006 03:59:41 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Aug 15, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Jevgeni Kabanov</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Opinion: Will Google Web Toolkit Matter?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=41743</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[The biggest problem with GWT is that it flat-out requires programmers....]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 15 Aug 2006 01:35:39 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 15 Aug 2006 01:35:39 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 15 Aug 2006 01:35:39 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Aug 15, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>fzammetti</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>It doesnt matter</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=41743</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[You know we can all argue and speculate about what framework is good or bad or what should or shouldn't be in a web application, but it all doesn't really matter.  In the end as a user (yes, even though I'm developer), what I want is an application that...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 14 Aug 2006 23:25:26 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 14 Aug 2006 23:25:26 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 14 Aug 2006 23:25:26 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Aug 14, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Steven Peh</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: JSF as standards-based alternative for GWT</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=41743</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Well, I personally think that JSF sucks beyond a reasonable doubt.</blockquote>...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 14 Aug 2006 19:24:59 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 14 Aug 2006 19:24:59 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 14 Aug 2006 19:24:59 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Aug 14, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Mark Maslow</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: JSF as standards-based alternative for GWT</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=41743</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Well, I personally think that JSF sucks beyond a reasonable doubt. </blockquote>

That's a strong opinion. Can you please explain why? And if JSF sucks, why integrate with Aranea?]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 14 Aug 2006 18:26:46 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 14 Aug 2006 18:26:46 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 14 Aug 2006 18:26:46 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Aug 14, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>JepCastelein</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Saddle on a cow?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=41743</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>CSS is a natural extension to HTML, it allows to create semantic HTML, something that was lost starting with HTML 2.0 release. The ability to load and parse XML and to be able to process it with client-side XSLT pushes the idea of semantic...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 14 Aug 2006 15:48:22 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 14 Aug 2006 15:48:22 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 14 Aug 2006 15:48:22 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Aug 14, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Jevgeni Kabanov</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: JSF as standards-based alternative for GWT</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=41743</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>It surprises me that nobody has mentioned JavaServer Faces (JSF) as an alternative for GWT. <br><br>Full disclosure: I work for Backbase (<a href="http://www.backbase.com" target="_blank">http://www.backbase.com</a>), one of the commercial...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 14 Aug 2006 15:36:30 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 14 Aug 2006 15:36:30 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 14 Aug 2006 15:36:30 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Aug 14, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Jevgeni Kabanov</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>3</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>It will matter to somebody but probably not you.</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=41743</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[GUI's are notoriously customized and application specific.  IMO they are at the heart of user service, because one mans "great feature" is anothers "unnecessary burden."  Google's done a great job of providing a toolkit, but anything they've done is one...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 14 Aug 2006 15:04:28 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 14 Aug 2006 15:04:28 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 14 Aug 2006 15:04:28 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Aug 14, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>functionform</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>JSF as standards-based alternative for GWT</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=41743</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[It surprises me that nobody has mentioned JavaServer Faces (JSF) as an alternative for GWT. Although GWT is very easy to work with, the API is specific to Google. JSF is implemented by multiple vendors, is also easy to use, and some implementations offer...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 14 Aug 2006 14:58:46 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 14 Aug 2006 14:58:46 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 14 Aug 2006 14:58:46 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Aug 14, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>JepCastelein</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>5</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>It will matter.</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=41743</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Google didn't create this tool for "Highly responsive" and "Develop quickly" reasons (not sure about "sexy" thing). These things could be done with the approach that you're suggested for your "complex" Enterprise UI:...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 14 Aug 2006 13:30:39 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 14 Aug 2006 13:30:39 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 14 Aug 2006 13:30:39 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Aug 14, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Nathan Oen</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Opinion: Will Google Web Toolkit Matter?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=41743</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[GWT has the potential to remain relevant for some time to come....]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 14 Aug 2006 13:10:54 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 14 Aug 2006 13:10:54 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 14 Aug 2006 13:10:54 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Aug 14, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Thomas Meeks</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>



</channel>
</rss>

