<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>











<rss version="2.0" xmlns:jf="http://www.jivesoftware.com/xmlns/jiveforums/rss">



<channel>
    <title>Support Forums: Message List - The Semantic Web FAQ</title>
    <link>http://www.theserverside.com</link>
    <description>Most recent forum messages</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
        <generator>Jive Forums Silver 5.5.30 (www.jivesoftware.com)</generator>
    
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 17:46:48 -0400</pubDate>


    <item>

        <title>Re: But does the faq make RDF usable?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=43612</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>In another 5 years, W3C will still be pitching RDF and semantic web without making an ounce of significant progress.</blockquote>...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2007 11:00:10 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2007 11:00:10 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2007 11:00:10 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jan 4, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>The Ugly One With The Jewels</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>RuleInterchange format for the web</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=43612</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[What does RuleML do if it does not provide a Rule Interchange Format for the web?

Cheers

Steve T]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2007 10:35:37 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2007 10:35:37 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2007 10:35:37 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jan 4, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>SteveRT101</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: a long way gone and still not there</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=43612</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[I see a tendency to move away from OWL/RDF as the heart of the semantic services etc. but to see it as just a serialization form....]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2007 03:34:26 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2007 03:34:26 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2007 03:34:26 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jan 2, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>joost de vries</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: a long way gone and still not there</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=43612</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Andreas, What I meant was that OWL-DL has certain characteristics (monotonicity) that make it inherently unsuitable to logic programming (rule engines). ...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 25 Dec 2006 14:08:59 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 25 Dec 2006 14:08:59 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 25 Dec 2006 14:08:59 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Dec 25, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>peter lin</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: a long way gone and still not there</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=43612</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote><blockquote>OWL is an ontology right, so I don't think the spec itself addresses inferencing.</blockquote>...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Sun, 24 Dec 2006 11:13:55 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Sun, 24 Dec 2006 11:13:55 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Sun, 24 Dec 2006 11:13:55 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Dec 24, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>peter lin</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: a long way gone and still not there</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=43612</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Thanks Ugly; I had not heard of OWLIM.]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Sun, 24 Dec 2006 10:19:46 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Sun, 24 Dec 2006 10:19:46 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Sun, 24 Dec 2006 10:19:46 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Dec 24, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>joost de vries</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: a long way gone and still not there</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=43612</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Andreas, What I meant was that OWL-DL has certain characteristics (monotonicity) that make it inherently unsuitable to logic programming (rule engines). ...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Sun, 24 Dec 2006 10:18:51 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Sun, 24 Dec 2006 10:18:51 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Sun, 24 Dec 2006 10:18:51 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Dec 24, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>joost de vries</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>2</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: a long way gone and still not there</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=43612</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>OWL Semantics can be implemented in a RuleEngine. With other words: using a Ruleengine (like JBoss Rules or Jess) you can not only trigger funtions but you can also generate new facts (knowledge).</blockquote>...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Sun, 24 Dec 2006 07:50:59 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Sun, 24 Dec 2006 07:50:59 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Sun, 24 Dec 2006 07:50:59 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Dec 24, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>The Ugly One With The Jewels</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: a long way gone and still not there</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=43612</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>OWL is an ontology right, so I don't think the spec itself addresses inferencing.</blockquote>...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Sun, 24 Dec 2006 07:46:13 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Sun, 24 Dec 2006 07:46:13 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Sun, 24 Dec 2006 07:46:13 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Dec 24, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>The Ugly One With The Jewels</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: a long way gone and still not there</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=43612</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Andreas I agree with your scepticism. But OWL and rule engines are in a different problem space; OWL reasons about knowledge and generates knowledge not actions (side effects)....]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Sat, 23 Dec 2006 12:54:55 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Sat, 23 Dec 2006 12:54:55 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Sat, 23 Dec 2006 12:54:55 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Dec 23, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>peter lin</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>5</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: a long way gone and still not there</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=43612</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[hi joost...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Sat, 23 Dec 2006 06:27:55 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Sat, 23 Dec 2006 06:27:55 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Sat, 23 Dec 2006 06:27:55 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Dec 23, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Andreas Andreakis</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>2</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>a long way gone and still not there</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=43612</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Andreas I agree with your scepticism. But OWL and rule engines are in a different problem space; OWL reasons about knowledge and generates knowledge not actions (side effects)....]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Sat, 23 Dec 2006 04:46:30 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Sat, 23 Dec 2006 04:46:30 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Sat, 23 Dec 2006 04:46:30 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Dec 23, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>joost de vries</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>9</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>a long way to go</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=43612</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[I´ve worked on several semanticweb projects. According to my experience and observations, the semantic web is suffering because:...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Sat, 23 Dec 2006 04:20:27 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Sat, 23 Dec 2006 04:20:27 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Sat, 23 Dec 2006 04:20:27 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Dec 23, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Andreas Andreakis</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>11</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: But does the faq make RDF usable?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=43612</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[I could not comment on standards themselves but appliance of them seems to be practical enough to build really nice contextual navigation atop of full text search. I recently attended presentation of ORACLEs Secure Enterprise Search combined with Seamark...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 22 Dec 2006 13:22:07 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 22 Dec 2006 13:22:07 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 22 Dec 2006 13:22:07 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Dec 22, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Konstantin Ignatyev</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>But does the faq make RDF usable?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=43612</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[The faq is nice, but it doesn't solve the issues and problems with the current W3C approach to semantic web and RDF. It's still just as impractical and pointless as it was last year. I love the idea of a semantic web, but the specs coming out of W3C just...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 22 Dec 2006 11:07:31 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 22 Dec 2006 11:07:31 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 22 Dec 2006 11:07:31 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Dec 22, 2006</jf:date>
        <jf:author>peter lin</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>2</jf:replyCount>
    </item>



</channel>
</rss>

