<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>











<rss version="2.0" xmlns:jf="http://www.jivesoftware.com/xmlns/jiveforums/rss">



<channel>
    <title>Support Forums: Message List - Mule: A Case Study</title>
    <link>http://www.theserverside.com</link>
    <description>Most recent forum messages</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
        <generator>Jive Forums Silver 5.5.30 (www.jivesoftware.com)</generator>
    
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 00:59:55 -0400</pubDate>


    <item>

        <title>Adware</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=43851</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[I'm just concerned on the current move to adware/badgeware licenses by VC backed companies and the harm this may do to the Open Source eco-system and the Open Source brand. What concerns me more is how it's purposefully glossed over or not mentioned at...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 11:44:39 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 11:44:39 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 11:44:39 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Oct 25, 2009</jf:date>
        <jf:author>marlena21</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Mule Case Study Late question</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=43851</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Hi Eugene,...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 06:58:42 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 06:58:42 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 06:58:42 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Mar 19, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Sanne deRoever</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Real Open Source and forkability puts the end user in contro</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=43851</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>The biggest problem is that Open Source implies certain assurances that puts the end-user, not the vendor, in control. It is assurances like this that have accelerated the adoption of Open Source by end users. This success is also why...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 10:08:40 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 10:08:40 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 10:08:40 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jan 23, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Ross Mason</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Real Open Source and forkability puts the end user in control</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=43851</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[The biggest problem is that Open Source implies certain assurances that puts the end-user, not the vendor, in control. It is assurances like this that have accelerated the adoption of Open Source by end users. This success is also why commercial...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 19:28:38 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 19:28:38 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 19:28:38 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jan 22, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Mark Proctor</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: not OSI approved?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=43851</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Your point is if you can't rip off because of a license, it's not OSS? Try that with GPL.</blockquote>...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 17:00:07 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 17:00:07 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 17:00:07 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jan 19, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Cameron Purdy</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>2</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: not OSI approved?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=43851</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>and why would it be a "recommended read"? <br><br>Asay's note is utterly biased, because SugarCRM/Alfresco is in the same boat with Mule w.r.t. the MPL+attribution case<br><br>here is what I call a recommended read instead: <a...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 11:27:48 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 11:27:48 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 11:27:48 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jan 19, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Andrew Perepelytsya</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>3</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Silly license</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=43851</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[a) You don't allow trademarks to be used in any way, yet you demand that they be (ab)used all the time. ...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 07:55:36 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 07:55:36 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 07:55:36 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jan 19, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Dalibor Topic</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: not OSI approved?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=43851</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Matt on the subject (a recommended read) - <a href="http://weblog.infoworld.com/openresource/archives/2007/01/why_im_tired_of.html"...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 07:34:59 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 07:34:59 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 07:34:59 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jan 19, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>The Ugly One With The Jewels</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>4</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Subscriptions, not licenses</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=43851</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Just to clarify, what we sell is a support subscription. When you are a subscriber you get a license that allows you to use Mule in whatever way you want with no attribution. The open source license is the means by which the product is distributed. This...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 20:43:00 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 20:43:00 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 20:43:00 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jan 18, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Dave Rosenberg</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>About Intalio's Licensing Terms</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=43851</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Just for clarification, Intalio|BPMS Community Edition is licensed under the MPL+Attribution. Some components of the solution are available under Apache Software License (ASL) or Eclipse Public License (EPL). For example, our BPMN process modeler is...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 19:56:00 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 19:56:00 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 19:56:00 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jan 18, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Ismael Ghalimi</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>BPEL support</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=43851</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote><blockquote>Intalio's BPEL Engine is "free" if used on Redhat I believe</blockquote><br><br>Intalio has recently relicensed it's stuff and is also now MPL+Attribution.</blockquote>...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 17:48:52 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 17:48:52 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 17:48:52 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jan 18, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Paul Brown</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Licensing and OSS--not that scary</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=43851</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Thank you Dave for your response....]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 16:56:41 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 16:56:41 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 16:56:41 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jan 18, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Ken Carroll</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>2</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Then make a suggestion and stop complaining</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=43851</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[I do not care whether you use GPL, BSD or any number of other licenses.  I simply wish you would not advertise non open source software as open source....]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 16:27:55 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 16:27:55 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 16:27:55 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jan 18, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Andrew Oliver</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Then make a suggestion and stop complaining</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=43851</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[To sit here and complain for the sake of complaining doesn't "preserve the term "open source". If you really wanted to help you would offer something productive. You think that anyone using MPL+ should switch to GPL? Fine. You think it should be BSD?...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 16:17:40 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 16:17:40 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 16:17:40 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jan 18, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Dave Rosenberg</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Licensing and OSS--not that scary</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=43851</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote> You'll also note that we have offered to provide people with our commercial license at no  charge for their project or usage. In the time that you all wrote these comments you could have just emailed us for a license for your...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 15:30:35 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 15:30:35 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 15:30:35 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jan 18, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Andrew Oliver</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>2</jf:replyCount>
    </item>



</channel>
</rss>

