<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>











<rss version="2.0" xmlns:jf="http://www.jivesoftware.com/xmlns/jiveforums/rss">



<channel>
    <title>Support Forums: Message List - Enhydra Shark 2.0, open source workflow engine, released</title>
    <link>http://www.theserverside.com</link>
    <description>Most recent forum messages</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
        <generator>Jive Forums Silver 5.5.30 (www.jivesoftware.com)</generator>
    
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 19:23:12 -0400</pubDate>


    <item>

        <title>comparative evaluation of Enhydra Shark and other OS WFE</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=45632</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[The following report might be of interest for people interested in a comparison between Enhydra Shark, jBPM and openWFE:...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 25 Dec 2007 10:19:46 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 25 Dec 2007 10:19:46 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 25 Dec 2007 10:19:46 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Dec 25, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Marlon Dumas</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Enhydra Shark 2.0, open source workflow engine, released</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=45632</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Don't make me laugh - jBPM simply sucks comparing to FileNet Process Engine. Staring from the range of features and ending with horrible performance.]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2007 09:55:55 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2007 09:55:55 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2007 09:55:55 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Dec 1, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Yuri Khomich</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Coupling vs. Integration</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=45632</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Having worked with a variety of commercial &#38; open source BPM/Workflow engines for our solutions - it is pretty clear that maximum productivity is attained by decoupling the process &#38; content tiers. <br>It's the reason why FileNET...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2007 09:45:07 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2007 09:45:07 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2007 09:45:07 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Dec 1, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Yuri Khomich</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Enhydra Shark 2.0, open source workflow engine, released</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=45632</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Having worked with a variety of commercial &#38; open source BPM/Workflow engines for our solutions - it is pretty clear that maximum productivity is attained by decoupling the process &#38; content tiers. ...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Sat, 09 Jun 2007 15:38:59 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Sat, 09 Jun 2007 15:38:59 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Sat, 09 Jun 2007 15:38:59 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jun 9, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Zubin Wadia</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Enhydra Shark 2.0, open source workflow engine, released</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=45632</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote><blockquote>One more workflow engine? lol<br>What benifits it provides over other workflow, like JBPM, or OSworkflow.<br><br>sudhir<br><a href="http://www.jyog.com" target="_blank"><a href="http://www.jyog.com"...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2007 06:13:19 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2007 06:13:19 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2007 06:13:19 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jun 7, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>daringtakers</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Enhydra Shark 2.0, open source workflow engine, released</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=45632</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>JBPM and OSworkflow seems to be too much J2EE/SOAP oriented, while Shark can be used wherever you want</blockquote>...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Sun, 03 Jun 2007 18:13:19 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Sun, 03 Jun 2007 18:13:19 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Sun, 03 Jun 2007 18:13:19 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jun 3, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Tak Yoshida</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: XPDL Suitable for Defining Workflows???</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=45632</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>"The language that best fits a particular application is usually a custom workflow implementation just for that application since it will suit all of the requirements and not be any more complex that it needs to be.  The only true competitor...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Sat, 02 Jun 2007 05:28:49 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Sat, 02 Jun 2007 05:28:49 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Sat, 02 Jun 2007 05:28:49 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jun 2, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Miguel Valdes Faura</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Enhydra Shark 2.0, open source workflow engine, released</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=45632</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>One more workflow engine? lol<br>What benifits it provides over other workflow, like JBPM, or OSworkflow.<br><br>sudhir<br><a href="http://www.jyog.com" target="_blank">http://www.jyog.com</a></blockquote>...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2007 13:45:09 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2007 13:45:09 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2007 13:45:09 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jun 1, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Ilya Sterin</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: XPDL Suitable for Defining Workflows???</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=45632</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA["I'm more for using the language that better fit in each situation and even combine languages when addressing complex applications (i.e XPDL and BPEL can be used together in multiple uses cases)."...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2007 12:43:39 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2007 12:43:39 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2007 12:43:39 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jun 1, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Nicholaus Shupe</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Enhydra Shark 2.0, open source workflow engine, released</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=45632</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>One more workflow engine? lol<br>target="_blank"&gt;<a class="jive-link-external" href="http://www.jyog.com" target="_newWindow">http://www.jyog.com</a></a></blockquote>
As you can see by the "2.0", Shark is not a new workflow engine.]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2007 08:49:10 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2007 08:49:10 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2007 08:49:10 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jun 1, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Mark N</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Enhydra Shark 2.0, open source workflow engine, released</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=45632</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[What amazes me is the quality of experience in developing software is so vastly different between smaller bpm's like jbpm and shark and big bpm's stellent and filenet....]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2007 08:27:03 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2007 08:27:03 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2007 08:27:03 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jun 1, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>artful dodger</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>4</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Enhydra Shark 2.0, open source workflow engine, released</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=45632</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA["JBPM and OSworkflow seems to be too much J2EE/SOAP oriented, while Shark can be used wherever you want: J2SE app, embedded in webapps"

jBPM is totally decoupled from SOAP;it's just a jar.  You can place it in a webapp or a command line program.]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2007 08:03:49 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2007 08:03:49 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2007 08:03:49 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jun 1, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>artful dodger</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: XPDL Suitable for Defining Workflows???</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=45632</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Given this, and studies such as the one written up here: <br><br><a href="http://is.tm.tue.nl/research/patterns/download/ce-xpdl.v" target="_blank">http://is.tm.tue.nl/research/patterns/download/ce-xpdl.v</a><br><br>it seems as though XPDL...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2007 04:19:25 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2007 04:19:25 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2007 04:19:25 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jun 1, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Miguel Valdes Faura</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>2</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Enhydra Shark 2.0, open source workflow engine, released</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=45632</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>One more workflow engine? lol<br>What benifits it provides over other workflow, like JBPM, or OSworkflow.<br><br>sudhir<br><a href="http://www.jyog.com" target="_blank">http://www.jyog.com</a></blockquote>...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2007 03:25:34 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2007 03:25:34 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2007 03:25:34 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jun 1, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Guido Anzuoni</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>3</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: XPDL Suitable for Defining Workflows???</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=45632</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>As advertised Enhydra Shark is an XPDL implementation without proprietary extensions.  Given this, and studies such as the one written up here: <br><br><a href="http://is.tm.tue.nl/research/patterns/download/ce-xpdl.v"...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2007 03:18:26 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2007 03:18:26 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2007 03:18:26 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jun 1, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Tom Baeyens</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>



</channel>
</rss>

