<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>











<rss version="2.0" xmlns:jf="http://www.jivesoftware.com/xmlns/jiveforums/rss">



<channel>
    <title>Support Forums: Message List - Mythical Man-Month walkthrough, Chapter 1: The Tar Pit</title>
    <link>http://www.theserverside.com</link>
    <description>Most recent forum messages</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
        <generator>Jive Forums Silver 5.5.30 (www.jivesoftware.com)</generator>
    
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 04:26:14 -0400</pubDate>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Requirements tools</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=46925</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote><blockquote>How long ago was that? The reason I ask is that Word now (theoretically) supports XML including DocBook at least to some degree.</blockquote><br><br>Four or five years ago.  On a subsequent project I tried to switch to MS Word XML...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2007 09:32:37 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2007 09:32:37 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2007 09:32:37 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Sep 19, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>James Watson</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Requirements tools</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=46925</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>One of the challenges with requirements is that they really straddle the fence between true technical documentation and "business" oriented documentation.  A lot of the contents are heavily structured but also a lot are not.</blockquote>...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2007 14:21:04 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2007 14:21:04 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2007 14:21:04 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Sep 18, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>James Watson</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Mythical Man-Month walkthrough, Chapter 1: The Tar Pit</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=46925</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[The reason Brooks' book remains relevant because all of its core truths are about human beings and complexity, not about technology. Large organizations can accomplish bigger and more complex tasks than small ones but they are less efficient at a work...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2007 13:51:24 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2007 13:51:24 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2007 13:51:24 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Sep 18, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>William Childers</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Requirements tools</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=46925</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>How long ago was that? The reason I ask is that Word now (theoretically) supports XML including DocBook at least to some degree.</blockquote>...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2007 13:04:09 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2007 13:04:09 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2007 13:04:09 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Sep 18, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Erik Engbrecht</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>2</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Requirements tools</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=46925</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>The problem is the Word docs and PPTs are all necessary deliverables.  I thought I was being really clever once and used some XSLT to translate a Use Case Model into a big hyperlinked requirements document in HTML.  I liked it.  No one else...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2007 11:21:00 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2007 11:21:00 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2007 11:21:00 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Sep 18, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>James Watson</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>3</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Willful misreading?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=46925</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Complex problems have intrinsic "think time" - an observation consistent with the agile view of incremental and iterative progress based on continuous delivery of releases of useful working systems.</blockquote>...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2007 09:54:29 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2007 09:54:29 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2007 09:54:29 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Sep 18, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Erik Engbrecht</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Requirements tools</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=46925</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>The problem with requirements is often that they just get put into Word documents. WORD IS NOT A REQUIREMENTS TOOL! You need to be able to express dependencies, track and broadcast changes, and links or relations to other artifacts (like......]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2007 09:46:41 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2007 09:46:41 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2007 09:46:41 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Sep 18, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Erik Engbrecht</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>4</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Willful misreading?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=46925</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote><blockquote>Brooks Law - the maxim for which the book is most famous - states (more or less) that "adding more people to a late project makes it finish even later" is based on an understanding that communications overhead between members of a...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2007 07:32:49 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2007 07:32:49 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2007 07:32:49 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Sep 18, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>John Brand</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Willful misreading?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=46925</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Brooks Law - the maxim for which the book is most famous - states (more or less) that "adding more people to a late project makes it finish even later" is based on an understanding that communications overhead between members of a large team...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2007 06:13:24 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2007 06:13:24 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2007 06:13:24 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Sep 18, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Joseph Ottinger</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Requirements tools</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=46925</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[The problem with requirements is often that they just get put into Word documents. WORD IS NOT A REQUIREMENTS TOOL! You need to be able to express dependencies, track and broadcast changes, and links or relations to other artifacts (like... code!) in...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2007 04:17:16 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2007 04:17:16 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2007 04:17:16 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Sep 18, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Tor Iver Wilhelmsen</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>5</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Mythical Man-Month walkthrough, Chapter 1: The Tar Pit</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=46925</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>That's not funny.  The poor suckers that keep buy these products should be pitied, not mocked.</blockquote>...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2007 03:26:59 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2007 03:26:59 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2007 03:26:59 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Sep 18, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Karl Banke</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Willful misreading?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=46925</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Brooks Law - the maxim for which the book is most famous - states (more or less) that "adding more people to a late project makes it finish even later" is based on an understanding that communications overhead between members of a large team consumes too...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2007 02:21:39 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2007 02:21:39 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2007 02:21:39 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Sep 18, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Simon Sonter</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>3</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Mythical Man-Month walkthrough, Chapter 1: The Tar Pit</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=46925</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[I've been meaning to do a blog on The Tar Pit for a long time now.  Thanks for the inspiration to actually sit down and do it....]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 23:21:48 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 23:21:48 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 23:21:48 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Sep 17, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Erik Engbrecht</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Identifying Big Game</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=46925</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>The first chapter of The Mythical Man-Month is a throwing down of a glove: expressing the need for large teams, in comparison to the perceived effectiveness of small teams. Small teams can have great success with small projects, Brooks says,...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 18:14:04 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 18:14:04 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 18:14:04 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Sep 17, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Erik Engbrecht</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Indeed!</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=46925</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote><br>Very well said. IMHO, another interesting idiosyncrasy of requirements is the matryoshka effect: one requirement has a little other requirement enclosed within itself. That makes this new requirement invisible to the crew at the moment of...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 16:44:35 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 16:44:35 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 16:44:35 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Sep 17, 2007</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Bill Pyne</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>



</channel>
</rss>

