<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>











<rss version="2.0" xmlns:jf="http://www.jivesoftware.com/xmlns/jiveforums/rss">



<channel>
    <title>Support Forums: Message List - NIO not faster than IO, according to... TSS itself?</title>
    <link>http://www.theserverside.com</link>
    <description>Most recent forum messages</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
        <generator>Jive Forums Silver 5.5.30 (www.jivesoftware.com)</generator>
    
    <pubDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 08:36:14 -0400</pubDate>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Version</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=48449</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>It was JDK 1.4.2.</blockquote>

I have to wonder if using 1.6 would produce different test results.]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 14:36:06 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 14:36:06 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 14:36:06 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Feb 22, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Bill Pyne</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Version</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=48449</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote><br>If you don't mind my asking, what version of the JDK and JVM were used? My impression of Sun is that they don't worry about optimizing a first release but put a lot of effort into optimization afterward. NIO was introduced in 1.4 and...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 09:30:45 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 09:30:45 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 09:30:45 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Feb 22, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Amit Varudkar</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Erlang YAWS</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=48449</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>2) Is there any reason the JVM couldn't support the same massively concurrent threading as erlang?  Shouldn't we be getting close to an UBER VM that all languages can run on?</blockquote>...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 10:01:27 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 10:01:27 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 10:01:27 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Feb 21, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>James Watson</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Erlang YAWS</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=48449</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Actually, Erlang Yaws IS single-threaded (usually) and it also runs a thread per request :)<br><br>Erlang uses its own lightweight threads - like 'green threads' in old JDKs but even more lightweight. Thread creation in Erlang is an...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 01:58:34 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 01:58:34 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 01:58:34 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Feb 21, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Bill Burke</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>YAWS</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=48449</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>If YAWS is built on Erlang and Erlang in inherently able to run on multiple processors, it seems very strange to claim that YAWS is single-threaded.</blockquote>...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 18:08:52 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 18:08:52 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 18:08:52 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Feb 20, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Alex Besogonov</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: My experience seems to agree</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=48449</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>So NIO isn't slow, although for a single connection it may be marginally slower than blocking IO as a trade-off for its flexibility.</blockquote>...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 16:32:07 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 16:32:07 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 16:32:07 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Feb 20, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Maris Orbidans</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: My experience seems to agree</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=48449</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>why is NIO so slow then ?</blockquote>...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 15:15:37 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 15:15:37 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 15:15:37 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Feb 20, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Cameron Purdy</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Erlang YAWS</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=48449</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote><blockquote><blockquote><blockquote>My understanding is that Erlang was developed for running apps on machines with a large number of processors.<br></blockquote><br>No, not quite. Erlang was designed to support massively multithreaded...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 10:06:09 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 10:06:09 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 10:06:09 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Feb 20, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>James Watson</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Erlang YAWS</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=48449</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote><blockquote><blockquote>My understanding is that Erlang was developed for running apps on machines with a large number of processors.<br></blockquote><br>No, not quite. Erlang was designed to support massively multithreaded distributed...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 10:01:48 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 10:01:48 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 10:01:48 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Feb 20, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Mark Wutka</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>2</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Erlang YAWS</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=48449</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote><blockquote>My understanding is that Erlang was developed for running apps on machines with a large number of processors.<br></blockquote><br>No, not quite. Erlang was designed to support massively multithreaded distributed...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 09:39:42 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 09:39:42 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 09:39:42 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Feb 20, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>James Watson</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>3</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: My experience seems to agree</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=48449</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>We built a device emulation system to stress test a Telecom Lab Automation software (a weblogic based app). <br><br>Initially we used io for the emulation system and it was not responsing enough when Test automation software used to make...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 09:16:20 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 09:16:20 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 09:16:20 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Feb 20, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Bill Pyne</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>2</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: My experience seems to agree</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=48449</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[why is NIO so slow then ?]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 07:16:36 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 07:16:36 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 07:16:36 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Feb 20, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Maris Orbidans</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>2</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>My experience seems to agree</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=48449</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[We built a device emulation system to stress test a Telecom Lab Automation software (a weblogic based app). ...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 02:50:28 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 02:50:28 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 02:50:28 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Feb 20, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Amit Varudkar</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>6</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: hey guys, please excuse me</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=48449</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Excuse me. As I remember in an offical java document, they also rewrite the IO package based on the refactored NIO package. So....</blockquote>Interesting - but difficult to find. I looked at the JDK sources for 1.6, and found a lot of...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 02:03:34 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 02:03:34 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 02:03:34 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Feb 20, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Joseph Ottinger</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>hey guys, please excuse me</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=48449</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Excuse me. As I remember in an offical java document, they also rewrite the IO package based on the refactored NIO package. So....]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 00:15:38 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 00:15:38 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 00:15:38 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Feb 20, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>tony yin</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>



</channel>
</rss>

