<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>











<rss version="2.0" xmlns:jf="http://www.jivesoftware.com/xmlns/jiveforums/rss">



<channel>
    <title>Support Forums: Message List - New Article: New Features in EJB 3.1 - Part 4</title>
    <link>http://www.theserverside.com</link>
    <description>Most recent forum messages</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
        <generator>Jive Forums Silver 5.5.30 (www.jivesoftware.com)</generator>
    
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 09:11:31 -0400</pubDate>


    <item>

        <title>Re: New Article: New Features in EJB 3.1 - Part 4</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=49749</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Ara:...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 13:00:53 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 13:00:53 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 13:00:53 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jun 25, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Reza Rahman</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: New Article: New Features in EJB 3.1 - Part 4</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=49749</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>agree that DI is overkill for a set of simpler applications, but VM already supports a good number of technologies which are not used by a good set of applications.</blockquote>...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 07:13:21 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 07:13:21 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 07:13:21 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jun 25, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Ara Abrahamian</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: What's the purpose of the @Componant over the seam's @name</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=49749</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[I have the same concern myself. This is good feedback for the WebBeans EG...

Cheers,
Reza]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 09:54:10 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 09:54:10 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 09:54:10 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jun 23, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Reza Rahman</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Indeed</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=49749</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Ian:...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 09:50:07 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 09:50:07 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 09:50:07 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jun 23, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Reza Rahman</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Indeed</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=49749</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Arjan,...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 04:18:38 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 04:18:38 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 04:18:38 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jun 23, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Bruno Barin</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: What's the purpose of the @Componant over the seam's @name</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=49749</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>If not then why not merge the <b>@Componant</b> and the <b>@Named</b> annotions? ex. <b>@Componant(name="placeBid")</b> or better <b>@Componant("placebid")</b></blockquote>...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Sun, 22 Jun 2008 10:04:39 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Sun, 22 Jun 2008 10:04:39 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Sun, 22 Jun 2008 10:04:39 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jun 22, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>arjan tijms</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>What's the purpose of the @Componant over the seam's @name</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=49749</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Hi,...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Sun, 22 Jun 2008 08:17:14 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Sun, 22 Jun 2008 08:17:14 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Sun, 22 Jun 2008 08:17:14 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jun 22, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>zart colwin</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>2</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Indeed</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=49749</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Why not simply use the session bean as the backing bean, as Seam enables you to do?</blockquote>...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Sun, 22 Jun 2008 03:16:08 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Sun, 22 Jun 2008 03:16:08 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Sun, 22 Jun 2008 03:16:08 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jun 22, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>arjan tijms</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: New Article: New Features in EJB 3.1 - Part 4</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=49749</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Well, most of the concerns I see here are about breaking layers, the 3 tires architecture etc.....]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2008 20:08:57 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2008 20:08:57 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2008 20:08:57 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jun 21, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Daoud Abdelmonem Faleh</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Indeed</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=49749</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Arjan:<br><br><blockquote>For me it would be great if the relation could be 3-way. I.e. the entity bean's properties bound to my JSF UI components, the session bean injected with the entity bean and then the backing bean injected with the...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2008 14:54:22 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2008 14:54:22 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2008 14:54:22 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jun 21, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Ian Hlavats</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>2</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Indeed</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=49749</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Arjan:...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2008 10:53:56 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2008 10:53:56 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2008 10:53:56 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jun 21, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Reza Rahman</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>3</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Automatic EJB detection for webapps</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=49749</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Arjan:...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2008 10:48:17 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2008 10:48:17 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2008 10:48:17 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jun 21, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Reza Rahman</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Indeed</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=49749</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>But as I said most of time our backing beans acts as a "wrapper" to the EJB, performing the boring task to set all attributes to an entity bean.</blockquote>...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2008 08:05:51 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2008 08:05:51 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2008 08:05:51 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jun 21, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>arjan tijms</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>5</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Automatic EJB detection for webapps</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=49749</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>As to the ejb-link ref stuff you mentioned, this will essentially go away once JNDI names are standardized (both local and remote EJBs will have deterministic names that do not need to be explicitly mapped). I agree leaving this up to vendors...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2008 07:38:58 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2008 07:38:58 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2008 07:38:58 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jun 21, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>arjan tijms</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>MathUtil.round() is static</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=49749</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Why even use @In private MathUtil mathUtil;? 

MailUtil.round(double, double) is static.  It seems pointless to me to make a instance of the class.

Or am I missing something? So I agree with Mohammad that this example is indeed over engineered.]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2008 06:29:29 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2008 06:29:29 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2008 06:29:29 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jun 21, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Paul Johe</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>



</channel>
</rss>

