<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>











<rss version="2.0" xmlns:jf="http://www.jivesoftware.com/xmlns/jiveforums/rss">



<channel>
    <title>Support Forums: Message List - Performance tests of open source JMS</title>
    <link>http://www.theserverside.com</link>
    <description>Most recent forum messages</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
        <generator>Jive Forums Silver 5.5.30 (www.jivesoftware.com)</generator>
    
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 03:36:31 -0400</pubDate>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Performance tests of open source JMS</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=50127</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Hi There,...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 00:43:27 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 00:43:27 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 00:43:27 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Apr 21, 2009</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Seshu Srilakshmi Ganugapati</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>wrong title</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=50127</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[If you put title as "open source JMS" but did not include "ActiveMQ", it is hard to convince people. :-)]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 14:10:01 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 14:10:01 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 14:10:01 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jul 30, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Hank Li</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Performance tests of open source JMS</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=50127</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[One thing I think is missing is the reliability factor. We’ve used JBossMQ for a number of years to handle emails in a reliable way, but periodically JBossMQ will choke and stop handling messages. I’m currently using ActiveMQ which has proven to be much...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 10:43:12 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 10:43:12 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 10:43:12 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jul 28, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Steven Goldsmith</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Performance tests of open source JMS</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=50127</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Most application servers provide a way to plug in a different JMS implementation, what this series of tests is supposed to be doing is demonstrating that developers may want to think about the JMS implementation that they use in the same way that they...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 10:25:43 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 10:25:43 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 10:25:43 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jul 28, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Matt Brasier</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Performance tests of open source JMS</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=50127</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[This particular performance test isn't at all a realistic indicator of anything in my opinion.  In fact, having worked for a JMS vendor in the past, out of the box configurations tend to favour raw tests such as these and are of little or no value to...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 08:15:31 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 08:15:31 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 08:15:31 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jul 28, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Louis Polycarpou</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: RDB is popular and reliable, JMS not.</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=50127</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[I'm afraid so....]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 12:22:58 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 12:22:58 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 12:22:58 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jul 25, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Takashi YAMAGUCHI</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Performance tests of open source JMS</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=50127</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>The main result for people that care about their messages is:<br><br>When overloaded with messages, JBoss MQ and JBoss messaging suffered failures that brought the whole application server down.</blockquote>...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 10:02:03 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 10:02:03 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 10:02:03 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jul 24, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Adrian Brock</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: RDB is popular and reliable, JMS not.</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=50127</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>You are right. I wish it should be. But wrong.<br>Let me get this explained.<br>ActiveMQ uses HOWL ( the open source transaction log ). ...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 09:42:14 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 09:42:14 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 09:42:14 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jul 24, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Hiram Chirino</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Performance tests of open source JMS</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=50127</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[The main result for people that care about their messages is:...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 09:08:26 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 09:08:26 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 09:08:26 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jul 24, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Alexander Panzhin</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Close, but what are you trying to show?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=50127</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[About the only test performed with some weight to it was the timing of creating the initial connections.  ...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 08:59:34 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 08:59:34 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 08:59:34 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jul 24, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>paul Allen</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: RDB is popular and reliable, JMS not.</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=50127</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Hi Takashi-...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 08:31:17 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 08:31:17 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 08:31:17 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jul 24, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Tim Fox</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: RDB is popular and reliable, JMS not.</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=50127</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[You are right. I wish it should be. But wrong....]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 22:15:27 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 22:15:27 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 22:15:27 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jul 23, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Takashi YAMAGUCHI</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>2</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Performance tests of open source JMS</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=50127</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Benchmarking performance in terms of time/message is not as useful or interesting as measuring the total message throughput per second, as in the JBM tests.  I also thought the different configurations shown in the JBM tests are informative (I'm guessing...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 19:57:41 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 19:57:41 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 19:57:41 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jul 23, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Bradley Schaefer</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>WTF?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=50127</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Even if all JMS implementions did use RDB internally there's no reason to go an re-implement what JMS gives you for free. Stuff like pub/sub, message listeners and guaranteed once only messaging. Not to mention compatability with other java apps (or even...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 18:50:05 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 18:50:05 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 18:50:05 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jul 23, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Steve Cresswell</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Re: Performance tests of open source JMS</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=50127</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>William-<br><br>Unfortunately you can't often publish performance results against proprietary messaging products, since it's often prohibited in their licence agreements.</blockquote>...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 16:18:47 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 16:18:47 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 16:18:47 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Jul 23, 2008</jf:date>
        <jf:author>William Childers</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>



</channel>
</rss>

