Support Forums: Message List - OSGi and future directions for Enterprise Java http://www.theserverside.com Most recent forum messages en Jive Forums Silver 5.5.30 (www.jivesoftware.com) Thu, 20 Jun 2013 02:45:06 -0400 Re: OSGi jars vs. (?) Maven2 http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=53803 But aren't OSGi implementation too dependent on java.util.jar.JarFile.getManifest() method? I've looked at Felix code. It would be required to deploy two JARs into "bundles" directory of an OSGi container - one with implementation and one...]]> Sat, 04 Apr 2009 16:45:03 -0400 Sat, 04 Apr 2009 16:45:03 -0400 Sat, 04 Apr 2009 16:45:03 -0400 Apr 4, 2009 enewc 0 Re: OSGi jars vs. (?) Maven2 http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=53803
...but you can't go cracking open all existing JARs and repackaging them. That is just an untenable path forward.
That's what I'm thinking of... OSGi metadata should be external, as it's "higher level" of...]]> Wed, 18 Mar 2009 03:06:00 -0400 Wed, 18 Mar 2009 03:06:00 -0400 Wed, 18 Mar 2009 03:06:00 -0400 Mar 18, 2009 Grzegorz Grzybek 1 Re: OSGi jars vs. (?) Maven2 http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=53803
...but you can't go cracking open all existing JARs and repackaging them. That is just an untenable path forward.
That's what I'm thinking of... OSGi metadata should be external, as it's "higher level" of organization...]]> Fri, 13 Mar 2009 17:16:40 -0400 Fri, 13 Mar 2009 17:16:40 -0400 Fri, 13 Mar 2009 17:16:40 -0400 Mar 13, 2009 enewc 2 Re: OSGi and future directions for Enterprise Java http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=53803 People who started using the OSGi programming model for enterprise applications approached the Alliance to suggest the enterprise edition, not the other way around as you imply. If people weren't already using the OSGi APIs successfully in...]]> Sun, 01 Mar 2009 05:22:20 -0500 Sun, 01 Mar 2009 05:22:20 -0500 Sun, 01 Mar 2009 05:22:20 -0500 Mar 1, 2009 Alessandro Mottadelli 0 Re: OSGi and future directions for Enterprise Java http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=53803 Its the way OSGi proponents are trying to push OSGi APIs into application code that really disturbs me.
...]]> Sat, 28 Feb 2009 11:11:49 -0500 Sat, 28 Feb 2009 11:11:49 -0500 Sat, 28 Feb 2009 11:11:49 -0500 Feb 28, 2009 enewc 1 Re: OSGi and future directions for Enterprise Java http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=53803 Dear Chief Thrall,

Lately everybody feels free to take liberty to bash on Sun/JCP ..


You're sounding very defensive.

Sun acted extremely Microsoft-like when it came time to consider how to...]]> Fri, 27 Feb 2009 19:59:58 -0500 Fri, 27 Feb 2009 19:59:58 -0500 Fri, 27 Feb 2009 19:59:58 -0500 Feb 27, 2009 Bill Burke 2 Glassfish uses OSGI http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=53803 Thu, 26 Feb 2009 15:08:24 -0500 Thu, 26 Feb 2009 15:08:24 -0500 Thu, 26 Feb 2009 15:08:24 -0500 Feb 26, 2009 Ivica Loncar 0 Re: OSGi and future directions for Enterprise Java http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=53803 I assume that is the behavior that you are defending?...]]> Thu, 26 Feb 2009 14:06:34 -0500 Thu, 26 Feb 2009 14:06:34 -0500 Thu, 26 Feb 2009 14:06:34 -0500 Feb 26, 2009 Chief Thrall 1 Re: OSGi and future directions for Enterprise Java http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=53803 Thu, 26 Feb 2009 10:11:50 -0500 Thu, 26 Feb 2009 10:11:50 -0500 Thu, 26 Feb 2009 10:11:50 -0500 Feb 26, 2009 Cameron Purdy 5 Re: OSGi jars vs. Sigil(?) http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=53803 I think there are two issues with this approach which really cause headaches going forward; Module vs API dependencies and complex "Uses" graphs.This is true. I've started this topic from the side of Maven2 (and mess in its...]]> Thu, 26 Feb 2009 06:16:27 -0500 Thu, 26 Feb 2009 06:16:27 -0500 Thu, 26 Feb 2009 06:16:27 -0500 Feb 26, 2009 Grzegorz Grzybek 0 Re: OSGi jars vs. Sigil(?) http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=53803
...but you can't go cracking open all existing JARs and repackaging them. That is just an untenable path forward.
That's what I'm thinking of... OSGi metadata should be external, as it's "higher level" of organization...]]> Thu, 26 Feb 2009 05:41:08 -0500 Thu, 26 Feb 2009 05:41:08 -0500 Thu, 26 Feb 2009 05:41:08 -0500 Feb 26, 2009 Dave Savage 1 Re: OSGi and future directions for Enterprise Java http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=53803 there is feeling in the air that OSGi movement is little to pushy, so to speak...]]> Thu, 26 Feb 2009 05:29:29 -0500 Thu, 26 Feb 2009 05:29:29 -0500 Thu, 26 Feb 2009 05:29:29 -0500 Feb 26, 2009 Alessandro Mottadelli 0 Re: OSGi jars vs. (?) Maven2 http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=53803 ...but you can't go cracking open all existing JARs and repackaging them. That is just an untenable path forward.That's what I'm thinking of... OSGi metadata should be external, as it's "higher level" of organization - similar to...]]> Thu, 26 Feb 2009 01:53:58 -0500 Thu, 26 Feb 2009 01:53:58 -0500 Thu, 26 Feb 2009 01:53:58 -0500 Feb 26, 2009 Grzegorz Grzybek 5 Re: OSGi jars vs. (?) Maven2 http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=53803 Wed, 25 Feb 2009 18:38:54 -0500 Wed, 25 Feb 2009 18:38:54 -0500 Wed, 25 Feb 2009 18:38:54 -0500 Feb 25, 2009 enewc 0 Re: OSGi jars vs. (?) Maven2 http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=53803 Wed, 25 Feb 2009 13:46:23 -0500 Wed, 25 Feb 2009 13:46:23 -0500 Wed, 25 Feb 2009 13:46:23 -0500 Feb 25, 2009 Jason van Zyl 7