Support Forums: Message List - Comparing the Java Serialization Options

Fun games

Thu, 10 Jun 2010 02:35:24 -0400

I should mention that is compares "benchmarks for protobuf, thrift, java, scala, few implementations of stax, binaryxml, json, xstream, javolution, hessian, air jordan avro, sbinary and JSON...

A faster protobuf implemenation.

Fri, 18 Sep 2009 21:49:25 -0400

For those of you looking for a faster and easier to use protobuf implementation, you might want to check out this blog post....

Re: Everyone reading this should probably look at this...

Wed, 16 Sep 2009 20:22:42 -0400

http://code.google.com/p/thrift-protobuf-compare/wiki/Benchmarking

...

Everyone reading this should probably look at this...

Wed, 16 Sep 2009 20:19:11 -0400

http://code.google.com/p/thrift-protobuf-compare/wiki/Benchmarking

Re: Unfair

Wed, 16 Sep 2009 10:16:33 -0400

Would you still say it was relatively (comparatively) slow if the numbers excluded a number of factors including most importantly a baseline. Should you b compared X with Y or X - Z with Y - Z. What is Z? .....

Re: The Serialization Options

Wed, 16 Sep 2009 05:24:43 -0400

Hmm. It's Hessian 2, but there's a good deal of extra overhead using it that way. Interesting. I should be able to improve that performance.

Re: The Serialization Options

Wed, 16 Sep 2009 05:03:21 -0400

Those hessian numbers don't look right. Is that using Hessian 1 or Hessian 2? There's a big improvement for Hessian 2 both in performance and in serialization size.

Re: Unfair

Wed, 16 Sep 2009 03:22:43 -0400

This is just unfair. Google' lib requires you to define the type structure manually upfront... With that "convenience" I'm really surprised how actually slow Google's implementation is.

...

Correction to previous post

Tue, 15 Sep 2009 23:10:54 -0400

Nikita: Yes, the process complexity is there with Protocol Bufferes. I think it can be circumvented with some tooling. What I am thinking is Annotated Pojos that gives hints to a code generator ro create and compile .proto files.

The Serialization Options

Tue, 15 Sep 2009 23:07:45 -0400

Ashwin : There are some subtle differences between the two....

Re: Missing link to blog post

Tue, 15 Sep 2009 16:15:28 -0400

This one seems more complete - http://code.google.com/p/thrift-protobuf-compare/wiki/Benchmarking Ashwin.

Missing link to blog post

Tue, 15 Sep 2009 14:14:39 -0400

Here is the missing link: http://whiteboardjunkie.wordpress.com/2009/09/14/serialization-options-compared/

Re: Unfair

Tue, 15 Sep 2009 13:37:29 -0400

Maybe because it is not measuring what it should really be measuring. William

Unfair

Tue, 15 Sep 2009 12:23:16 -0400

This is just unfair. Google' lib requires you to define the type structure manually upfront... With that "convenience" I'm really surprised how actually slow Google's implementation is. ...

Re: Comparing the Java Serialization Options

Tue, 15 Sep 2009 10:58:00 -0400

XStream?