Magnolia is the first open-source content-management-system (CMS) which adheres to the upcoming standard of Java content repositories (JCR).
Its main goal is ease of use for all parties involved in running a CMS. It features a very flexible structure, platform-independence through the use of Java and XML, a simple to use API, easy templating through the use of JSP, JSTL and a custom tag library, automatic administrative UI generation, transparent and uniform data access to multiple data repositories, easy configuration through XML, easy application integration and easy deployment with professional staging on any J2EE Server.
Magnolia is actively been developed by obinary ltd. and is available free of charge as an open source product. We provide a binary download based on tomcat for easy deployment on Mac OS X, Windows, Linux, Solaris.
Read more on Magnolia CMS: http://www.magnolia.info
-
Magnolia Content Management Version 1.0 (31 messages)
- Posted by: Pascal Mangold
- Posted on: November 30 2003 17:24 EST
Threaded Messages (31)
- Source Code by Nadim Bitar on December 01 2003 15:45 EST
- Here's the download by Brad Madigan on December 01 2003 17:55 EST
-
Here's the download by Nadim Bitar on December 01 2003 08:17 EST
-
Here's the download by Hu Guohua on December 02 2003 05:50 EST
- That's "life" by Irakli Nadareishvili on December 02 2003 06:35 EST
-
Here's the download by Hu Guohua on December 02 2003 05:50 EST
- Screenhots not loading by Pascal Mangold on December 02 2003 08:10 EST
-
Here's the download by Nadim Bitar on December 01 2003 08:17 EST
- Here's the download by Brad Madigan on December 01 2003 17:55 EST
- What is the authoring URL? by Hunte Swee on December 01 2003 21:44 EST
- What is the authoring URL? by Frank Bolander on December 01 2003 22:51 EST
-
8081? Couldn't be connected by Hunte Swee on December 02 2003 08:34 EST
- Sorry, 8081 is up now. by Hunte Swee on December 02 2003 08:42 EST
-
8081? Couldn't be connected by Hunte Swee on December 02 2003 08:34 EST
- What is the authoring URL? by Frank Bolander on December 01 2003 22:51 EST
- Magnolia Content Management Version 1.0 by Carlos Perez on December 02 2003 09:39 EST
- Search by Pascal Mangold on December 02 2003 13:26 EST
-
Search by Carlos Perez on December 02 2003 01:51 EST
-
Search by Pascal Mangold on December 02 2003 04:38 EST
-
When will you release the source code? by Olli P?yry on December 03 2003 03:06 EST
-
What is used as repository by Guido Casper on December 03 2003 03:41 EST
-
What is used as repository by Pascal Mangold on December 03 2003 05:25 EST
-
What is used as repository by Guido Casper on December 03 2003 07:16 EST
-
What is used as repository by Pascal Mangold on December 03 2003 11:45 EST
- What is used as repository by Pascal Mangold on December 03 2003 11:49 EST
-
What is used as repository by Pascal Mangold on December 03 2003 11:45 EST
-
What is used as repository by Guido Casper on December 03 2003 07:16 EST
-
What is used as repository by Pascal Mangold on December 03 2003 05:25 EST
-
When will you release the source code? by Pascal Mangold on December 03 2003 05:26 EST
- When will you release the source code? by beagle boy on December 04 2003 07:36 EST
-
What is used as repository by Guido Casper on December 03 2003 03:41 EST
-
When will you release the source code? by Olli P?yry on December 03 2003 03:06 EST
-
Search by Pascal Mangold on December 02 2003 04:38 EST
- Search by beagle boy on December 04 2003 07:29 EST
-
Search by Carlos Perez on December 02 2003 01:51 EST
- Search by Pascal Mangold on December 02 2003 13:26 EST
- JCR Information by Markus Blumrich on December 03 2003 18:35 EST
- JCR Information by Pascal Mangold on December 04 2003 03:49 EST
- open source???? by beagle boy on December 04 2003 08:43 EST
- I think you got something wrong by marcel salathe on December 05 2003 13:37 EST
- is this the open source edition of Day 's Communique? by beagle boy on December 04 2003 10:05 EST
- source code available by Pascal Mangold on December 04 2003 16:33 EST
- This only tells that you seem to have a problem.... by marcel salathe on December 05 2003 13:22 EST
- Content management and web services by Seshagiri Varanasi on February 20 2004 18:26 EST
-
Source Code[ Go to top ]
- Posted by: Nadim Bitar
- Posted on: December 01 2003 15:45 EST
- in response to Pascal Mangold
Where is the source code? -
Here's the download[ Go to top ]
- Posted by: Brad Madigan
- Posted on: December 01 2003 17:55 EST
- in response to Nadim Bitar
http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=86297
I'm just wandering why all the images (most inline) are broken on their site. I can't even view the screenshots. -
Here's the download[ Go to top ]
- Posted by: Nadim Bitar
- Posted on: December 01 2003 20:17 EST
- in response to Brad Madigan
This link is only for binary downloads. -
Here's the download[ Go to top ]
- Posted by: Hu Guohua
- Posted on: December 02 2003 05:50 EST
- in response to Nadim Bitar
This link is only for binary downloads.
I want to know source link too! -
That's "life"[ Go to top ]
- Posted by: Irakli Nadareishvili
- Posted on: December 02 2003 06:35 EST
- in response to Hu Guohua
Open-source software without a source distribution, is not that a license violation? -
Screenhots not loading[ Go to top ]
- Posted by: Pascal Mangold
- Posted on: December 02 2003 08:10 EST
- in response to Brad Madigan
Caching was switch off due to a minor bug in magnolia and the server was quite busy the last 24 Hours :-) -
What is the authoring URL?[ Go to top ]
- Posted by: Hunte Swee
- Posted on: December 01 2003 21:44 EST
- in response to Pascal Mangold
I can't find the authoring URL, any one could tell me? -
What is the authoring URL?[ Go to top ]
- Posted by: Frank Bolander
- Posted on: December 01 2003 22:51 EST
- in response to Hunte Swee
Default is on port 8081. superuser/superuser is the user/password.
- Frank -
8081? Couldn't be connected[ Go to top ]
- Posted by: Hunte Swee
- Posted on: December 02 2003 20:34 EST
- in response to Frank Bolander
It seems that port 8081 is not on listening. -
Sorry, 8081 is up now.[ Go to top ]
- Posted by: Hunte Swee
- Posted on: December 02 2003 20:42 EST
- in response to Hunte Swee
Because I launched run the catalina.bat from a incorrect place.
Thanks. -
Magnolia Content Management Version 1.0[ Go to top ]
- Posted by: Carlos Perez
- Posted on: December 02 2003 09:39 EST
- in response to Pascal Mangold
Well all the features stated are nice and dandy, but what about SEARCH?
Is that supported and what kind of searches?
I'm wondering because all the demo sites that I saw didn't have a way to search.
Carlos -
Search[ Go to top ]
- Posted by: Pascal Mangold
- Posted on: December 02 2003 13:26 EST
- in response to Carlos Perez
Search will be implemented in JCR. Magnolia will incorporate search in the next major build e.g 1.5 or 2.0. In the meantime Luceen from apache.org can easy be integrated. -
Search[ Go to top ]
- Posted by: Carlos Perez
- Posted on: December 02 2003 13:51 EST
- in response to Pascal Mangold
Oh just great!
I do admire the clean look you've achieved with the apps you built but c'mon. That's an essential requirement!
Isn't this a content management system? How in the world do you manage content if you can't find it?! -
Search[ Go to top ]
- Posted by: Pascal Mangold
- Posted on: December 02 2003 16:38 EST
- in response to Carlos Perez
You can implement it in JCR on your own as soon as we release the sourc-code.
And by the way - it's version 1.0 :-) -
When will you release the source code?[ Go to top ]
- Posted by: Olli P?yry
- Posted on: December 03 2003 03:06 EST
- in response to Pascal Mangold
And when will that be - "as soon as we release the sourc-code"?
On http://www.obinary.com/en/magnolia.html you have: "You can download and use Magnolia including the source code"
As the source code is apparently not yet released, please update your WWW page accordingly, thank you.
Olli -
What is used as repository[ Go to top ]
- Posted by: Guido Casper
- Posted on: December 03 2003 03:41 EST
- in response to Olli P?yry
On http://www.obinary.com/en/magnolia.html it says:
Magnolia is written in Java and uses the upcoming standard API for Java-based content repositories (JCR) to access its content.
Does that means it _implements_ the API or it uses the API to access another repository implementing it? If the latter I'm curious what that repository actually is.
Thanks
Guido -
What is used as repository[ Go to top ]
- Posted by: Pascal Mangold
- Posted on: December 03 2003 05:25 EST
- in response to Guido Casper
We use the open-source implementation which is 0.7 -
What is used as repository[ Go to top ]
- Posted by: Guido Casper
- Posted on: December 03 2003 07:16 EST
- in response to Pascal Mangold
We use the open-source implementation which is 0.7
Which open-source implementation?
Sorry for my ignorance, but I'm not aware of one.
Guido -
What is used as repository[ Go to top ]
- Posted by: Pascal Mangold
- Posted on: December 03 2003 11:45 EST
- in response to Guido Casper
inside slide/apache.org
-Pascal -
What is used as repository[ Go to top ]
- Posted by: Pascal Mangold
- Posted on: December 03 2003 11:49 EST
- in response to Pascal Mangold
look at http://www.magnolia.info/redirects/magnolia-dev-archive.html
you find there a lot of your questions :-)
or simply subscribe to
magnolia-dev-subscribe at obinary dot com
or
magnolia-news-subscribe at obinary dot com
-p -
When will you release the source code?[ Go to top ]
- Posted by: Pascal Mangold
- Posted on: December 03 2003 05:26 EST
- in response to Olli P?yry
We see january as a release date now. We have to clean out some things before we can release -
When will you release the source code?[ Go to top ]
- Posted by: beagle boy
- Posted on: December 04 2003 07:36 EST
- in response to Pascal Mangold
We see january as a release date now. We have to clean out
> some things before we can release
do you have to *clean out* the design and other stuff that you
copied from day's communique product? i suggest you do that
if you want to avoid legal issues. -
Search[ Go to top ]
- Posted by: beagle boy
- Posted on: December 04 2003 07:29 EST
- in response to Pascal Mangold
Search will be implemented in JCR.
for a start, JCR is an api, i.e. it doesn't *implement* anything.
> In the meantime Luceen from apache.org can easy be integrated.
i doubt that. i wonder who you would accomplish that *easily*
(integrating luceen in magnolia). furthermore, who can you do
that as your *open source* project doesn't provide any source code :(( -
JCR Information[ Go to top ]
- Posted by: Markus Blumrich
- Posted on: December 03 2003 18:35 EST
- in response to Pascal Mangold
I can't seem to find a copy of the JSR-170 - Java Content Repositories, though the original schedule appears to indicate it was to be released by now.
Is there any publicly available details on this spec? BTW - BEA also claims to be 170 compatible:
http://www.bea.com/content/news_events/white_papers/BEA_WL_Portal_81_ds.pdf
bottom of page 5 under "Standards"
It would be nice to see the details of this spec.
thanks,
Markus -
JCR Information[ Go to top ]
- Posted by: Pascal Mangold
- Posted on: December 04 2003 03:49 EST
- in response to Markus Blumrich
You can't find em because they are still closed and not under public review yet.
http://www.jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=170
look at the schedule. -
open source????[ Go to top ]
- Posted by: beagle boy
- Posted on: December 04 2003 08:43 EST
- in response to Pascal Mangold
you guys publicly claim to be an open source project and
being commited to open source development.
how come that the source code can't be downloaded anywhere?
not very *open*, your source, isn't it?
you claim to be to 1st jcr compliant cms out there...
strange, i can't find your name in the jsr170 eg list.
you're neither a jcp member, so you don't participate
in the community review. now tell me, how can you
be compliant with something that you can't possibly
know?
you claim to be using code from the jakarta slide cvs. i checked
the archives and i couldn't find any active participation
of obinary staff. you're waiting for the slide open source
community to deliver a product/implementation which you can
readily use but you're not contributing in any way???
this is very shady, this stinks!
--
bb
ps: are you using magnolia for your own site (www.obinary.com)?
well, how about implementing proper image handling?
broken images don't look too good on the website of a cms vendor ;) -
I think you got something wrong[ Go to top ]
- Posted by: marcel salathe
- Posted on: December 05 2003 13:37 EST
- in response to beagle boy
To be compliant with something doesn't mean to have contributed to it. Millions of people are using open source products and not contributing in any way. But indeed, obinary is contributing a lot. Just download Magnolia and use it for free; also look at the source code: http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=86297.
The only thing that stinks here is your posts. The way you talk and your email adress (swiss extension) makes me think that you are working for a swiss company developing their own CMS. So please, go back to constructive argueing. You have the know-how, so rather share it than complain about it.
I will not reply to any of your messages in this thread as long as they are anonymous and non-constructive. -
is this the open source edition of Day 's Communique?[ Go to top ]
- Posted by: beagle boy
- Posted on: December 04 2003 10:05 EST
- in response to Pascal Mangold
when i look at magnolia's documentation i get the
impression that magnolia is somehow *VERY* similar
to Day's Communique product.
check out the following link:
http://www.day.com/content/en/product/productline.html
- anybody who has worked with day's communique products will
have an instant deja vue experience when browsing through
magnolia's javadoc:
is the following terminology/list of classnames ringing a bell?
- Atom
- ContainerList
- HierarchyManager
- Page
- actpage
- author
- publish
- activation
etc etc etc
the similarity is striking; no other cms uses this exact terminology
(Atom, ContainerList, HierarchyManager, Page, actpage et al)
- this comes as no surprise neither as at least 3 former day developers
are answering questions in obinary's magnolia-dev list!?!?
interesting, isn't it?
i guess this is the classical case of somebody copying a design
they didn't fully understand (just as in the case of m$dos and unix ;)
i would be *concerned* about legal issues too. maybe that's the reason
why they don't provide the supposedly *open* source, because they need to
*clean out some things before we can release" (as pascal from obinary put
it nicely;)
--
bb
ps: i posted my concerns also on the magnolia-dev list.
i didn't get a reply, neither appeared my posts in the list...
does this tell you anything? -
source code available[ Go to top ]
- Posted by: Pascal Mangold
- Posted on: December 04 2003 16:33 EST
- in response to beagle boy
sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=86297
look at sourceforge or freshmeat by tomorrow 2400 CET -
This only tells that you seem to have a problem....[ Go to top ]
- Posted by: marcel salathe
- Posted on: December 05 2003 13:22 EST
- in response to beagle boy
Well, beagle boy, what's your problem here? You're not raising one single functional issue here, you're simply complaining about the fact that Magnolia looks a bit like Day's Communique. Guess what, smarty, that's no secret! And there are many reasons.
1. I would always name a class "author" when it is representing author. I guess Day was not the first one to do that. The same goes for other classes.
2. What's so interesting about the fact that 3 Developers have worked with Day? That means that there's a lot of expertise in the company.
3. Now that the source code is released, I hope you get back to more constructive critics.
Maybe the reason why your post wasnt published on the magnolia-dev list is because the magnolia-dev list is a list where development issues are discussed, and not personal problems. -
Content management and web services[ Go to top ]
- Posted by: Seshagiri Varanasi
- Posted on: February 20 2004 18:26 EST
- in response to Pascal Mangold
Hi all,
can content management be implemented as an web service?
if so how can it be done/?
Thanks in anticipation,
Seshu