<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>











<rss version="2.0" xmlns:jf="http://www.jivesoftware.com/xmlns/jiveforums/rss">



<channel>
    <title>Support Forums: Message List - Article: Building Rich Internet Applications with Naked Objects</title>
    <link>http://www.theserverside.com</link>
    <description>Most recent forum messages</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
        <generator>Jive Forums Silver 5.5.30 (www.jivesoftware.com)</generator>
    
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 01:27:16 -0400</pubDate>


    <item>

        <title>Fundamental Problems with auto-generated GUIs</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=24401</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Ooh... an error with my previous reply:<blockquote>... Generated GUI will not solve all UI needs. However it is not say non-GUI should be generated, espcially with the primitive UI generator shown in this article. ...</blockquote>I mean: Generated GUI...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 26 May 2004 06:56:19 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 26 May 2004 06:56:19 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 26 May 2004 06:56:19 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>May 26, 2004</jf:date>
        <jf:author>hacking bear</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Fundamental Problems with auto-generated GUIs</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=24401</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[I agree with this opinion. Generated GUI will not solve all UI needs. However it is not say non-GUI should be generated, espcially with the primitive UI generator shown in this article. A powerful GUI generator will indeed solve many UI problems, just...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 26 May 2004 06:51:48 -0400</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 26 May 2004 06:51:48 -0400</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 26 May 2004 06:51:48 -0400</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>May 26, 2004</jf:date>
        <jf:author>hacking bear</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>experience of mapping nakedobjects to existing database schema ?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=24401</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Can I recommend that for a specific query about experience of using Naked Objects you might like to post it onto the Naked Objects newsgroup, which you can access from nakedobjects.org   I know that there are people on that newsgroup who have done what...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2004 13:52:21 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2004 13:52:21 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2004 13:52:21 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Mar 13, 2004</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Richard Pawson</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>experience of mapping nakedobjects to existing database schema ?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=24401</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[I understand that NakedObjects will create a database design from an object design but what if you can't throw away your existing database schema because applications are already using it ?<br>...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2004 07:18:50 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2004 07:18:50 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2004 07:18:50 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Mar 13, 2004</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Richard Sullivan</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>The framework does support multiple visual representations</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=24401</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[You seem to be very wedded to the belief that customised UIs are always going to be necessary.  You don't like the fact that with Naked Objects you need to add a single word 'action' to a method in order for it to be auomatically rendered visible to the...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2004 04:03:40 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2004 04:03:40 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2004 04:03:40 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Mar 13, 2004</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Richard Pawson</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>The framework does support multiple visual representations</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=24401</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[I just feel you'd end up creating your own custom viewers all the time.  In such a case, your framework would just get in the way.  Perhaps if a default viewer is acceptable in most scenarios then your framework makes sense but I think we might disagree...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2004 14:17:40 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2004 14:17:40 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2004 14:17:40 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Mar 12, 2004</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Pierre Menard</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>The framework does support multiple visual representations</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=24401</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[The Naked Objects framework supports the idea of multiple, alternative visual representations of an object, or collection of objects.  <br>...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2004 08:40:56 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2004 08:40:56 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2004 08:40:56 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Mar 12, 2004</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Richard Pawson</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>2</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Fundamental Problems with auto-generated GUIs</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=24401</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[To me, the most interesting aspect of this idea hasn't been talked about yet.  How is it possible to create a user interface that is generic enough to handle any 'network' of objects but be useable enough to traverse, find, and view the data?  By...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2004 16:32:31 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2004 16:32:31 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2004 16:32:31 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Mar 11, 2004</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Pierre Menard</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>5</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>A Virtual Machine Implemented with XUL- Are you serious?</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=24401</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Hi Gerald,...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2004 06:40:40 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2004 06:40:40 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2004 06:40:40 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Mar 10, 2004</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Emmanuel Sackey</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Never take this guy serious- he's a moron</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=24401</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Hi,
<br>Gerald is a guy who thinks XUL solves all presentation problems and tries to divert any forum topic on presentation to a XUL discussion. He's like he's found a hammer and every presentation problem is a nail. Therefore, I don't take him serious.]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2004 06:34:20 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2004 06:34:20 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2004 06:34:20 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Mar 10, 2004</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Emmanuel Sackey</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Naked Objects and XUL share some goals, but not all</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=24401</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[We certainly weren't implying that Naked Objects is the only way to achieve rich client interaction with thin-client maintenance.  There are several such solutions.  XUL is a laudable project....]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2004 15:50:04 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2004 15:50:04 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2004 15:50:04 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Mar 9, 2004</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Richard Pawson</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>The XUL Alternative - The Best Of Both Worlds - REST-Style</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=24401</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<div class="jive-quote">and shows you how to use Naked Objects to gain all of the advantages of a </div>...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2004 14:48:04 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2004 14:48:04 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2004 14:48:04 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Mar 9, 2004</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Gerald Bauer</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>3</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Article: Building Rich Internet Applications with Naked Objects</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=24401</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[This article discusses the need for rich clients in certain types of applications, such as expense reporting and customer-service systems. It contrasts two kinds of applications: 'transient' and 'sovereign', and shows you how to use Naked Objects to gain...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2004 11:17:27 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2004 11:17:27 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2004 11:17:27 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Mar 9, 2004</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Nitin Bharti</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>12</jf:replyCount>
    </item>



</channel>
</rss>

