<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>











<rss version="2.0" xmlns:jf="http://www.jivesoftware.com/xmlns/jiveforums/rss">



<channel>
    <title>Support Forums: Message List - Opinion: An index is not a book</title>
    <link>http://www.theserverside.com</link>
    <description>Most recent forum messages</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
        <generator>Jive Forums Silver 5.5.30 (www.jivesoftware.com)</generator>
    
    <pubDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 07:16:09 -0400</pubDate>


    <item>

        <title>SQL AOP the way to go</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=32409</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[But are they AOP for XSLT?<br><br>BTW, I was attempting humor in my previous post. :)]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2005 23:38:42 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2005 23:38:42 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2005 23:38:42 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Mar 21, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Mark N</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>SQL AOP the way to go</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=32409</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Anyone working on AOP for XSL(T)?</blockquote><br>There are a handful of aspect and/or annotation based XSLT bindings for Java.  O'Reilly owns this one:  <a href="http://www.aspectxml.org" target="_blank">http://www.aspectxml.org</a>]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2005 18:17:34 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2005 18:17:34 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2005 18:17:34 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Mar 21, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Brian Miller</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>SQL AOP the way to go</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=32409</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[I _do_ hope that this is all a joke. If it is, Dion, then it's a good one, in the dry English style. If not oh dear.]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2005 16:39:58 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2005 16:39:58 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2005 16:39:58 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Mar 21, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Radu-Adrian Popescu</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Not all data firs into tables</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=32409</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>For a queue, we wanted to get the second element, if someone had the first element locked. Again, this did not seem possible to do within plain RDBMS.</blockquote>It is. You either have to learn to work with Sybase or if it's not up to the...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2005 03:23:20 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2005 03:23:20 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2005 03:23:20 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Mar 21, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Radu-Adrian Popescu</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Opinion: An index is not a book</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=32409</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Was that supposed to be funny? Or have you actually not understood that it's a joke ?!]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2005 02:40:45 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2005 02:40:45 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2005 02:40:45 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Mar 21, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Radu-Adrian Popescu</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Database people knew it all the time!!!</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=32409</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Relational owes much/most of its prosperity to Microsoft inventing ODBC.</blockquote><br>If I remember right, ODBC was not invented by Microsoft - it came from the SQL Access Group in 1992, and was originally CLI (Call Level Interface).]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Sat, 19 Mar 2005 18:31:31 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Sat, 19 Mar 2005 18:31:31 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Sat, 19 Mar 2005 18:31:31 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Mar 19, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Steve Zara</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Database people knew it all the time!!!</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=32409</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Relational databases, though theoretically talked about prior to the 80s, really got the boost when IBM put their stamp of approval with the introduction of sql/ds and later DB2.</blockquote><br>Relational owes much/most of its prosperity to...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2005 11:30:17 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2005 11:30:17 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2005 11:30:17 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Mar 17, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Brian Miller</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>Database people knew it all the time!!!</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=32409</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Charles Armstrong points out that sometimes relational databases aren't exactly the best way to actually store data. Charles writes:  Obvious right? Well then why does everyone use relational databases for storage?</blockquote>Thousands of...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2005 03:54:20 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2005 03:54:20 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2005 03:54:20 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Mar 17, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Gopi Nathan</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>2</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>radio equipment inventory</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=32409</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Prabably I  misunderstand it and  you know better about herarchies in logical model than me. Why do you ask me ? I do not know about OODBMS and I ask about this stuff for this reason. I do not think it a shame to learn, links are helpfull, google returns...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2005 07:51:41 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2005 07:51:41 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2005 07:51:41 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Mar 16, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Juozas Baliuka</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>radio equipment inventory</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=32409</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote><blockquote><blockquote>Probably it is very special case, but there is no 1-to-1 relanship or generalization in  relational model.This is a very brief and &quot;pragmatic&quot; introction, it can help to get difference between conceptual and...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2005 06:20:54 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2005 06:20:54 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2005 06:20:54 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Mar 16, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Henrique Steckelberg</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>1</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>radio equipment inventory</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=32409</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote><blockquote>Probably it is very special case, but there is no 1-to-1 relanship or generalization in  relational model.This is a very brief and &quot;pragmatic&quot; introction, it can help to get difference between conceptual and relational...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2005 02:51:59 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2005 02:51:59 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2005 02:51:59 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Mar 16, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Juozas Baliuka</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>2</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>radio equipment inventory</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=32409</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Probably it is very special case, but there is no 1-to-1 relanship or generalization in  relational model.This is a very brief and &quot;pragmatic&quot; introction, it can help to get difference between conceptual and relational model.<a...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 15 Mar 2005 12:57:25 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 15 Mar 2005 12:57:25 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 15 Mar 2005 12:57:25 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Mar 15, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Henrique Steckelberg</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>3</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>marketing BS or magic</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=32409</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>RDBMSes are superb for general purpose use, but in some cases, OODBMSes can retrieve data far faster.  This can be seen by the situations where object databases are used: often in situations where very high volume of data retrieval is...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 15 Mar 2005 12:24:09 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 15 Mar 2005 12:24:09 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 15 Mar 2005 12:24:09 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Mar 15, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Brian Miller</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>radio equipment inventory</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=32409</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>I enjoyed the give and take spirit of the discussions</blockquote><br>Me too.  <br><br>I want to apologise again - I try and sound detached and objective in my posts, but I realise that can seem aloof and arrogant in some cases - I will try...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 15 Mar 2005 10:35:12 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 15 Mar 2005 10:35:12 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 15 Mar 2005 10:35:12 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Mar 15, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Steve Zara</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>0</jf:replyCount>
    </item>


    <item>

        <title>radio equipment inventory</title>
        <link>http://www.theserverside.com/discussions/thread.tss?thread_id=32409</link>

        

        
            <description><![CDATA[Probably it is very special case, but there is no 1-to-1 relanship or generalization in  relational model.<br>This is a very brief and &quot;pragmatic&quot; introction, it can help to get difference between conceptual and relational model.<br><a...]]></description>
        

        <pubDate>Tue, 15 Mar 2005 09:55:16 -0500</pubDate>

        

        <jf:creationDate>Tue, 15 Mar 2005 09:55:16 -0500</jf:creationDate>
        <jf:modificationDate>Tue, 15 Mar 2005 09:55:16 -0500</jf:modificationDate>
        <jf:date>Mar 15, 2005</jf:date>
        <jf:author>Juozas Baliuka</jf:author>
        <jf:replyCount>4</jf:replyCount>
    </item>



</channel>
</rss>

